IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / Thanks. I meant USSC cases. ;0)
Post #236,316
by mmoffitt
11/28/05 1:55:45 PM
Reply
New Thanks. I meant USSC cases. ;0)
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
     Bill O'Reilly supports terrorists - (andread) - (185) - Nov. 11, 2005, 02:16:27 PM EST
         Only SF? - (bepatient) - (184) - Nov. 11, 2005, 03:55:47 PM EST
             All or nothing? - (hnick) - (182) - Nov. 11, 2005, 05:26:35 PM EST
                 Don't be a goof - (bepatient) - (181) - Nov. 11, 2005, 05:32:48 PM EST
                     How not? - (hnick) - (180) - Nov. 11, 2005, 06:52:57 PM EST
                         Re: How not? - (bepatient) - (179) - Nov. 11, 2005, 07:06:46 PM EST
                             What's the death rate of BET employees? - (broomberg) - (93) - Nov. 11, 2005, 07:08:32 PM EST
                                 Black helicopters on way from Ft. Dix to Barry's house. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Nov. 11, 2005, 08:29:26 PM EST
                                 So no police, fire and first responders either? -NT - (bepatient) - (20) - Nov. 11, 2005, 09:57:31 PM EST
                                     Unlikely - (broomberg) - (19) - Nov. 12, 2005, 08:48:32 AM EST
                                         Oh dear - (bepatient) - (18) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:50:42 AM EST
                                             There you go again - (broomberg) - (17) - Nov. 12, 2005, 05:04:05 PM EST
                                                 I have in several posts - (bepatient) - (16) - Nov. 12, 2005, 07:55:30 PM EST
                                                     Fine - (broomberg) - (12) - Nov. 12, 2005, 07:59:02 PM EST
                                                         Until then - (bepatient) - (11) - Nov. 12, 2005, 08:01:11 PM EST
                                                             In HS, they aren't 'people'; they are CHILDREN. -NT - (Ashton) - (10) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:53:30 AM EST
                                                                 Actually, no - (broomberg) - (9) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:09:08 AM EST
                                                                     Nice ad-hom - (bepatient) - (8) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:32:27 AM EST
                                                                         While they can't sign until adults - (broomberg) - (7) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:50:36 AM EST
                                                                             What I've said - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:56:48 AM EST
                                                                                 McDonald's doesn't train kids to kill or be killed - (imqwerky) - (5) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:32:59 PM EST
                                                                                     just blow the wrong gender and instant discharge - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:10:08 PM EST
                                                                                         pun intended? -NT - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:45:18 PM EST
                                                                                             nope, just unintended brilliance! :-) -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:46:07 PM EST
                                                                                     Thank you for proving my point - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 08:18:23 AM EST
                                                                                     Sorta depends on who you ask... - (jb4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:36:21 PM EST
                                                     Re: I have in several posts - (jb4) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:32:37 PM EST
                                                         Look. - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:00:21 PM EST
                                                         Technically not illegal - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:29:18 PM EST
                                 Put it another way... - (pwhysall) - (67) - Nov. 12, 2005, 12:35:05 AM EST
                                     Then no police and no correctional officers - (bepatient) - (66) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:51:52 AM EST
                                         Sounds fair enough to me. -NT - (pwhysall) - (65) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:02:42 AM EST
                                             So then you feel comfortable - (bepatient) - (64) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:30:45 AM EST
                                                 Yes, basically. - (pwhysall) - (49) - Nov. 12, 2005, 01:21:09 PM EST
                                                     Difference of opinion, then. - (bepatient) - (48) - Nov. 12, 2005, 02:23:19 PM EST
                                                         No-one's options are being limited by my point of view. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2005, 03:18:00 PM EST
                                                             The brush is a bit broad - (hnick) - Nov. 12, 2005, 04:44:30 PM EST
                                                         Ya know, Bill... - (jb4) - (45) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:46:15 PM EST
                                                             Re: Ya know, Bill... - (bepatient) - (44) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:04:53 PM EST
                                                                 There is another POV on this. - (mmoffitt) - (42) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:09:42 PM EST
                                                                     You're qualifying again - (bepatient) - (38) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:36:55 PM EST
                                                                         Private != State != Federal. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (20) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:40:45 PM EST
                                                                             And you continue - (bepatient) - (19) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:45:21 PM EST
                                                                                 It's about States autonomy from this pov. - (mmoffitt) - (18) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:50:03 PM EST
                                                                                     No it isn't. - (bepatient) - (17) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:29:13 PM EST
                                                                                         Again, this time with feeling. - (mmoffitt) - (15) - Nov. 14, 2005, 04:06:01 PM EST
                                                                                             You are mixing things up - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 04:16:15 PM EST
                                                                                             If the Federal Government really wants to, they can - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2005, 05:10:15 PM EST
                                                                                                 They can raise armies as needed, but pussy communists - (boxley) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2005, 06:30:59 PM EST
                                                                                                     why don't you tell us what you really feel box. - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:26:52 PM EST
                                                                                                         pussy communists, where the army cant be used in the US - (boxley) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 08:39:22 PM EST
