IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New OK Beep, you've convinced me
Of what is needed to level the playing field. It IS now 2005 and not 1776, before Persuasion became a $Growth$ Industry, staffed by legions of mercenaries with the same level of conscience as your 'strict construction' Scalia argument displays.

Premise:
IF.. in '05 - a 17 yo has not yet figured out that *everyone* with something to Sell is Lying -??- (by omission if not commission) in his/her selective-data presentations:

Perhaps that naif *IS* Just the sort of malleable cannon fodder we shall need more and More-of, to bring US-defined 'Democracy' to Everyone; by all means possible (whether or not practicable.) You appear to be onboard with this view. You, Ayn and and Mr. John Galt.

Initial solution:
The clear next step then, in refining this Open-to-Every-POV process, is:

Each Presenter's table has, (placed a decent audio-space away) a Second table - staffed by any group which wishes to deconstruct the messages from the Main table, employ whatever persuasion techniques as they care to employ / as does the Presenter.

(Headphones, etc. lest duelling audio cancel-out Both sides)

This policy would ensure (at least) two aspects of all 'recruitment' on any *school campus* anywhere:

Conditions:
A) Each student is reminded, properly: to weigh the fact that All Presenters are Salesmen and are minimizing that which you would not Like to find out only.. AFTER it is Too Late.

Presenters are magnifying that which you'd Like to believe -- but in practice, you may have SIGNED-away your chances ever, of Enforcing.
[The reason there should also be a lawyer assigned to Each Child, in order to clarify the often weasel-words in the Promises.] 'Course that would cost some money once pro-bono was exhausted, but WTF - what's a 'child' worth?

B) Each student also is reminded that, No Job! is *without* its negatives; some of these negatives may place your life (or your mental health or both) in far more jeopardy than you can possibly guess - at AGE 17. 'Death' may be less onerous a risk than quadriplegia - for just one example.
(Hell, you can die when your Pinto gets nudged at 20 mph, enroute to the Finest-grade imitation-leather cubicle..)

(And, re a Military career: screen before Recruitment Day - Johnny Got His Gun and preferably, too: The Green Table ballet, for a change of Media - as a small sop for the fact that these are indeed, 'Children' being hustled by Pros.)

(Oh, equivalency for the Corporate ladder to climb: every student gets, if wanted - a tour of the largest local Cubicle Farm, preferably to silently observe ... ... for a period of several hours; a second trip if requested.)

Of course, were this realized - there might be more candidates for Monasteries, but W.T.F.

WITHOUT (A + B): I aver that your 'principle' remains as simplistically Boolean as when proffered and, like the ostrich - its position remains both vulgar and vulnerable.



Ashton,

CIEIO -
The OTHER Side, LLC


War is Good (for) Bizness: Invest Your Son/Daughter/Ward -
But FIRST: pay us some Conscience money, so when you visit the kid later, in the rehab clinic - you can say, Well, we tried to warn you - remember?



tysop
Collapse Edited by Ashton Nov. 14, 2005, 06:44:26 PM EST
OK Beep, you've convinced me
Of what is needed to level the playing field. It IS now 2005 and not 1776, before Persuasion became a $Growth$ Industry, staffed by legions of mercenaries with the same level of conscience as your 'strict construction' Scalia argument displays.

Premise:
IF.. in '05 - a 17 yo has not yet figured out that *everyone* with something to Sell is Lying -??- (by omission if not commission) in his/her selective-data presentations:

Perhaps that naif *IS* Just the sort of malleable cannon fodder we shall need more and More-of, to bring US-defined 'Democracy' to Everyone; by all means possible (whether or not practicable.) You appear to be onboard with this view. You, Ayn and and Mr. John Galt.

Initial solution:
The clear next step then, in refining this Open-to-Every-POV process, is:

Each Presenter's table has, (placed a decent audio-space away) a Second table - staffed by any group which wishes to deconstruct the messages from the Main table, employ whatever persuasion techniques as they care to employ / as does the Presenter.

(Headphones, etc. lest duelling audio cancel-out Both sides)

This policy would ensure (at least) two aspects of all 'recruitment' on any *school campus* anywhere:

Conditions:
A) Each student is reminded, properly: to weigh the fact that All Presenters are Salesmen and are minimizing that which you would not Like to find out only.. AFTER it is Too Late.

Presenters are magnifying that which you'd Like to believe -- but in practice, you may have SIGNED-away your chances ever, of Enforcing.
[The reason there should also be a lawyer assigned to Each Child, in order to clarify the often weasel-words in the Promises.] 'Course that would cost some money once pro-bono was exhausted, but WTF - what's a 'child' worth?

