Section HOW MANY?!?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #234,487

by jb4

Picture of jb4

11/16/05 1:39:18 PM

11/16/05 1:40:15 PM

Section HOW MANY?!?

No law, in anything resembling a Democracy (even if in name only) should have 9525 sections!

jb4
shrub●bish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

Edited by jb4 Nov. 16, 2005, 01:40:15 PM EST

Section HOW MANY?!?

No law, in anything resembling a Democracy (even if in name only) should 9525 sections!

jb4
shrub●bish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

Collapse All History

Post #234,493

by Another Scott

11/16/05 1:57:51 PM

It's not that bad.

[link|http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html|Almost], but not quite. It's better than, say, Title VI, Part XI, Sec 13, Subparagraph J2(ii), isn't it?

Cheers,
Scott.

Bill O'Reilly supports terrorists - (andread) - (185) - Nov. 11, 2005, 02:16:27 PM EST

Only SF? - (bepatient) - (184) - Nov. 11, 2005, 03:55:47 PM EST

All or nothing? - (hnick) - (182) - Nov. 11, 2005, 05:26:35 PM EST

Don't be a goof - (bepatient) - (181) - Nov. 11, 2005, 05:32:48 PM EST

How not? - (hnick) - (180) - Nov. 11, 2005, 06:52:57 PM EST

Re: How not? - (bepatient) - (179) - Nov. 11, 2005, 07:06:46 PM EST

What's the death rate of BET employees? - (broomberg) - (93) - Nov. 11, 2005, 07:08:32 PM EST

Black helicopters on way from Ft. Dix to Barry's house. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Nov. 11, 2005, 08:29:26 PM EST

So no police, fire and first responders either? -NT - (bepatient) - (20) - Nov. 11, 2005, 09:57:31 PM EST

Unlikely - (broomberg) - (19) - Nov. 12, 2005, 08:48:32 AM EST

Oh dear - (bepatient) - (18) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:50:42 AM EST

There you go again - (broomberg) - (17) - Nov. 12, 2005, 05:04:05 PM EST

I have in several posts - (bepatient) - (16) - Nov. 12, 2005, 07:55:30 PM EST

Fine - (broomberg) - (12) - Nov. 12, 2005, 07:59:02 PM EST

Until then - (bepatient) - (11) - Nov. 12, 2005, 08:01:11 PM EST

In HS, they aren't 'people'; they are CHILDREN. -NT - (Ashton) - (10) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:53:30 AM EST

Actually, no - (broomberg) - (9) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:09:08 AM EST

Nice ad-hom - (bepatient) - (8) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:32:27 AM EST

While they can't sign until adults - (broomberg) - (7) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:50:36 AM EST

What I've said - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:56:48 AM EST

McDonald's doesn't train kids to kill or be killed - (imqwerky) - (5) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:32:59 PM EST

just blow the wrong gender and instant discharge - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:10:08 PM EST

pun intended? -NT - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:45:18 PM EST

nope, just unintended brilliance! :-) -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:46:07 PM EST

Thank you for proving my point - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 08:18:23 AM EST

Sorta depends on who you ask... - (jb4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:36:21 PM EST

Re: I have in several posts - (jb4) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:32:37 PM EST

Look. - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:00:21 PM EST

Technically not illegal - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:29:18 PM EST

Put it another way... - (pwhysall) - (67) - Nov. 12, 2005, 12:35:05 AM EST

Then no police and no correctional officers - (bepatient) - (66) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:51:52 AM EST

Sounds fair enough to me. -NT - (pwhysall) - (65) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:02:42 AM EST

So then you feel comfortable - (bepatient) - (64) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:30:45 AM EST

Yes, basically. - (pwhysall) - (49) - Nov. 12, 2005, 01:21:09 PM EST

Difference of opinion, then. - (bepatient) - (48) - Nov. 12, 2005, 02:23:19 PM EST

No-one's options are being limited by my point of view. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2005, 03:18:00 PM EST

The brush is a bit broad - (hnick) - Nov. 12, 2005, 04:44:30 PM EST

Ya know, Bill... - (jb4) - (45) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:46:15 PM EST

Re: Ya know, Bill... - (bepatient) - (44) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:04:53 PM EST

There is another POV on this. - (mmoffitt) - (42) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:09:42 PM EST

You're qualifying again - (bepatient) - (38) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:36:55 PM EST

Private != State != Federal. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (20) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:40:45 PM EST

And you continue - (bepatient) - (19) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:45:21 PM EST

It's about States autonomy from this pov. - (mmoffitt) - (18) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:50:03 PM EST

No it isn't. - (bepatient) - (17) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:29:13 PM EST

Again, this time with feeling. - (mmoffitt) - (15) - Nov. 14, 2005, 04:06:01 PM EST

You are mixing things up - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 04:16:15 PM EST

If the Federal Government really wants to, they can - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2005, 05:10:15 PM EST

They can raise armies as needed, but pussy communists - (boxley) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2005, 06:30:59 PM EST

why don't you tell us what you really feel box. - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:26:52 PM EST

pussy communists, where the army cant be used in the US - (boxley) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 08:39:22 PM EST

