with chirac clinton kerry all agrreing on WMD's being

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #229,448 by boxley 10/13/05 11:27:59 AM Reply	with chirac clinton kerry all agrreing on WMD's being in Iraq gonna be real hard to pin it on him. We all know why he really went in but the public reason was echoed by enemies and friends alike, thanx, bill "the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #229,450 by inthane-chan 10/13/05 11:28:49 AM Reply	Based on information HIS administration posted...
Post #229,451 by boxley 10/13/05 11:29:57 AM Reply	no, clinton bombed Iraq as well "the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #229,467 by ben_tilly 10/13/05 1:15:42 PM Reply	Clinton bombed Iraq for different reasons I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #229,530 by Simon_Jester 10/13/05 11:34:08 PM Reply	But bombing isn't the same as invading.... as we now can easily see (how many American lives lost during bombing vs how many American lives lost during invasion/peacekeeping mission). You know what's really sad? I've heard the right go on for YEARS about how are military is good at one thing - killing the enemy. They blasted past Presidents for "peace keeping" missions because our troops weren't international policemen. And now that Bush is doing...you haven't heard a damn peep out of them.
Post #229,587 by Ashton 10/14/05 4:21:32 PM Reply	Hell.. He RAN! on "no nation building.." CHA CHA CHA
Post #229,461 by JayMehaffey 10/13/05 12:24:52 PM Reply	Really what was it? We all know why he really went in but the public reason was echoed by enemies and friends alike, Really, what was the reason? I've thought about it quite a bit and I keep coming up with too many plausible reasons to settle on one. As for pinning it on Bush, that will be hard. But there is a chance that the Plame investigation might do it. The Plame investigation could spill over into an investigation of where the information that started Wilson's investigation came from. It is generally believed at this point that somebody who was a member of PNAC or close to them created and planted the reports that the Italian service feed to the US. If that circle can be traced back to it's source, it could blow up horribly. Jay
Post #229,471 by boxley 10/13/05 3:06:22 PM Reply	he couldnt find osama, so attacked the Indians he could find Old American War strategy thanx, bill "the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #229,481 by JayMehaffey 10/13/05 4:25:42 PM Reply	Probably one factor That is probably one factor. But the plans to invade Iraq where already in motion before it became clear that catching bin Laden was not going to happen. It has been reported that Blair actually had to work to stop the US from invading Iraq before / along with Afganistan. Jay

WOW! (if true-enough?): 50% say Impeach IF__lied-into-Iraq - (Ashton) - (9) - Oct. 13, 2005, 03:29:07 AM EDT

with chirac clinton kerry all agrreing on WMD's being - (boxley) - (8) - Oct. 13, 2005, 11:27:59 AM EDT

Based on information HIS administration posted... -NT - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Oct. 13, 2005, 11:28:49 AM EDT

no, clinton bombed Iraq as well -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Oct. 13, 2005, 11:29:57 AM EDT

Clinton bombed Iraq for different reasons -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 13, 2005, 01:15:42 PM EDT

But bombing isn't the same as invading.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2005, 11:34:08 PM EDT

Hell.. He RAN! on "no nation building.." CHA CHA CHA -NT - (Ashton) - Oct. 14, 2005, 04:21:32 PM EDT

Really what was it? - (JayMehaffey) - (2) - Oct. 13, 2005, 12:24:52 PM EDT

he couldnt find osama, so attacked the Indians he could find - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2005, 03:06:22 PM EDT

Probably one factor - (JayMehaffey) - Oct. 13, 2005, 04:25:42 PM EDT

iwethey.org

I was trying to read your bio when it got chucked clear off the screen by a Jimmy Dean sausage pancake.
44 ms