                                                                                                             :-) -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 08:48:19 PM EST
                                                                                                             What are you on about? - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:16:48 AM EST
                                                                                                                 rent a movie called tank -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:29:29 AM EST
                                                                                                                     That '84 Maverick flick? ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:33:16 AM EST
                                                                                                 "by any means necessary" is implied, then? - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Nov. 23, 2005, 11:24:18 AM EST
                                                                                                     Not quite ANY means.. - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Nov. 23, 2005, 10:25:51 PM EST
                                                                                                         Has that ever been challenged? Did any State try to opt out? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2005, 12:09:40 PM EST
                                                                                                             not since 1865 -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2005, 01:08:26 PM EST
                                                                                                                 Thanks. I meant USSC cases. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 28, 2005, 01:55:45 PM EST
                                                                                                             Yes, and I do not know - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 28, 2005, 05:09:24 PM EST
                                                                                         Red Herring alert number 2581 (or so) - (jb4) - Nov. 16, 2005, 01:54:01 PM EST
                                                                         But, must everybody be allowed to recruit if the Fed is? -NT - (imric) - (16) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:45:28 PM EST
                                                                             Any specific exclusion should be frowned upon - (bepatient) - (15) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:47:23 PM EST
                                                                                 How about groups that promote violence and killing? - (imric) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:17:46 PM EST
                                                                                     or democrats depending on your point of view -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:27:27 PM EST
                                                                                     Was wondering where that was headed - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 15, 2005, 12:23:00 AM EST
                                                                                         Political parties are not businesses either. - (imric) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:23:15 AM EST
                                                                                             Are they paying now? - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:56:38 AM EST
                                                                                                 Yes you did. $300.00 -NT - (imric) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2005, 12:00:26 PM EST
                                                                                                     That was my money - (bepatient) - Nov. 15, 2005, 12:23:42 PM EST
                                                                                 How about Al Qaida? CPUSA? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:19:38 AM EST
                                                                                     What, trying to find somebody I don't like? - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:58:18 AM EST
                                                                                         Nope. Just testing your metal. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 15, 2005, 11:46:37 AM EST
                                                                                         Then here's one for you. - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:11:46 PM EST
                                                                                             You're right - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:13:39 PM EST
                                                                                                 NCLB Sec 9525 covers the Boy Scouts. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:22:43 PM EST
                                                                                                     Section HOW MANY?!? - (jb4) - (1) - Nov. 16, 2005, 01:40:15 PM EST
                                                                                                         It's not that bad. - (Another Scott) - Nov. 16, 2005, 01:57:51 PM EST
                                                                     they take the federal dole, thats why -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:24:32 PM EST
                                                                         Even that doesn't feature in my reasoning. - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:31:19 PM EST
                                                                         Not much, they aren't. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2005, 04:07:38 PM EST
                                                                 Yes I am... - (jb4) - Nov. 16, 2005, 01:43:33 PM EST
                                                 Um, that wouldn't be freedom. That'd be indoctrination. - (mmoffitt) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:20:25 AM EST
                                                     Next - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:24:09 AM EST
                                                         Um, that wouldn't be me. That'd be DHS. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:32:38 AM EST
                                                     like what you teach your kids :-) /me dux -NT - (boxley) - (10) - Nov. 14, 2005, 12:34:57 PM EST
                                                         I don't teach my kids anything anymore. They teach me. - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:12:40 PM EST
                                                             tell me about it - (boxley) - (8) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:32:27 PM EST
                                                                 If that's true, - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:37:34 PM EST
                                                                     will be 17 in Jan, link below - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:46:38 PM EST
                                                                         Thanks. I'll give 'em a gander ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:10:36 PM EST
                                                                 is it pre-marital if they're not going to get married? -NT - (SpiceWare) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:31:48 PM EST
                                                                     Im afraid to ask :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:25:48 PM EST
                                                                         Well, clarify that before I go show mine the pic. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2005, 04:06:56 PM EST
                                                                 He didn't give you the whole story - (broomberg) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:52:43 PM EST