B) Each student also is reminded that, No Job! is *without* its negatives; some of these negatives may place your life (or your mental health or both) in far more jeopardy than you can possibly guess - at AGE 17. 'Death' may be less onerous a risk than quadriplegia - for just one example.
(Hell, you can die when your Pinto gets nudged at 20 mph, enroute to the Finest-grade imitation-leather cubicle..)

(And, re a Military career: screen before Recruitment Day - Johnny Got His Gun</B and preferably, too: The Green Table ballet, for a change of Media - as a small sop for the fact that these are indeed, 'Children' being hustled by Pros.)

(Oh, equivalency for the Corporate ladder to climb: every student gets, if wanted - a tour of the largest local Cubicle Farm, preferably to silently observe ... ... for a period of several hours; a second trip if requested.)

Of course, were this realized - there might be more candidates for Monasteries, but W.T.F.

WITHOUT (A + B): I aver that your 'principle' remains as simplistically Boolean as when proffered and, like the ostrich - its position remains both vulgar and vulnerable.



Ashton,

CIEIO -
The OTHER Side, LLC






War is Good (for) Bizness: Invest Your Son/Daughter/Ward -
But FIRST: pay us some Conscience money, so when you visit the kid later, in the rehab clinic - you can say, Well, we tried to warn you - remember?
New WDYHASM?
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Expand Edited by bepatient Nov. 14, 2005, 07:30:29 PM EST
Expand Edited by bepatient Nov. 14, 2005, 07:30:56 PM EST
New (Because it's Broken?)

New Judging by infected computers . . .
. . today's kids don't develop a suspicion of the word "free" until they're about 24 years old. I suspect their suspicion of other sales pitches is similarly weak until that age.