:-) -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 08:48:19 PM EST

What are you on about? - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:16:48 AM EST

rent a movie called tank -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:29:29 AM EST

That '84 Maverick flick? ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:33:16 AM EST

"by any means necessary" is implied, then? - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Nov. 23, 2005, 11:24:18 AM EST

Not quite ANY means.. - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Nov. 23, 2005, 10:25:51 PM EST

Has that ever been challenged? Did any State try to opt out? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2005, 12:09:40 PM EST

not since 1865 -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2005, 01:08:26 PM EST

Thanks. I meant USSC cases. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 28, 2005, 01:55:45 PM EST

Yes, and I do not know - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 28, 2005, 05:09:24 PM EST

Red Herring alert number 2581 (or so) - (jb4) - Nov. 16, 2005, 01:54:01 PM EST

But, must everybody be allowed to recruit if the Fed is? -NT - (imric) - (16) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:45:28 PM EST

Any specific exclusion should be frowned upon - (bepatient) - (15) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:47:23 PM EST

How about groups that promote violence and killing? - (imric) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:17:46 PM EST

or democrats depending on your point of view -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:27:27 PM EST

Was wondering where that was headed - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 15, 2005, 12:23:00 AM EST

Political parties are not businesses either. - (imric) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:23:15 AM EST

Are they paying now? - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:56:38 AM EST

Yes you did. $300.00 -NT - (imric) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2005, 12:00:26 PM EST

That was my money - (bepatient) - Nov. 15, 2005, 12:23:42 PM EST

How about Al Qaida? CPUSA? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Nov. 15, 2005, 09:19:38 AM EST

What, trying to find somebody I don't like? - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:58:18 AM EST

Nope. Just testing your metal. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 15, 2005, 11:46:37 AM EST

Then here's one for you. - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:11:46 PM EST

You're right - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:13:39 PM EST

NCLB Sec 9525 covers the Boy Scouts. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2005, 10:22:43 PM EST

Section HOW MANY?!? - (jb4) - (1) - Nov. 16, 2005, 01:40:15 PM EST

It's not that bad. - (Another Scott) - Nov. 16, 2005, 01:57:51 PM EST

they take the federal dole, thats why -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:24:32 PM EST

Even that doesn't feature in my reasoning. - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:31:19 PM EST

Not much, they aren't. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2005, 04:07:38 PM EST

Yes I am... - (jb4) - Nov. 16, 2005, 01:43:33 PM EST

Um, that wouldn't be freedom. That'd be indoctrination. - (mmoffitt) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:20:25 AM EST

Next - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:24:09 AM EST

Um, that wouldn't be me. That'd be DHS. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:32:38 AM EST

like what you teach your kids :-) /me dux -NT - (boxley) - (10) - Nov. 14, 2005, 12:34:57 PM EST

I don't teach my kids anything anymore. They teach me. - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:12:40 PM EST

tell me about it - (boxley) - (8) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:32:27 PM EST

If that's true, - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:37:34 PM EST

will be 17 in Jan, link below - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:46:38 PM EST

Thanks. I'll give 'em a gander ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:10:36 PM EST

is it pre-marital if they're not going to get married? -NT - (SpiceWare) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 02:31:48 PM EST

Im afraid to ask :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 03:25:48 PM EST

Well, clarify that before I go show mine the pic. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2005, 04:06:56 PM EST

He didn't give you the whole story - (broomberg) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:52:43 PM EST

Just because he doesn't believe in it . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:57:20 PM EST

In the South? -NT - (imric) - Nov. 12, 2005, 09:40:28 AM EST

That's not gonna fly - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:45:47 AM EDT

Indeed: SHOCK n'AWE competing with GM corner office - - (Ashton) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:00:51 AM EST

Discrimination.. we have to give that up, too? - (Ashton) - (84) - Nov. 12, 2005, 02:59:41 AM EST

Ah, I see. - (bepatient) - (83) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:54:10 AM EST

Yeah, he *is* "SMARTER than THEM". They're KIDS. - (CRConrad) - (74) - Nov. 12, 2005, 06:01:17 PM EST

At 18, I might be smarter... - (bepatient) - (73) - Nov. 12, 2005, 07:59:16 PM EST

So you agree - (imqwerky) - (72) - Nov. 12, 2005, 09:42:12 PM EST

Not so fast dearest - (bepatient) - (71) - Nov. 12, 2005, 09:52:01 PM EST

Re: Not so fast dearest - (andread) - (65) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:02:39 PM EST

Tis a law I believe - (bepatient) - (64) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:04:19 PM EST

Discrimination is not created equal - (ben_tilly) - (63) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:32:26 PM EST

Then you have a poor understanding of what I think - (bepatient) - (60) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:40:49 PM EST

Re-read what you wrote - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:21:06 PM EST

I am of the opinion - (bepatient) - (12) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:50:47 PM EST

My understanding is... - (ben_tilly) - (11) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:34:41 AM EST

