Is this a personal or business account?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 3 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #245,415

2/19/06 4:46:11 PM

Is this a personal or business account?

And is the address a static or DHCP one?

Post #245,416

2/19/06 4:49:04 PM

Personal -

Though one of the forwarders is professional. Speakeasy doesn't care, as long as you're not spamming or doing anything illegal. The address is static...

Imric's Tips for Living

Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.

Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.

Post #245,418

2/19/06 5:02:39 PM

You need to pay speakeasy more money to make it work.

I've got a business account with them.
One if the features of a business account is DNS setup.

Without the DNS setup, you CANNOT get a reverse DNS to work since no matter what you say at register.com, if the ISP does not delegate the addresses it is not the authoratative name server, which means no one knows to go to it for the address.

Bottom line: You work by accident. No matter how well, it is still an accident.

But: You may be able to kludge it. Some more.

Change your system name to match the reverse DNS entry. Give it a shot.

Post #245,421

2/19/06 5:43:12 PM

No surprises.

I understand that a reverse isn't going to work. I don't think it COULD work for my setup. That's why I don't understand how it can be a common check for mailservers though. It isn't logical (to me anyway) that I can have no trouble with virtually all mailservers when reverse DNS won't work for me, if even a sizable percentage were using it.

Interesting idea about the system name though. Gonna try it.

Imric's Tips for Living

Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.

Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.

Mail servers? - (tuberculosis) - (66) - Feb. 18, 2006, 02:12:39 AM EST

no imap, bad monkey - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 18, 2006, 02:30:52 AM EST

I think I wasn't clear on my use case. - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Feb. 18, 2006, 04:49:37 AM EST

mailx is your friend, why teach an app mail when you can - (boxley) - Feb. 18, 2006, 09:12:29 AM EST

Look into courier for imap & squirrelmail for webmail -NT - (pwhysall) - (2) - Feb. 18, 2006, 02:44:40 AM EST

Aye - I use both - they work really well. - (imric) - Feb. 18, 2006, 03:00:40 AM EST

Seconded with a proviso. - (static) - Feb. 20, 2006, 06:39:26 AM EST

Here's what I do - (broomberg) - (59) - Feb. 18, 2006, 11:22:33 AM EST

I question the reverse DNS thing. - (imric) - (58) - Feb. 18, 2006, 11:45:15 AM EST

Almost ALL DSL ISPs refused mine - (broomberg) - (14) - Feb. 18, 2006, 06:14:14 PM EST

I send to both Comcast and AOL - (imric) - (13) - Feb. 18, 2006, 10:46:04 PM EST

Can't answer that - (broomberg) - (12) - Feb. 18, 2006, 10:56:39 PM EST

Karsten always bitched that he couldn't mail his mum... - (pwhysall) - (11) - Feb. 19, 2006, 03:20:13 AM EST

K - but that isn't a DNS issue... - (imric) - (10) - Feb. 19, 2006, 08:44:07 AM EST

Yeah, it was. - (pwhysall) - (9) - Feb. 19, 2006, 09:39:32 AM EST

And that has WHAT to do with the names? - (imric) - (8) - Feb. 19, 2006, 12:16:00 PM EST

It's BOTH - (broomberg) - (7) - Feb. 19, 2006, 12:45:04 PM EST

I don't have just a client. Except if you claim EVERY - (imric) - (6) - Feb. 19, 2006, 03:19:37 PM EST

OK. maybe I've both misunderstood and overreacted - (broomberg) - (5) - Feb. 19, 2006, 04:00:36 PM EST

Well - that's the way I understood warhead to work - (imric) - (4) - Feb. 19, 2006, 04:32:21 PM EST

Is this a personal or business account? - (broomberg) - (3) - Feb. 19, 2006, 04:46:11 PM EST

Personal - - (imric) - (2) - Feb. 19, 2006, 04:49:04 PM EST

You need to pay speakeasy more money to make it work. - (broomberg) - (1) - Feb. 19, 2006, 05:02:39 PM EST

No surprises. - (imric) - Feb. 19, 2006, 05:43:12 PM EST

break down, haul yer ass uphill for dinner and beer - (boxley) - (42) - Feb. 19, 2006, 09:04:21 PM EST

