IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Perhaps you should read what's written . . .
. . before responding with a simplistic absurdity.

My statement was clear enough that Christians, if they wish to protest the Fundies, feel they cannot do so in a Christian format, but must hide behind a "Liberal" label, which intense anti-liberal propaganda is making it more difficult for Christians to do.

Perhaps you would like to explain now how my statements imply that nobody posting those stickers and signs is a Christian?

[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New How about your statements... and conclusion.
Christians that don't behave as fundies do lack conviction? How is THAT inconsistent with my post?

'Hide behind a liberal label'? Where do you get THAT? Are you now implying that there is some kind of conflict between Christian and Liberal? I see none. Unless you are a neocon fundie; a minority group among those that call themselves Christian.

And if I misinterpreted "I have yet to see a single Christian bumper sticker proclaiming against the OT "Christians" who are hijacking your religion right out from under you. Not a single one. Ever." after "Daily I engage in conversations with people very vocal about their opposition to our "Rapturing Out" administration." (included with the paragraph re: bumper stickers), well, I think that my interpretation was fair, even if it was incorrect.

[link|http://www.runningworks.com|
]
Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 


New There is no fundamental conflict . . . .
. . between Christianity and Liberalism - however, the "Religious Right" has re-defined "Christian" and "Liberal" as diametrically opposed and found this a very effective mobilizer of less thoughtful voters. It has served well enough to seize an extrordinary control of the U.S. government.

This definition is far more vulnerable questioned from a Christian context than from a Liberal context from which questioning only helps build a confrontational atmosphere. Confrontation gives rabble rousers the upper hand, so as long as Christians fail to approach the problem from a Christian context the Fundies will have their way and their way of defining "Christian".
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
     THEM - In their own words. - (tuberculosis) - (52)
         first picture - (boxley) - (1)
             ask those who invite her to speak - (tuberculosis)
         And through such as these the Devil doth define . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
             Amen. -NT - (mmoffitt)
         Yabut, look at the bwight side: - (Ashton)
         Hypocrisy or double-think? - (warmachine) - (2)
             Not doublethink, just non-think! - (jb4)
             Look up, 'Promisekeepers' re Biblebelt shibboleths.. -NT - (Ashton)
         most revealing - (rcareaga) - (43)
             what is most interesting(edited to reflect Ashton's umbrage) - (boxley) - (1)
                 Please.. spare a premeditated castration of the idea 'fact' -NT - (Ashton)
             alarming to be sure - (tuberculosis) - (40)
                 Ain't gonna work - (warmachine)
                 take a priest out for dinner (not McDonalds no distractions) - (boxley) - (1)
                     Not interested in real ones - want to unmask pretenders - (tuberculosis)
                 Any of them. - (imric) - (36)
                     Umm - if 'perception is Everything' (?) - (Ashton) - (35)
                         I wouldn't normally support Aston on this.... - (Simon_Jester)
                         Horsecrap. - (imric) - (33)
                             Don't hang yourself quite yet - (broomberg) - (13)
                                 Logical flaw - (warmachine) - (4)
                                     Not so - (broomberg) - (3)
                                         Only applies to just over 20% of the US - (warmachine) - (2)
                                             Nit: 64% of voting age population voted in 2004. 8kB .img - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                 In that case, 1 absentee per Bush voter. Just beat the UK. -NT - (warmachine)
                                 Then there are those of us who embrace absurdity - (ChrisR) - (7)
                                     +10 for clarity -NT - (boxley)
                                     Who said that? - (broomberg) - (5)
                                         Self-interest overrides all - (ChrisR) - (4)
                                             BTW. I believe in Santa Claus!!! - (ChrisR)
                                             I think it's more complex than self-interest. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                 A good evaluation. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                                     Damn good for brief. One complementary facet - - (Ashton)
                             not quite the same, is it? - (rcareaga) - (5)
                                 Doesn't matter, does it. - (imric) - (1)
                                     RE: Bigmouths - (tuberculosis)
                                 oooh, challenges :-) - (boxley) - (2)
                                     move to strike as non-responsive - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                         liberals do not define the term, rightwingers do - (boxley)
                             I see every day . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (9)
                                 And so real life - (bepatient) - (1)
                                     I wouldn't know . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                 ROFL I'm sure... - (imric) - (5)
                                     Perhaps you should read what's written . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                                         How about your statements... and conclusion. - (imric) - (1)
                                             There is no fundamental conflict . . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                     hmm, wonder if these bumber stickers would sell - (boxley) - (1)
                                         "God is a Liberal" -NT - (admin)
                                 I've seen at least one - (ben_tilly)
                             Who are you calling hypocrites? - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                 Nope - you're good when it comes to scope/categories. - (imric) - (1)
                                     Just checking, thanks -NT - (ben_tilly)

No clue.
72 ms