IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Patent Wars and Antitrust Forum / Is there more in it that what was in the transcript?
Post #241,329
by altmann
1/14/06 3:33:27 AM
Reply
New Is there more in it that what was in the transcript?
Because I read that and it sounds like he doesn't know what he really "found" yet.

FWIW MS doesn't seem to think there's much to it:

[link|http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2006/01/13/417431.aspx|http://blogs.technet...01/13/417431.aspx]

but that's what they want you to think.
--
Chris Altmann
Post #241,440
by jb4
Picture of jb4
1/15/06 12:56:46 PM
Reply
New Where'd you find a transcript?
Since I don't have an iPod, a podcast is only slightly less useless than a toothache.
jb4
shrub●bish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
Post #241,441
by Another Scott
1/15/06 1:00:50 PM
Reply
New On GRC
[link|http://www.grc.com/SecurityNow.htm#22|Here]'s a variety of formats.

Not a lot of meat there, though.

Cheers,
Scott.
Post #241,473
by drewk
Picture of drewk
1/15/06 8:56:10 PM
Reply
New Podcast is just an MP3
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
     Steve Gibson: "WMF flaw was a deliberate back door". - (Andrew Grygus) - (30) - Jan. 13, 2006, 07:13:31 PM EST
         He needs to adjust his tinfoil IMHO -NT - (altmann) - (9) - Jan. 13, 2006, 08:24:32 PM EST
             He's got a pretty good case - (bepatient) - (8) - Jan. 13, 2006, 09:28:28 PM EST
                 Yup - (broomberg) - Jan. 13, 2006, 09:46:45 PM EST
                 Is there more in it that what was in the transcript? - (altmann) - (3) - Jan. 14, 2006, 03:33:27 AM EST
                     Where'd you find a transcript? - (jb4) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2006, 12:56:46 PM EST
                         On GRC - (Another Scott) - Jan. 15, 2006, 01:00:50 PM EST
                         Podcast is just an MP3 -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 15, 2006, 08:56:10 PM EST
                 A guy over at SysInternals is said to be . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Jan. 14, 2006, 08:05:11 PM EST
                     Sysinternals verdict: Not a back door - (altmann) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2006, 04:21:27 AM EST
                         Just stupidity and incompetence, eh? SOP for M$. -NT - (n3jja) - Jan. 21, 2006, 08:31:13 AM EST
         Seems very unlikely to me - (JayMehaffey) - (13) - Jan. 16, 2006, 03:18:21 PM EST
             But thats just as bad - (bepatient) - (5) - Jan. 16, 2006, 04:07:08 PM EST
                 Do I unnderstand this right? - (drewk) - (3) - Jan. 16, 2006, 05:03:27 PM EST
                     did $MS understand multithreading when they wrote it? -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 16, 2006, 05:17:35 PM EST
                     It is part of that - (JayMehaffey) - Jan. 16, 2006, 06:38:38 PM EST
                     No. - (broomberg) - Jan. 16, 2006, 09:08:08 PM EST
                 I would say not quite as bad - (JayMehaffey) - Jan. 16, 2006, 06:43:55 PM EST
             Microsoft have an explanation. - (static) - (6) - Jan. 18, 2006, 01:02:33 AM EST
                 Artful Dodging - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 16, 2006, 11:01:16 PM EST
                     Link fixed. - (static) - Jan. 18, 2006, 01:08:26 AM EST
                 I like how that "blog" doesn't allow comments, too. -NT - (admin) - Jan. 16, 2006, 11:02:31 PM EST
                 If it's brought forward from legacy stuff . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Jan. 17, 2006, 02:41:55 AM EST
                     Dang. Beat me to it. That was my first thought. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2006, 11:03:40 AM EST
                         No default program for WMF = No "critical" vulnerability -NT - (altmann) - Jan. 17, 2006, 08:29:52 PM EST
         Interesting "analysis" / Guess-of-motives - (Ashton) - (5) - Jan. 21, 2006, 06:42:09 AM EST
             Shields up is a waste of time. - (pwhysall) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2006, 11:24:14 AM EST
                 Elitist smugness - (Ashton) - (3) - Jan. 29, 2006, 06:10:34 AM EST
                     Whatever, Ash. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 29, 2006, 07:52:18 AM EST
                         Sorry Ash, but Peter is right here. -NT - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 29, 2006, 10:43:04 AM EST
                         I acknowledge those valld criticisms. - (Ashton) - Jan. 30, 2006, 05:35:00 AM EST

If the answer to your question starts with, "Well ... ", you're not going to like what comes next.
100 ms