IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New But its very much about the timing of conversations
and very much "reasonable" doubt can be cast on this if it turns out his first testimony was accurate...because (iirc) that is the basis of the charges.

Might not get him all the way off...but could seriously damage the SP's case.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Basis of the charges
From my reading of the [link|http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/documents/libby_indictment_28102005.pdf|indictment] , it doesn't appear to matter if someone else spoke to a pre$$titute first. None of the charges are actually concerned with that aspect of timing. If you can find something in the charges that I'm missing, I'd appreciate it if you could point it out.

I do see that I was wrong about one thing though, two of the charges are indeed specifically about lying to the FBI (two counts of making false statement). Those charges aren't affected in any way by Woodward's "bombshell" as they don't mention anything about who was first to speak. They are about "what Libby said" to investigaters about his conversations with reporters.
-----------------------------------------
No new taxes.
--George H. W. Bush

We don't torture.
--George W. Bush
     Fitzgerald calls new grand jury - (JayMehaffey) - (7)
         Actually, it might allow Libby to walk. - (broomberg) - (6)
             Not quite - (Silverlock) - (5)
                 Maybe we heard / read different set of comments. - (broomberg) - (2)
                     What were you listening to? - (Silverlock) - (1)
                         NPR - (broomberg)
                 But its very much about the timing of conversations - (bepatient) - (1)
                     Basis of the charges - (Silverlock)

It's mercifully free of Britney Timberlake, Backstreet II Men, and Whitney Dion.
47 ms