How can you help - (broomberg) - (41) - Feb. 19, 2006, 09:22:30 PM EST

gotta get him drunk first - (boxley) - (40) - Feb. 19, 2006, 09:33:57 PM EST

Since your shop SHOULD refuse his email... - (broomberg) - (39) - Feb. 19, 2006, 09:36:08 PM EST

naw, I whitelisted him :-) - (boxley) - Feb. 19, 2006, 10:36:48 PM EST

OT we need to back channel about yer bidness moydel - (boxley) - (6) - Feb. 19, 2006, 10:39:53 PM EST

Send contact info to biz account - (broomberg) - (5) - Feb. 19, 2006, 11:00:16 PM EST

two stupid for that - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 19, 2006, 11:35:18 PM EST

This your work #? -NT - (broomberg) - Feb. 19, 2006, 11:42:34 PM EST

Does not work - (broomberg) - (2) - Feb. 20, 2006, 08:20:56 AM EST

well if I could type and was not dyslexic - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2006, 09:26:19 AM EST

Can't go there right now - (broomberg) - Feb. 20, 2006, 10:36:29 AM EST

A bug in all systems? - (imric) - (30) - Feb. 19, 2006, 10:45:12 PM EST

He whitelisted you - (broomberg) - (29) - Feb. 19, 2006, 11:31:25 PM EST

Very possible. Very plausible. -NT - (imric) - Feb. 19, 2006, 11:41:47 PM EST

That is ... - (drewk) - (7) - Feb. 20, 2006, 01:23:06 AM EST

For *very* low values of "multi-week". - (CRConrad) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2006, 04:46:15 AM EST

You finished? - (drewk) - (2) - Feb. 20, 2006, 04:37:50 AM EST

Fsck, there was THAT much of it? - (CRConrad) - Feb. 20, 2006, 04:45:15 AM EST

And that was IN flames. - (imric) - Feb. 20, 2006, 07:17:09 AM EST

Um. No. - (imric) - (2) - Feb. 20, 2006, 07:13:56 AM EST

Oh come on, I was just poking CRC - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2006, 11:05:45 AM EST

And quite deservedly so. <shakes head/> -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 21, 2006, 02:11:14 AM EST

no sharing of whitelists, only black -NT - (boxley) - (19) - Feb. 20, 2006, 11:16:01 AM EST

*grumble* - (imric) - (18) - Feb. 20, 2006, 11:19:09 AM EST

See what I mean? - (drewk) - (17) - Feb. 20, 2006, 11:23:22 AM EST

*sigh* I suppose so. - (imric) - (16) - Feb. 20, 2006, 11:44:26 AM EST

My variation on that - (drewk) - (14) - Feb. 20, 2006, 11:54:14 AM EST

Our network admin was just bit by that - (imric) - (13) - Feb. 20, 2006, 11:59:04 AM EST

what exactly is the error you get? -NT - (boxley) - (12) - Feb. 20, 2006, 01:11:15 PM EST

I'll let you know after I see him - - (imric) - (11) - Feb. 20, 2006, 01:20:24 PM EST

oops replied to wrong post - (boxley) - (10) - Feb. 20, 2006, 01:27:49 PM EST

Here: - (imric) - (9) - Feb. 20, 2006, 01:45:39 PM EST

Have you tried e-mailing Alaric? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2006, 01:59:11 PM EST

Nah - I have a workaround. - (imric) - Feb. 21, 2006, 07:13:15 AM EST

send an email to function01 at cigarboat.cox.net thx -NT - (boxley) - (6) - Feb. 20, 2006, 02:12:00 PM EST

DIrectly? 1 min - have to reset sendmail to send directly. -NT - (imric) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2006, 02:54:04 PM EST

let me know when, hasnt hit my mta yet -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2006, 03:25:50 PM EST

Sent... - (imric) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2006, 04:12:44 PM EST

clearly the issue - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 20, 2006, 04:08:03 PM EST

Now that's something I needed to know. - (imric) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2006, 04:26:43 PM EST

list handling itself is a whole nother topic - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2006, 06:26:49 PM EST

Put the needle on the record....skrrrpppt! - (folkert) - Feb. 20, 2006, 11:55:59 AM EST

Billion people harvest on Mars.
171 ms