IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New It mentions, in passing, cases like that. :-)
There are ways around that too:

Some states take details out of public laws and place them in unofficial and informal documents, such as committee or subcommittee reports. The purpose of these documents is to give guidance to agencies on how a lump sum should be spent. Although the documents are advisory and legally non-binding, agencies normally comply. In Michigan, after the governor threatened to veto a provision granting a waiver for college tuition to Native Americans, the legislature rolled the funds into another account and reached an understanding with the agency head, by letter, that it use the funds to waive the tuition. There was no legislative language for the governor to veto.


I'm sure there are similar things that can happen in WV.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Sure. It does make it harder to do, though
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Not really
Seems like the budgetory version of security through obscurity.
Those that know about the loopholes can abuse them, those that don't are abused.
     State of Union speech comes across lukewarm - (JayMehaffey) - (21)
         I particularly like the request for a Line-Item Veto.... - (Simon_Jester) - (17)
             Yeah because it's so disrupting to veto the whole bill. - (Silverlock) - (16)
                 Better idea - (bepatient) - (15)
                     I like -NT - (ben_tilly)
                     California ballot measures are like that. - (Andrew Grygus)
                     "If I Were President" - (admin)
                     Point missed.... - (Simon_Jester) - (2)
                         No. I know it was rejected. - (bepatient) - (1)
                             Agreement....your point is very well thought out. - (Simon_Jester)
                     Unfortunately, there are ways around it. - (Another Scott) - (8)
                         A balanced budget is bad fiscal policy - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                             As an absolute, yes. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                 "Balanced over every 7 year period" could work. - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                     I like it. -NT - (Another Scott)
                         Not an item veto - (bepatient) - (3)
                             It mentions, in passing, cases like that. :-) - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                 Sure. It does make it harder to do, though -NT - (bepatient) - (1)
                                     Not really - (broomberg)
         I liked the "we're winning" line. -NT - (pwhysall)
         I can't bear to hear/look at him - wake me for next election -NT - (tuberculosis) - (1)
             I have to look at him. - (a6l6e6x)

My God, it's full of stars...
39 ms