Different situation altogether - (bepatient) - (10) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:43:40 AM EST

There's something basic at stake here - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:00:25 AM EST

And I'm telling you that I think its different - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:35:12 AM EST

In short, I'm wasting my breath - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 03:24:50 PM EST

Box gave you one - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:42:27 PM EST

Yes, boxley did. But even if he didn't, you wouldn't have. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:44:58 PM EST

For the stated reasons - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 08:22:49 AM EST

lets try some case law shall we? - (boxley) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:48:18 AM EST

Can you say where that case is from? - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 03:47:26 PM EST

hmm, thought I linked it, here ya go - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:23:24 PM EST

That does look applicable, thanks -NT - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:42:46 PM EST

Sophistry flying under perverse banner, Social Darwinism 101 - (Ashton) - (45) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:52:04 AM EST

Sophistry ? - (bepatient) - (44) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:43:10 AM EST

They can quit McDonalds - (broomberg) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:52:04 AM EST

Because it makes no difference - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:58:47 AM EST

no difference - (andread) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 04:55:51 PM EST

More of a limit - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:44:58 PM EST

I think some people - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 13, 2005, 08:14:53 PM EST

Companies are not the same as the armed forces - (pwhysall) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:26:49 AM EST

Other employers - (imric) - (37) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:57:00 AM EST

See above. -NT - (bepatient) - (36) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:59:22 AM EST

No. - (imric) - (35) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:04:37 PM EST

You continue to hunt for things - (bepatient) - (34) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:20:51 PM EST

No-one's taking any choices away, though. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:44:21 PM EST

Without equal access - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:50:37 PM EST

Yes, adults do know better than children. -NT - (pwhysall) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:32:34 AM EST

Ok, how about this? - (hnick) - (30) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:01:52 PM EST

But but but - (broomberg) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:32:44 PM EST

Their problem. TS as it were... -NT - (hnick) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:38:35 PM EST

I guess I needed the sign -NT - (broomberg) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 02:07:05 PM EST

Me too -NT - (hnick) - Nov. 13, 2005, 02:41:25 PM EST

I'm cool with that. - (bepatient) - (25) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:49:32 PM EST

It was impossible to tease that out though - (broomberg) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:53:01 PM EST

I engaged - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 06:57:56 PM EST

Sorry - (broomberg) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 07:01:46 PM EST

No reason for that - (bepatient) - Nov. 13, 2005, 07:05:56 PM EST

dupe -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 13, 2005, 07:06:29 PM EST

If there's any 'groupthink' here, Mr. Legal Theoretician - (Ashton) - (19) - Nov. 14, 2005, 05:34:33 AM EST

conclusions should be made on rationale not gut think - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:20:04 AM EST

Bullpucky - (bepatient) - (17) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:44:40 AM EST

No-one's freedom to choose has been taken away. - (pwhysall) - (7) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:46:11 AM EST

That is in there - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:49:54 AM EST

It's harder to choose because it's not the same. - (pwhysall) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:10:17 AM EST

But the access to choose - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:14:56 AM EST

By that logic... - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:21:24 AM EST

Chuckle - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:28:37 AM EST

as a matter of fact you might have a hard time keeping them - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:28:41 AM EST

either equal access for all or no access for anyone - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 09:52:09 AM EST

Suppose this was rural Nevada rather than SF. - (Another Scott) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:21:52 AM EST

Its a legal occupation - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:30:51 AM EST

prostitution is a venerable profession - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:31:12 AM EST

I misread that as... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 05:13:08 PM EST

intended this time :-} -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2005, 06:18:01 PM EST

OK Beep, you've convinced me - (Ashton) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2005, 06:44:26 PM EST

WDYHASM? -NT - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:30:56 PM EST

(Because it's Broken?) -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:44:37 PM EST

Judging by infected computers . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Nov. 14, 2005, 07:44:33 PM EST

ya might want to check into title 9 etc - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:18:38 PM EST

Ya might want to actually read my post - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:25:14 PM EST

Now wait just a minute! - (imqwerky) - (4) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:10:54 PM EST

And there you go. - (bepatient) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:20:21 PM EST

Use the source, Q! - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2005, 10:35:56 PM EST

May the Source be with me! -NT - (imqwerky) - Nov. 12, 2005, 11:40:45 PM EST

A hitch is 8 years these days. - (Another Scott) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:22:14 PM EST

Reality check. - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:22:05 AM EST

Let the attacks continue - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:26:06 AM EST

So, you're saying the military doesn't mislead? - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:34:06 AM EST

Not saying any such thing. - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:40:28 AM EST

Bad form. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:43:51 AM EST

And assume - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:45:32 AM EST

Heh. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2005, 11:48:51 AM EST

Wasn't a claim - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2005, 01:17:15 PM EST

The Supreme Court to weigh in on school recruiting. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Nov. 14, 2005, 10:32:07 PM EST

Only Olaf Stapledon ever succeeded on this kind of scale, and Olaf Stapledon is dead.
178 ms