IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Servers?
IBM still makes thier own servers, AFAIK. I'm guessing, though, that mix of Linux/AIX/Windows is such that the risk of increased licensing cost is acceptable to them in that market.
--
Steve
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu]
New So, they typically sell them without an OS nowaday.
Mainly because the "big accounts" already have a VLK/MLP/OLP with Microsoft.

Weee. Watch the fallout as it continues.

Oh yeah, one other thing.

It explains why I believe Microsoft has been behind the SCOG machinations from the start.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
Expand Edited by folkert March 8, 2006, 03:49:52 PM EST
     IBM ditching windows - (SpiceWare) - (28)
         :-) - (Steve Lowe)
         Re: IBM ditching windows - (pwhysall)
         More - (Steve Lowe) - (23)
             One piece of speculation there sounds on the money - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                 Servers? - (Steve Lowe) - (1)
                     So, they typically sell them without an OS nowaday. - (folkert)
                 Good point. - (Another Scott)
             His Reflections on Apple seem wrong - (SpiceWare) - (18)
                 I think they're accurate - (ben_tilly) - (17)
                     interesting - thanx -NT - (SpiceWare)
                     Not entirely - (tuberculosis) - (15)
                         They comply with the license. Big whoop. - (ben_tilly) - (14)
                             That's a very old post - (tuberculosis) - (13)
                                 It is under a year old - (ben_tilly) - (12)
                                     Things move fast - (tuberculosis) - (11)
                                         Please clarify - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                                             The post that you cite - (tuberculosis) - (9)
                                                 Sounds like desperate rationalisation on your part. - (CRConrad) - (8)
                                                     No, Apple is plenty flakey in lots of areas - (tuberculosis) - (5)
                                                         So, what is WebKit's User-Agent string again...? - (CRConrad) - (4)
                                                             It doesn't have one - (tuberculosis)
                                                             Re: So, what is WebKit's User-Agent string again...? - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                                                 That would mean I was at least partly wrong - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                                                     maybe you should suggest an Apple Is Guilty forum -NT - (SpiceWare)
                                                     And your familarity with the events is what, CRC? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                         Zero[*]. Did I ever say anything else? - (CRConrad)
         Or Not. - (altmann) - (1)
             30,000 desktop "pilot program" according to . . . - (Andrew Grygus)

Aim for the flattop!
63 ms