Solaris 10 x86 vendor support
- (admin)
- (21)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 07:21:00 PM EDT
Don't expect it to get any better
- (broomberg)
- (1)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 07:27:29 PM EDT
It's not the same effort.
- (admin)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 07:30:38 PM EDT
thanx
- (boxley)
- (8)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 07:28:20 PM EDT
Who told you?
- (admin)
- (3)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 07:32:04 PM EDT
let me sniff around tomorrow
-NT
- (boxley)
- (2)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 07:33:16 PM EDT
Thanks.
- (admin)
- (1)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 07:34:45 PM EDT
we have sun paid evangelists onsite :-)
-NT
- (boxley)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 11:00:39 PM EDT
Sun may be betting the farm on it...
- (ben_tilly)
- (3)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 07:54:35 PM EDT
Agreed
- (broomberg)
- (2)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 08:38:40 PM EDT
sure but if solaris is opensource?
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 11:03:40 PM EDT
Won't matter
- (broomberg)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 11:33:25 PM EDT
Can someone give the abridged description of "endian"? (new thread)
- (drewk)
- Oct. 11, 2005, 08:54:31 PM EDT
Linux Application Environment
- (boxley)
- (8)
- Oct. 12, 2005, 10:20:56 AM EDT
Thanks.
- (admin)
- Oct. 12, 2005, 11:54:22 AM EDT
lxrun != LAE
- (admin)
- (6)
- Oct. 12, 2005, 12:19:25 PM EDT
yes it is :-(
- (boxley)
- (5)
- Oct. 12, 2005, 12:42:09 PM EDT
Not according to Sun
- (admin)
- (4)
- Oct. 12, 2005, 12:50:36 PM EDT
" LAE is supposed to be kernel-level support"
- (boxley)
- (3)
- Oct. 12, 2005, 02:26:17 PM EDT
Re: " LAE is supposed to be kernel-level support"
- (admin)
- (2)
- Oct. 12, 2005, 03:29:29 PM EDT
just repeating what the insider is telling me
-NT
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Oct. 12, 2005, 03:46:49 PM EDT
Moot point until they release LAE anyways.
- (admin)
- Oct. 12, 2005, 04:35:28 PM EDT
