We make them independent of code, and do them first

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #236,368 by ben_tilly 11/28/05 11:13:52 PM Reply	We make them independent of code, and do them first We are not, however, using significant PL/SQL. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #236,372 by admin 11/28/05 11:33:57 PM Reply	Automated or no? Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #236,384 by ben_tilly 11/29/05 1:15:59 AM Reply	No Changes are fairly minor and not that frequent. We'll probably tighten this up after it becomes an issue, but it hasn't ever been one. If we did more in the database, or more databases to synchronize, then we'd automate in a heartbeat. The farthest that we've gone towards automation is to have a file listing things that need to be done before a push. The push halts, displays the file, and asks if this has been done yet. Remember the scale here. We have less than 10 developers, and logic tends to be implemented at the Perl level. (Major exception, reports tend to be built in pure SQL.) Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)

How do you manage database changes? - (admin) - (21) - Nov. 28, 2005, 09:26:01 PM EST

Re: How do you manage database changes? - (JimWeirich) - (11) - Nov. 28, 2005, 11:05:29 PM EST

Mind responding to some rails criticism? - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Nov. 28, 2005, 11:21:33 PM EST

I would be interested to see... - (admin) - (8) - Nov. 28, 2005, 11:33:39 PM EST

A Nested Comments Example - (JimWeirich) - (7) - Nov. 29, 2005, 12:03:04 PM EST

Either one of us is missing something, or Rails is magic - (drewk) - (6) - Nov. 29, 2005, 12:23:04 PM EST

I Missed Something - (JimWeirich) - (5) - Nov. 29, 2005, 02:08:41 PM EST

Adjacency trees are simple. - (admin) - (4) - Nov. 29, 2005, 02:15:57 PM EST

Re: Adjacency trees are simple. - (JimWeirich) - (3) - Nov. 29, 2005, 03:36:42 PM EST

The arbitrary SQL somewhat answers my question... - (admin) - Nov. 29, 2005, 03:44:52 PM EST

Not what he meant - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2005, 03:50:50 PM EST

Re: Not what he meant - (JimWeirich) - Nov. 29, 2005, 04:59:48 PM EST

Re: Mind responding to some rails criticism? - (JimWeirich) - Nov. 29, 2005, 11:41:17 AM EST

Weekly change scripts - (Yendor) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2005, 11:13:49 PM EST

We do something like that. - (static) - (2) - Nov. 29, 2005, 06:51:00 PM EST

Oh, *that* process will scale well :-/ -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2005, 10:19:26 PM EST

Tell me about it. - (static) - Nov. 30, 2005, 08:33:05 PM EST

We make them independent of code, and do them first - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2005, 11:13:52 PM EST

Automated or no? -NT - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2005, 11:33:57 PM EST

No - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 29, 2005, 01:15:59 AM EST

Two answers - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:47:35 PM EDT

Re: How do you manage database changes? - (dws) - Dec. 3, 2005, 07:54:12 PM EST

This isn't beer, this is lemonade.
53 ms