Where is Judicial Conservatism?
It should make no difference (from the Judicial Conservative point of view) to the Supreme Court that the science involved lacks the credibility of a Trot reading. The question is whether the law is applicable to the case at hand and constitutional.
Dammit, we need some Justices who beleive the line they gave at the confirmation hearings.
Judicial restraint is, as Conservatives used to be so fond of pointing out, is A Good Thing. Not the only Good Thing, but an absolutely essential Good Thing. A court without restraint is, in effect, a govornment without checks and balances, and as such, invites revolution.
