IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Sure they were.
I'd love to know if they were 'informed' of [link|http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/12-05/12-17-05/a09lo650.htm|this crap]. But then, that'd be a (Police) State Secret, needed to protect our poor civilians against knowledge - er, terrorism.

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
New Sure they are all busy compiling enemies lists at this point
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Of course. (33 kB Tom Toles .img)
[image|http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinion/ssi/images/Toles/c_12182005_520.gif|0|I always feel like, somebody's watching me...|439|520]

:-/

Cheers,
Scott.
New I thought it was a spoof
I had opened it up in another frame, and forgot about it being linked to you post.

Holy shit.
New (I hear the NY Times is being bought by The Onion)
Efficiency.. saves duplication of content.

New :-)
     Bush authorized domestic spying - (imric) - (24)
         Did you forget the sarcasm sign? Or are you really shocked? -NT - (jbrabeck) - (20)
             The idea that our law'n'order - (imric) - (19)
                 Equally amazing - (bepatient)
                 Well...to give Bush credit... - (Simon_Jester) - (17)
                     'I'm not sure what happens next. ' - Our Motto\ufffd, Y2K+ -NT - (Ashton)
                     Re: I'm not sure what happens next. - (a6l6e6x) - (15)
                         what I find amusing is that congess leaders were informed - (boxley) - (6)
                             Sure they were. - (imric) - (5)
                                 Sure they are all busy compiling enemies lists at this point -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                     Of course. (33 kB Tom Toles .img) - (Another Scott)
                                 I thought it was a spoof - (broomberg) - (2)
                                     (I hear the NY Times is being bought by The Onion) - (Ashton) - (1)
                                         :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                         Oddly enough (to my ears, anyway) - 'impeachment' - (Ashton) - (5)
                             You fuel! - (jb4) - (4)
                                 Errr . . . I think you really don't need the sign this time. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                                     (Who says I was being sarcastic?) -NT - (jb4) - (1)
                                         It's no use - Homeland Security already has your name. -NT - (Andrew Grygus)
                                 (Ahem) THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES! - (imqwerky)
                         Impeachment? - (lincoln) - (1)
                             Given the makeup of the house.... - (Simon_Jester)
         Cointelpro back in action. - (Silverlock)
         To paraphrase Jay Leno,... - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
             :-) -NT - (Another Scott)

Note for the linguistically-impaired: That was a rhetorical question. (Second note, for the vocabulary-challenged: That means you're not supposed to answer it.)
160 ms