My post was an enquiry, not a stroking of ego
I declared Dembski insane because I cannot see the mechanism of how Christology can be applied to theories of phenomenon. I cannot see how anyone would think that it might be applicable. I can see why people might choose the bible to explain the existence of life but not why someone applies an ideal person to natural processes. I am not interested in being smug, I am interested in understanding thought processes.
Neither am I saying that ID is delusional because of a single nut. I regard the advocates of ID as delusional because ID itself is delusional but that's another thread.
Matthew Greet
Choose Life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a fucking big television, choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol, and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose DIY and wondering who the fuck you are on a Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing fucking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pishing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, fucked up brats you spawned to replace yourself. Choose your future. Choose life... But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose life. I chose somethin' else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got heroin?
- Mark Renton, Trainspotting.
