IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Linux Forum / Exactly the kind of response I expected.
Post #218,275
by folkert
Picture of folkert
8/8/05 9:35:15 PM
Reply
New Exactly the kind of response I expected.
You are missing the entire point.

If you profit from giving access to your modifications through a service charge, then you have distributed access to those binaries, though on your machine, you still are breaking the spirit of the GPLv2.

Therefore the GPLv3 is addressing it.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
[image|http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg||||]
Post #218,282
by imric
8/8/05 10:00:19 PM
Reply
New Horsecrap.
The binaries have not gone anywhare; the SOFTWARE has not been distributed.
[link|http://www.runningworks.com|
]
Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 


Post #218,301
by Andrew Grygus
Picture of Andrew Grygus
8/8/05 10:52:35 PM
Reply
New The binaries have not been distributed . . .
. . but the effect of Web services is as if binaries have been distributed. Many outside users are accessing those binaries which are modifications of GPL'd code without any benefit having been returned to the writers of the original code or to the community.

It is easy to see why the FSF considers this a loophole, especially given the increase expected in Web services, so I suspect this clause will be kept. Providers of Web services will need to find another way to achieve a return from their modifications than by keeping them secret. Those that figure out some other value will be key beneficiaries.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
Post #218,302
by imric
8/8/05 10:53:45 PM
Reply
New And then GPL4.
Brett Glass was right.
[link|http://www.runningworks.com|
]
Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 


Post #218,364
by tonytib
8/9/05 11:09:09 AM
Reply
New Or most OSS used for web services won't be GPL3
     This has been bugging me. - (imric) - (72) - Aug. 8, 2005, 01:28:30 PM EDT
         It's the usual cack. - (pwhysall) - (13) - Aug. 8, 2005, 01:58:45 PM EDT
             Nonsense, Peter. - (imric) - (12) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:19:00 PM EDT
                 I repeat. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:27:25 PM EDT
                     I care about this, Peter. - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:38:01 PM EDT
                         I don't doubt that you care. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:44:15 PM EDT
                             It's true that it may be less of a problem - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:53:44 PM EDT
                 the fact that you dont distribute your software - (boxley) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:32:11 PM EDT
                     disgruntled >>--> Whistleblower laws. -NT - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:39:50 PM EDT
                 Also, looky here: - (pwhysall) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:32:33 PM EDT
                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:41:18 PM EDT
                     Woo hoo. - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:42:17 PM EDT
                         Remember, existing GPLv2 software will remain GPLv2 - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:46:09 PM EDT
                             ROFL - just posted that is a mitigating factor... - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:54:36 PM EDT
                     He who controls the compiler... - (ChrisR) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:49:32 PM EDT
         How is it ridiculous? - (JayMehaffey) - (36) - Aug. 8, 2005, 03:49:56 PM EDT
             Bravo. -NT - (folkert) - (23) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:01:32 PM EDT
                 Guess you don't want to use application source - (imric) - (22) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:04:34 PM EDT
                     Here is my grounds for poo-pooing your concern. - (folkert) - (6) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:10:58 PM EDT
                         No. Wrong. And this is why - (imric) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:25:40 PM EDT
                             Exactly the kind of response I expected. - (folkert) - (4) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:35:15 PM EDT
                                 Horsecrap. - (imric) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:00:19 PM EDT
                                     The binaries have not been distributed . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:52:35 PM EDT
                                         And then GPL4. - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:53:45 PM EDT
                                         Or most OSS used for web services won't be GPL3 -NT - (tonytib) - Aug. 9, 2005, 11:09:09 AM EDT
                     Another train of thought, I need to mention. - (folkert) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:23:20 PM EDT
                         question, using go-global - (boxley) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:35:34 PM EDT
                             I knowest not. -NT - (folkert) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:36:27 PM EDT
                         Since MS software is licenced per user - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:26:59 PM EDT
                             No... there is only one user. - (folkert) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:33:46 PM EDT
                                 Again, ridiculous. - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:59:23 PM EDT
                     Excuse me. I am a programmer. - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Aug. 8, 2005, 07:55:39 PM EDT
                         there is a place for all kinds - (boxley) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 08:35:29 PM EDT
                             Perl's licensing situation is interesting - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 8, 2005, 08:47:14 PM EDT
                         Not at all, Ben. - (imric) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:44:15 PM EDT
                             Perspective is all - (ChrisR) - (4) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:57:19 PM EDT
                                 Pirates? - (imric) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:11:53 PM EDT
                                     Pirate analogy is a different issue - (ChrisR) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:42:16 PM EDT
                                         I disagree - (broomberg) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:46:16 PM EDT
                                             The original instigation for FSF - (ChrisR) - Aug. 8, 2005, 11:16:18 PM EDT
             How is that a 'loophole' unless - (imric) - (11) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:01:46 PM EDT
                 It's a loophole for the FSF. - (pwhysall) - (6) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:05:12 PM EDT
                     http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=21 - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:07:22 PM EDT
                         Your point? - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:10:54 PM EDT
                             I started this - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:28:30 PM EDT
                     Business Interests - (ChrisR) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:25:20 PM EDT
                         Most businesses... - (pwhysall) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:28:35 PM EDT
                         Same difference, if the apps are GPLed. -NT - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:29:02 PM EDT
                 It's contrary to the spirit of the GPL - (JayMehaffey) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:45:32 PM EDT
                     Except, of course - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:16:36 PM EDT
                         Not anti-Buisness - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:47:55 PM EDT
                             *shrug* same as BSD - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:50:32 PM EDT
         Sorry Skip, you are lacking some significant clues - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 07:41:42 PM EDT
             Ruining business? - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:06:32 PM EDT
                 And you're still missing the point - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2005, 02:42:27 AM EDT
                     And that's what I did - I slept on it. - (imric) - Aug. 9, 2005, 07:08:34 AM EDT
         I was going to say something smart-ass here, - (broomberg) - (14) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:11:07 PM EDT
             No. You are not listening. Just like the rest. - (imric) - (13) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:58:06 PM EDT
                 Re: No. You are not listening. Just like the rest. - (bepatient) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:11:23 PM EDT
                 Religion? - (broomberg) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:32:07 PM EDT
                     Listen carefully, now. - (imric) - (4) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:47:31 PM EDT
                         A collective yawn - (ChrisR) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 11:37:29 PM EDT
                             Long term = 0 - (bepatient) - Aug. 9, 2005, 01:01:56 AM EDT
                             I don't think he's talking about selling mods . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2005, 01:15:34 AM EDT
                                 Correct - reselling not the point. - (imric) - Aug. 9, 2005, 07:00:45 AM EDT
                 I think I understand where you're coming from. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:49:19 PM EDT
                     Yeah. I think the 'coming fork' is a bad thing, though -NT - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 11:09:48 PM EDT
                 I think this is where you are going wrong - (JayMehaffey) - Aug. 8, 2005, 11:10:42 PM EDT
                 I am not missing this point. - (folkert) - (2) - Aug. 9, 2005, 05:53:10 PM EDT
                     I see what you're saying - (imric) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2005, 06:13:59 PM EDT
                         BTW, this discussion should really be moved to (new thread) - (imric) - Aug. 9, 2005, 06:15:33 PM EDT
         Several things - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2005, 07:32:38 AM EDT
             More good points (new thread) - (imric) - Aug. 9, 2005, 08:47:45 AM EDT

I don't need to do a bunch of coke to be happy.
132 ms