                                                                 Just because he doesn't believe in it . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:57:20 PM EST
                                 In the South? -NT - (imric) - Nov. 12, 2005, 09:40:28 AM EST
                                 That's not gonna fly - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:45:47 AM EDT
                                     Indeed: SHOCK n'AWE competing with GM corner office - - (Ashton) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:00:51 AM EST
                             Discrimination.. we have to give that up, too? - (Ashton) - (84) - Nov. 12, 2005, 02:59:41 AM EST
                                 Ah, I see. - (bepatient) - (83) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:54:10 AM EST
                                     Yeah, he *is* "SMARTER than THEM". They're KIDS. - (CRConrad) - (74) - Nov. 12, 2005, 06:01:17 PM EST
                                         At 18, I might be smarter... - (bepatient) - (73) - Nov. 12, 2005, 07:59:16 PM EST
                                             So you agree - (imqwerky) - (72) - Nov. 12, 2005, 09:42:12 PM EST
                                                 Not so fast dearest - (bepatient) - (71) - Nov. 12, 2005, 09:52:01 PM EST
                                                     Re: Not so fast dearest - (andread) - (65) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:02:39 PM EST
                                                         Tis a law I believe - (bepatient) - (64) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:04:19 PM EST
                                                             Discrimination is not created equal - (ben_tilly) - (63) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:32:26 PM EST
                                                                 Then you have a poor understanding of what I think - (bepatient) - (60) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:40:49 PM EST
                                                                     Re-read what you wrote - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:21:06 PM EST
                                                                         I am of the opinion - (bepatient) - (12) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:50:47 PM EST
                                                                             My understanding is... - (ben_tilly) - (11) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:34:41 AM EST
                                                                                 Different situation altogether - (bepatient) - (10) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:43:40 AM EST
                                                                                     There's something basic at stake here - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:00:25 AM EST
                                                                                         And I'm telling you that I think its different - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:35:12 AM EST
                                                                                             In short, I'm wasting my breath - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 03:24:50 PM EST
                                                                                                 Box gave you one - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:42:27 PM EST
                                                                                                     Yes, boxley did. But even if he didn't, you wouldn't have. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:44:58 PM EST
                                                                                                         For the stated reasons - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 08:22:49 AM EST
                                                                                         lets try some case law shall we? - (boxley) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:48:18 AM EST
                                                                                             Can you say where that case is from? - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 03:47:26 PM EST
                                                                                                 hmm, thought I linked it, here ya go - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:23:24 PM EST
                                                                                                     That does look applicable, thanks -NT - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:42:46 PM EST
                                                                     Sophistry flying under perverse banner, Social Darwinism 101 - (Ashton) - (45) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:52:04 AM EST
                                                                         Sophistry ? - (bepatient) - (44) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:43:10 AM EST
                                                                             They can quit McDonalds - (broomberg) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:52:04 AM EST
                                                                                 Because it makes no difference - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:58:47 AM EST
                                                                                     no difference - (andread) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 04:55:51 PM EST
                                                                                         More of a limit - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:44:58 PM EST
                                                                                             I think some people - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 13, 2005, 08:14:53 PM EST
                                                                             Companies are not the same as the armed forces - (pwhysall) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:26:49 AM EST
                                                                             Other employers - (imric) - (37) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:57:00 AM EST
                                                                                 See above. -NT - (bepatient) - (36) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:59:22 AM EST
                                                                                     No. - (imric) - (35) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:04:37 PM EST
                                                                                         You continue to hunt for things - (bepatient) - (34) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:20:51 PM EST
                                                                                             No-one's taking any choices away, though. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:44:21 PM EST
                                                                                                 Without equal access - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:50:37 PM EST
                                                                                                     Yes, adults do know better than children. -NT - (pwhysall) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:32:34 AM EST
                                                                                             Ok, how about this? - (hnick) - (30) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:01:52 PM EST
                                                                                                 But but but - (broomberg) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:32:44 PM EST
                                                                                                     Their problem. TS as it were... -NT - (hnick) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:38:35 PM EST
