IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New SSH v. OpenSSH
Both implementations have had issues. The exposure window on OpenSSH seems to be smaller -- bugs found are fixed faster. You have to stay up on your updates, natch.
--
Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]
[link|http://kmself.ix.netcom.com/|[link|http://kmself.ix.netcom.com/"|http://kmself.ix.netcom.com/"]]
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?
New Re: SSH v. OpenSSH

That was my feeling as well. I also lean towards the OSS version so as to avoid depending on the viability of a single commercial vendor.

In fact, our classroom installs had OpenSSL/OpenSSH already installed and I took the class through updating both, citing the need to keep current, especially with security-related software.

Actually, this is part of a guerrilla effort on my part to establish proof-of-concept for OSS as part of our college LAN infrastructure as well as to show students how they can put together a very functional chunk of network (DNS, e-mail, etc.) for very little cost and not that much more effort than a commercial solution, at least for basic services.
Tom Sinclair
Speaker-to-Suits

Most people in Lancre, as the saying goes, went to bed with the chickens
and got up with the cows. [footnote: Er. That is to say, they went to bed
at the same time as the chickens went to bed, and got up at the same time
as the cows got up. Loosely worded sayings can really cause
misunderstandings.]
-- (Terry Pratchett, Maskerade)
     Random thoughts while installing RH 7.2 ( a little long) - (tjsinclair) - (5)
         Xinetd tutorial - (pwhysall) - (1)
             Re: Xinetd tutorial (also a bit long) - (tjsinclair)
         Maybe blasphemous, but - (broomberg) - (2)
             SSH v. OpenSSH - (kmself) - (1)
                 Re: SSH v. OpenSSH - (tjsinclair)

I swear it’s their damn business model.
61 ms