Naturally, our government is anxious to recruit the required quota of canon fodder from the 18 to 23 year olds, because beyond that it's "game over". I'm sure they'd recruit them at 12 years if they could - boy could they make hay then!
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
     Bill O'Reilly supports terrorists - (andread) - (185)
         Only SF? - (bepatient) - (184)
             All or nothing? - (hnick) - (182)
                 Don't be a goof - (bepatient) - (181)
                     How not? - (hnick) - (180)
                         Re: How not? - (bepatient) - (179)
                             What's the death rate of BET employees? - (broomberg) - (93)
                                 Black helicopters on way from Ft. Dix to Barry's house. -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                                 So no police, fire and first responders either? -NT - (bepatient) - (20)
                                     Unlikely - (broomberg) - (19)
                                         Oh dear - (bepatient) - (18)
                                             There you go again - (broomberg) - (17)
                                                 I have in several posts - (bepatient) - (16)
                                                     Fine - (broomberg) - (12)
                                                         Until then - (bepatient) - (11)
                                                             In HS, they aren't 'people'; they are CHILDREN. -NT - (Ashton) - (10)
                                                                 Actually, no - (broomberg) - (9)
                                                                     Nice ad-hom - (bepatient) - (8)
                                                                         While they can't sign until adults - (broomberg) - (7)
                                                                             What I've said - (bepatient) - (6)
                                                                                 McDonald's doesn't train kids to kill or be killed - (imqwerky) - (5)
                                                                                     just blow the wrong gender and instant discharge - (boxley) - (2)
                                                                                         pun intended? -NT - (SpiceWare) - (1)
                                                                                             nope, just unintended brilliance! :-) -NT - (boxley)
                                                                                     Thank you for proving my point - (bepatient)
                                                                                     Sorta depends on who you ask... - (jb4)
                                                     Re: I have in several posts - (jb4) - (2)
                                                         Look. - (bepatient)
                                                         Technically not illegal - (Simon_Jester)
                                 Put it another way... - (pwhysall) - (67)
                                     Then no police and no correctional officers - (bepatient) - (66)
                                         Sounds fair enough to me. -NT - (pwhysall) - (65)
                                             So then you feel comfortable - (bepatient) - (64)
                                                 Yes, basically. - (pwhysall) - (49)
                                                     Difference of opinion, then. - (bepatient) - (48)
                                                         No-one's options are being limited by my point of view. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                             The brush is a bit broad - (hnick)
                                                         Ya know, Bill... - (jb4) - (45)
                                                             Re: Ya know, Bill... - (bepatient) - (44)
                                                                 There is another POV on this. - (mmoffitt) - (42)
                                                                     You're qualifying again - (bepatient) - (38)
                                                                         Private != State != Federal. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (20)
                                                                             And you continue - (bepatient) - (19)
                                                                                 It's about States autonomy from this pov. - (mmoffitt) - (18)
                                                                                     No it isn't. - (bepatient) - (17)
                                                                                         Again, this time with feeling. - (mmoffitt) - (15)
                                                                                             You are mixing things up - (bepatient)
                                                                                             If the Federal Government really wants to, they can - (ben_tilly) - (13)
                                                                                                 They can raise armies as needed, but pussy communists - (boxley) - (6)
                                                                                                     why don't you tell us what you really feel box. - (bepatient) - (5)
                                                                                                         pussy communists, where the army cant be used in the US - (boxley) - (4)
                                                                                                             :-) -NT - (bepatient)
                                                                                                             What are you on about? - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                                                                 rent a movie called tank -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                                                     That '84 Maverick flick? ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                                                                 "by any means necessary" is implied, then? - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                                                                                                     Not quite ANY means.. - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                                                                                                         Has that ever been challenged? Did any State try to opt out? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                                                                                             not since 1865 -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                                                 Thanks. I meant USSC cases. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                                                                             Yes, and I do not know - (ben_tilly)
                                                                                         Red Herring alert number 2581 (or so) - (jb4)
                                                                         But, must everybody be allowed to recruit if the Fed is? -NT - (imric) - (16)
                                                                             Any specific exclusion should be frowned upon - (bepatient) - (15)
                                                                                 How about groups that promote violence and killing? - (imric) - (6)
                                                                                     or democrats depending on your point of view -NT - (boxley)
                                                                                     Was wondering where that was headed - (bepatient) - (4)
                                                                                         Political parties are not businesses either. - (imric) - (3)
                                                                                             Are they paying now? - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                                                                 Yes you did. $300.00 -NT - (imric) - (1)
                                                                                                     That was my money - (bepatient)
                                                                                 How about Al Qaida? CPUSA? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                                                                                     What, trying to find somebody I don't like? - (bepatient) - (6)
                                                                                         Nope. Just testing your metal. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                                                         Then here's one for you. - (a6l6e6x) - (4)
                                                                                             You're right - (bepatient) - (3)
                                                                                                 NCLB Sec 9525 covers the Boy Scouts. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                                                     Section HOW MANY?!? - (jb4) - (1)
                                                                                                         It's not that bad. - (Another Scott)
                                                                     they take the federal dole, thats why -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                                                                         Even that doesn't feature in my reasoning. - (bepatient)
                                                                         Not much, they aren't. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                                 Yes I am... - (jb4)
                                                 Um, that wouldn't be freedom. That'd be indoctrination. - (mmoffitt) - (13)
                                                     Next - (bepatient) - (1)
                                                         Um, that wouldn't be me. That'd be DHS. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                     like what you teach your kids :-) /me dux -NT - (boxley) - (10)
                                                         I don't teach my kids anything anymore. They teach me. - (mmoffitt) - (9)
                                                             tell me about it - (boxley) - (8)
                                                                 If that's true, - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                     will be 17 in Jan, link below - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         Thanks. I'll give 'em a gander ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                                 is it pre-marital if they're not going to get married? -NT - (SpiceWare) - (2)
                                                                     Im afraid to ask :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         Well, clarify that before I go show mine the pic. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                                 He didn't give you the whole story - (broomberg)
