Influenza, anyone? - (Ashton) - (30) - Oct. 12, 2005, 05:03:40 PM EDT
         Run! Get out... umm... what about the subordinates? - (warmachine) - (29) - Oct. 12, 2005, 06:13:16 PM EDT
             we are using the Soviet Model -NT - (boxley) - (28) - Oct. 12, 2005, 07:07:04 PM EDT
                 Not familiar with that -NT - (warmachine) - (27) - Oct. 13, 2005, 02:29:35 AM EDT
                     here ya go, enjoy - (boxley) - (26) - Oct. 13, 2005, 11:37:08 AM EDT
                         The subordinates are the problem - (warmachine) - (4) - Oct. 13, 2005, 12:55:55 PM EDT
                             The decline has been fast - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Oct. 13, 2005, 01:09:59 PM EDT
                                 So that article is a pack of lies. Oh, I'm surprised! - (warmachine) - (2) - Oct. 13, 2005, 07:16:26 PM EDT
                                     Umm.. let's not get Ahead of the Game, OK? - (Ashton) - Oct. 13, 2005, 08:09:16 PM EDT
                                     Who says it is a pack of lies? - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 13, 2005, 09:06:43 PM EDT
                         Gads, that was depressing. Good, but depressing. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (20) - Oct. 13, 2005, 01:08:06 PM EDT
                             He spent a lot of time saying what was wrong. - (static) - (19) - Oct. 14, 2005, 12:05:02 AM EDT
                                 He made it clear what his alternate solution was - (ben_tilly) - (18) - Oct. 15, 2005, 04:43:46 AM EDT
                                     That was clear? - (static) - (17) - Oct. 14, 2005, 12:15:05 AM EDT
                                         It was to me - (ben_tilly) - (16) - Oct. 14, 2005, 12:29:11 AM EDT
                                             Yup. Was clear in the 1st paragraph with ref to the Soviets. -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 14, 2005, 12:33:25 AM EDT
                                             Are you now, then, agreeing with me? - (bepatient) - (12) - Oct. 14, 2005, 12:34:25 AM EDT
                                                 Aggreeing with you on what? -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 14, 2005, 12:48:00 AM EDT
                                                 You are assuming he agrees - (imric) - (10) - Oct. 14, 2005, 07:03:53 AM EDT
                                                     Oh I know. - (bepatient) - Oct. 14, 2005, 12:52:04 PM EDT
                                                     And that was a bad assumption - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Oct. 14, 2005, 04:29:40 PM EDT
                                                         *chuckle* - (imric) - (7) - Oct. 14, 2005, 04:47:23 PM EDT
                                                             One of us made a sign error -NT - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Oct. 14, 2005, 05:01:54 PM EDT
                                                                 Both? Cancelling out? -NT - (imric) - (4) - Oct. 14, 2005, 05:39:38 PM EDT
                                                                     Nope... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Oct. 14, 2005, 06:12:34 PM EDT
                                                                         My "don't disagree?" - (imric) - (2) - Oct. 15, 2005, 02:14:19 AM EDT
                                                                             D'oh, I know what I MEANT to write... -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 15, 2005, 04:33:26 AM EDT
                                                                                 Heehee - (imric) - Oct. 15, 2005, 10:52:43 AM EDT
                                                                 Well, and odd number of sign errors anyway -NT - (drewk) - Oct. 15, 2005, 11:17:37 PM EDT
                                             I must not be his target audience. -NT - (static) - (1) - Oct. 14, 2005, 01:43:31 AM EDT
                                                 I guess I'm sensitive to the buzzwords he used. -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 14, 2005, 04:30:05 PM EDT