IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Not very inconclusive
The British couldn't be bothered taking any US territory since the War of Independence had proved that the US was ungovernable. Besides it was a small deal to them, at least compared to what was going on in France at the time.

But on a military level it was a very sound defeat. The US couldn't make headway in 2 years against much smaller numbers. And once British troops were free to really response, the only thing that the US had which resembled a victory happened after they sued for peace.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New At the begining of the war . . .
. . it was presumed American land forces would easily handle the British but the British navy would rule the seas. In actuality American land forces couldn't get their act together and some of the leaders were out-and-out cowards, but the American navy caused a great deal of damage, especially the super frigates, a class of ship the British had never had to deal with before.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New Part of the reason for that...
the parts of the USA that were nearest to Canada were also the least sympathetic to starting a war with Britain. Therefore local militia that warhawks were counting on did nothing, and official armed forces got much less support than they might have desired. Geographic issues like this mattered far less at sea.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New British captains complained a lot . . .
. . about the super frigates because if they lost to one it went on their record as a loss to a frigate which they considered quite unfair (the American frigates were way larger and had two gun decks while British and French frigates had only one).
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
     waste-more-land dead - (rcareaga) - (9)
         Washington burned to the ground wasn't a loss - (ben_tilly) - (7)
             Did you mean to say, 'wouldn't be a loss' ? [just checking] -NT - (Ashton)
             Re: Washington burned to the ground wasn't a loss - (andread) - (5)
                 win some, lose some - (rcareaga)
                 Not very inconclusive - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                     At the begining of the war . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                         Part of the reason for that... - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                             British captains complained a lot . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
         http://www.vietnam-war.info/casualties/ - (Ashton)

Then again you wonder how certain people sign their names to anything and still choose to leave the house.
145 ms