Seems it only notes that they DO; doesn't say HAVE TO.

Post #21,138 by CRConrad 12/12/01 7:36:18 AM Reply	Seems it only notes that they DO; doesn't say HAVE TO. And, "wear an abaya 'in order to avoid harassment' by the mutawa. Even so, 'harassment still occurs,' the memo says"?!? So you are saying she should be forced, _by her own superiors_, to go out of her way and humiliate herself -- in order to avoid APPARENTLY _NON_-SANCTIONED "harassment" from an out-of-control organ of the very state she's there to help defend? Wouldn't it make more sense for those superiors to say, "She's a US soldier here to defend you country. Since you seem to have 'issues' with clothing, we'll order all our soldiers (male as well as female) to wear uniform -- an outfit that clearly states this is a member of your greatest ally's military, here defending YOU on YOUR request -- at all times, on duty as well as off."? And then add, under their breath, "So reign in your fuckwit 'mutawa', or bear the consequences: if they DARE to harass a member of your greatest ally's military, here defending YOU on YOUR request, then they'll be treated just like any other rag-head in the world that pisses us off." The fact that they're NOT already saying exactly that (which has nothing at all to do with Saudian oil, oh no, nooo...) is why America is seen as such a gigantic hypocrite by the world. If only you guys could get your act together and act a little more consistently, I'm sure at least a lot more Europeans would respect you a little more -- and, heck, for all I know, so would probably quite a few rag-heads, too! Christian R. Conrad The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything
Post #21,143 by bepatient 12/12/01 9:32:10 AM Reply	So you are all in favor... ...of our continued lack of respect for other cultures. Thats cool. I'm not. I've seen "ugly American" syndrome. I'm not a big fan. When were you indoctrinated into different cultures? When was a 2nd language demanded of you? We used to be able to afford ignorance...because so many of us stayed within our borders. Now its a penalty...and a very big problem. And this kind of crap just makes that issue more pronounced. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #21,147 by Silverlock 12/12/01 10:01:00 AM Reply	Nice two step Elegantly side stepping the point there Beep. Instead of addressing the issue that only the military female employees are ordered to wear a sack, you bring up the ugly american argument. Slick. Hard to defend against when it isn't the point that was being discussed originally. The State Department itself has guidelines for dress that are less restrictive than the military orders. -quote Dress. Although Westerners have some leeway in dress and social contacts within company residential compounds, both men and women should dress conservatively in public. Women's clothing should be loose fitting and concealing, with high necks, skirts worn well below the knee, and sleeves below the elbow. It is recommended that women not wear pants. -endquote [link\|http://usembassy.state.gov/posts/sa1/wwwhcn29.html\|[link\|http://usembassy.state.gov/posts/sa1/wwwhcn29.html\|http://usembassy.st...wwhcn29.html]] From what I remember of dress uniforms, they should fit the bill. Of course, work uniforms don't make it, the "no pants" guideline rules that out. The thing is, I agree with a lot of what you say, but the way you belittled and ridiculed the pilot trying to change what she sees as unfair treatment does you no credit. When I visit the aquarium, the same thought keeps running through my mind; Leemmmooonnn, Buuttteerrr, MMMmmmmmm good!
Post #21,152 by bepatient 12/12/01 10:19:35 AM Reply	Upthread [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=20954\|My previous post] where even the State Department recommends wearing the "sack" in the Riyadh area...where the military compound just happens to be located. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #21,156 by Silverlock 12/12/01 10:46:24 AM Reply	Yeah. And? I read it. Recommend vs. order. You still did the logic two step in the post I was responding to. When I visit the aquarium, the same thought keeps running through my mind; Leemmmooonnn, Buuttteerrr, MMMmmmmmm good!
Post #21,153 by CRConrad 12/12/01 10:21:23 AM Reply	You're making Marlowe's mistake: Conflating... ...Multiculturalism/Cultural Diversity with Moral Relativism; only, you're making it in reverse, compared to him. Where he needlessly blasts "Multiculturalism" because he abhors Moral Relativism, you are allowing Moral Relativism out of a needless zeal to promote Cultural Diversity. If only you -- both of you -- could see that they aren't the same thing, maybe you'd realize it's possible (and just and good and righteous too, BTW) to defend the one and at the same time condemn the other. (And no, I don't mean defend Moral Relativism and condemn Cultural Diversity! :-) HTH! Oh yes, almost forgot: At age five, as I'd think you very well know. Why -- what does it have to do with anything? Christian R. Conrad The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything

Welcome to IWETHEY!