If they can't even spell the name of the city correctly, how could you take anything else in the article as fact?
Worldnetdaily says "Australia's Muslims have inflicted on their hosts harm that exceeds by far the scratches and other scurrilities they suffered from the surfers". Putting aside the fact that, by using the word 'hosts' it brands all of Australia's Muslim population as only being 'guests' rather than Australians.
As for the rough version of events - Lebanese youths attacked some surf life savers. Next weekend 5000 pissed (that's drunk, as well as angry) idiots chased after and attacked a women simply because she was wearing a headscarf. Some of these charming individuals were wearing t-shirts proclaiming "ethnic cleansing unit" and the like. The initial attacks were of course a terrible thing, but the overreaction is just disgusting. There's no 'goodies' vs 'baddies' in this one. For example it's the Anglos that were [link|http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200512/s1532636.htm|arrested for stockpiling molotov cocktails]...
This article is no better than our loathsome shock jocks who have to all intents and purposes incited violence against Australian Muslims, yet somehow have avoided being arrested for it. I guess you can get away with anything when 300,000 people vote the way you tell them to. Sigh.
Anyway, as many people have said to you before, Box - will you stop reading that shit?! From all the news sources I have read, "... shot at parents and kids who convened to sing carols at a primary school in western Sydney." is a complete and utter fabrication.