IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Because it's cover
Post #225,352
by JayMehaffey
9/18/05 7:08:12 PM
Reply
New Because it's cover
They could easly put the students in parochial school without using vouchers. In fact it would be easier for the government to pay the schools directly. Less open to abuse, faster and legally less questionable.

But the Republicans are more interested in getting a succesful voucher program then they are in teaching the students.

Jay
Post #225,374
by imqwerky
Picture of imqwerky
9/18/05 9:41:30 PM
Reply
New Ed Zachary
Exploiting a disaster as a means of circumventing the legislative branch is downright criminal. Vouchers is an issue that should be voted on by the taxpayers. And taxpayers, for the most part, say "NO!" It is no less repugnant than a scam Katrina fundraiser. "Thanks for the money...Sucker!"

Like Jay said, transparency is the way to go. Oh, sorry, we're talking about the Bush Gov't. My bad.

Anybody wanna buy a piece of the Brooklyn Bridge?
Amy

Pray for the survivors of Bush.
     Those Sneaky Repubs. TTFW. - (imqwerky) - (4) - Sept. 17, 2005, 12:11:20 AM EDT
         Still surprised that 'shame' is not in their vocabulary? -NT - (Ashton) - Sept. 17, 2005, 06:15:17 AM EDT
         why must nea union members only teach schools? - (boxley) - (2) - Sept. 18, 2005, 11:23:52 AM EDT
             Because it's cover - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Sept. 18, 2005, 07:08:12 PM EDT
                 Ed Zachary - (imqwerky) - Sept. 18, 2005, 09:41:30 PM EDT

SYS$BLASPHEMER!
54 ms