Why Intelligent Design is going to win

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #228,806 by Arkadiy 10/9/05 10:08:08 PM 10/9/05 10:08:28 PM Reply	Why Intelligent Design is going to win 5 reasons listed. The reason that ID is actually a correct theory is not listed among them. Regardless of what I think about a particular theory, people who decide the truth by vote or by convenience are beyond contemnpt. (oops, here is the link: [link\|http://www.techcentralstation.com/100705C.html\|http://www.techcentr....com/100705C.html]) ------ 179. I will not outsource core functions. -- [link\|http://omega.med.yale.edu/~pcy5/misc/overlord2.htm\|.] Edited by Arkadiy Oct. 9, 2005, 10:08:28 PM EDT Why Intelligent Design is going to win 5 reasons listed. The reason that ID is actually a correct theory is not listed among them. Regardless of what I think about a particular theory, people who decide the truth by vote or by convenience are beyond contemnpt. ------ 179. I will not outsource core functions. -- [link\|http://omega.med.yale.edu/~pcy5/misc/overlord2.htm\|.] Collapse All History
Post #228,807 by ben_tilly 10/9/05 10:12:22 PM Reply	Item #3 is why ID is not scientific I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #228,875 by boxley 10/10/05 10:12:32 AM Reply	agreed, the just because theory "the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #228,820 by imqwerky 10/9/05 11:00:27 PM Reply	IRLRPD (new thread) Created as new thread #228819 titled [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=228819\|IRLRPD] Oh Freddled Gruntbuggly!
Post #228,945 by tuberculosis 10/10/05 3:04:15 PM Reply	That's the whiner who said engineering school is too hard and became a lawyer. Whatever dude. Why ID will lose: It postulates a designer. The entire thing collapses should the designer not be found. The designer's existence must be taken "on faith". The founding fathers were pretty clear on the position of faith in the US. [link\|http://www.theology.edu/journal/volume2/ushistor.htm\|http://www.theology....ume2/ushistor.htm] It is quite possible that ID will infest the red states, but one suspects the red states are re-evaluating their politics as their machine begins to crumble. It will never succeed in the blue regions. "Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" --Mark Twain "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." --Albert Einstein "This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses." --George W. Bush

Why Intelligent Design is going to win - (Arkadiy) - (4) - Oct. 9, 2005, 10:08:28 PM EDT

Item #3 is why ID is not scientific -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 9, 2005, 10:12:22 PM EDT

agreed, the just because theory -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 10, 2005, 10:12:32 AM EDT

IRLRPD (new thread) - (imqwerky) - Oct. 9, 2005, 11:00:27 PM EDT

That's the whiner who said engineering school is too hard - (tuberculosis) - Oct. 10, 2005, 03:04:15 PM EDT

iwethey.org

+++ATH
36 ms