                                                                 Just because he doesn't believe in it . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                 In the South? -NT - (imric)
                                 That's not gonna fly - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                                     Indeed: SHOCK n'AWE competing with GM corner office - - (Ashton)
                             Discrimination.. we have to give that up, too? - (Ashton) - (84)
                                 Ah, I see. - (bepatient) - (83)
                                     Yeah, he *is* "SMARTER than THEM". They're KIDS. - (CRConrad) - (74)
                                         At 18, I might be smarter... - (bepatient) - (73)
                                             So you agree - (imqwerky) - (72)
                                                 Not so fast dearest - (bepatient) - (71)
                                                     Re: Not so fast dearest - (andread) - (65)
                                                         Tis a law I believe - (bepatient) - (64)
                                                             Discrimination is not created equal - (ben_tilly) - (63)
                                                                 Then you have a poor understanding of what I think - (bepatient) - (60)
                                                                     Re-read what you wrote - (ben_tilly) - (13)
                                                                         I am of the opinion - (bepatient) - (12)
                                                                             My understanding is... - (ben_tilly) - (11)
                                                                                 Different situation altogether - (bepatient) - (10)
                                                                                     There's something basic at stake here - (ben_tilly) - (9)
                                                                                         And I'm telling you that I think its different - (bepatient) - (4)
                                                                                             In short, I'm wasting my breath - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                                                                                                 Box gave you one - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                                                                     Yes, boxley did. But even if he didn't, you wouldn't have. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                                                                                         For the stated reasons - (bepatient)
                                                                                         lets try some case law shall we? - (boxley) - (3)
                                                                                             Can you say where that case is from? - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                                                                                 hmm, thought I linked it, here ya go - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                                     That does look applicable, thanks -NT - (ben_tilly)
                                                                     Sophistry flying under perverse banner, Social Darwinism 101 - (Ashton) - (45)
                                                                         Sophistry ? - (bepatient) - (44)
                                                                             They can quit McDonalds - (broomberg) - (4)
                                                                                 Because it makes no difference - (bepatient) - (3)
                                                                                     no difference - (andread) - (2)
                                                                                         More of a limit - (bepatient) - (1)
                                                                                             I think some people - (Simon_Jester)
                                                                             Companies are not the same as the armed forces - (pwhysall)
                                                                             Other employers - (imric) - (37)
                                                                                 See above. -NT - (bepatient) - (36)
                                                                                     No. - (imric) - (35)
                                                                                         You continue to hunt for things - (bepatient) - (34)
                                                                                             No-one's taking any choices away, though. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                                                                                 Without equal access - (bepatient) - (1)
                                                                                                     Yes, adults do know better than children. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                                                                             Ok, how about this? - (hnick) - (30)
                                                                                                 But but but - (broomberg) - (3)
                                                                                                     Their problem. TS as it were... -NT - (hnick) - (2)
                                                                                                         I guess I needed the sign -NT - (broomberg) - (1)
                                                                                                             Me too -NT - (hnick)
                                                                                                 I'm cool with that. - (bepatient) - (25)
                                                                                                     It was impossible to tease that out though - (broomberg) - (4)
                                                                                                         I engaged - (bepatient) - (3)
                                                                                                             Sorry - (broomberg) - (2)
                                                                                                                 No reason for that - (bepatient)
                                                                                                                 dupe -NT - (bepatient)
                                                                                                     If there's any 'groupthink' here, Mr. Legal Theoretician - (Ashton) - (19)
                                                                                                         conclusions should be made on rationale not gut think - (boxley)
                                                                                                         Bullpucky - (bepatient) - (17)
                                                                                                             No-one's freedom to choose has been taken away. - (pwhysall) - (7)
                                                                                                                 That is in there - (bepatient) - (5)
                                                                                                                     It's harder to choose because it's not the same. - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                                                                                         But the access to choose - (bepatient) - (3)
                                                                                                                             By that logic... - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                                                                                                                 Chuckle - (bepatient)
                                                                                                                                 as a matter of fact you might have a hard time keeping them - (boxley)
                                                                                                                 either equal access for all or no access for anyone - (boxley)
                                                                                                             Suppose this was rural Nevada rather than SF. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                                                                                 Its a legal occupation - (bepatient)
                                                                                                                 prostitution is a venerable profession - (boxley) - (2)
                                                                                                                     I misread that as... - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                                                                                                         intended this time :-} -NT - (boxley)
                                                                                                             OK Beep, you've convinced me - (Ashton) - (3)
                                                                                                                 WDYHASM? -NT - (bepatient) - (1)
                                                                                                                     (Because it's Broken?) -NT - (Ashton)
                                                                                                                 Judging by infected computers . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                                                 ya might want to check into title 9 etc - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                     Ya might want to actually read my post - (ben_tilly)
                                                     Now wait just a minute! - (imqwerky) - (4)
                                                         And there you go. - (bepatient)
                                                         Use the source, Q! - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                             May the Source be with me! -NT - (imqwerky)
                                                         A hitch is 8 years these days. - (Another Scott)
                                     Reality check. - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                                         Let the attacks continue - (bepatient) - (6)
                                             So, you're saying the military doesn't mislead? - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                                                 Not saying any such thing. - (bepatient) - (4)
                                                     Bad form. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                                         And assume - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                             Heh. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                                 Wasn't a claim - (bepatient)
             The Supreme Court to weigh in on school recruiting. (new thread) - (Another Scott)

Then again you wonder how certain people sign their names to anything and still choose to leave the house.
162 ms