                                                                                                         I guess I needed the sign -NT - (broomberg) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 02:07:05 PM EST
                                                                                                             Me too -NT - (hnick) - Nov. 13, 2005, 02:41:25 PM EST
                                                                                                 I'm cool with that. - (bepatient) - (25) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:49:32 PM EST
                                                                                                     It was impossible to tease that out though - (broomberg) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:53:01 PM EST
                                                                                                         I engaged - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:57:56 PM EST
                                                                                                             Sorry - (broomberg) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 07:01:46 PM EST
                                                                                                                 No reason for that - (bepatient) - Nov. 13, 2005, 07:05:56 PM EST
                                                                                                                 dupe -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 13, 2005, 07:06:29 PM EST
                                                                                                     If there's any 'groupthink' here, Mr. Legal Theoretician - (Ashton) - (19) - Nov. 14, 2005, 05:34:33 AM EST
                                                                                                         conclusions should be made on rationale not gut think - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:20:04 AM EST
                                                                                                         Bullpucky - (bepatient) - (17) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:44:40 AM EST
                                                                                                             No-one's freedom to choose has been taken away. - (pwhysall) - (7) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:46:11 AM EST
                                                                                                                 That is in there - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:49:54 AM EST
                                                                                                                     It's harder to choose because it's not the same. - (pwhysall) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:10:17 AM EST
                                                                                                                         But the access to choose - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:14:56 AM EST
                                                                                                                             By that logic... - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:21:24 AM EST
                                                                                                                                 Chuckle - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:28:37 AM EST
                                                                                                                                 as a matter of fact you might have a hard time keeping them - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:28:41 AM EST
                                                                                                                 either equal access for all or no access for anyone - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:52:09 AM EST
                                                                                                             Suppose this was rural Nevada rather than SF. - (Another Scott) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:21:52 AM EST
                                                                                                                 Its a legal occupation - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:30:51 AM EST
                                                                                                                 prostitution is a venerable profession - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:31:12 AM EST
                                                                                                                     I misread that as... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 05:13:08 PM EST
                                                                                                                         intended this time :-} -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 06:18:01 PM EST
                                                                                                             OK Beep, you've convinced me - (Ashton) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2005, 06:44:26 PM EST
                                                                                                                 WDYHASM? -NT - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:30:56 PM EST
                                                                                                                     (Because it's Broken?) -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:44:37 PM EST
                                                                                                                 Judging by infected computers . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:44:33 PM EST
                                                                 ya might want to check into title 9 etc - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:18:38 PM EST
                                                                     Ya might want to actually read my post - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:25:14 PM EST
                                                     Now wait just a minute! - (imqwerky) - (4) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:10:54 PM EST
                                                         And there you go. - (bepatient) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:20:21 PM EST
                                                         Use the source, Q! - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:35:56 PM EST
                                                             May the Source be with me! -NT - (imqwerky) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:40:45 PM EST
                                                         A hitch is 8 years these days. - (Another Scott) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:22:14 PM EST
                                     Reality check. - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:22:05 AM EST
                                         Let the attacks continue - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:26:06 AM EST
                                             So, you're saying the military doesn't mislead? - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:34:06 AM EST
                                                 Not saying any such thing. - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:40:28 AM EST
                                                     Bad form. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:43:51 AM EST
                                                         And assume - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:45:32 AM EST
                                                             Heh. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:48:51 AM EST
                                                                 Wasn't a claim - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:17:15 PM EST
             The Supreme Court to weigh in on school recruiting. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:32:07 PM EST

iwethey.org
Some have good ideas and some.. just have ideas.
169 ms