IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I agree
Windows is popular and look what a cesspool that is.

I have a couple concerns right off the bat.

Registers - PPC has a boatload of registers. x86 as I understand it (not particularly well) doesn't seem to have enough and pays for it.

Endianism - I don't want to deal with swapping bytes around going in and out of sockets. I've got a boatload of old code that assumes that the machine and the wire match and I have no interest in fucking around with byteswapping.

Altivec - there's an awful lot of audio code that relies on this stuff. What will be the equivalent? How long will we have to fondle ourselves waiting for efficient ports of pro-apps (audio, video, etc)?




"Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect"   --Mark Twain

"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them."   --Albert Einstein

"This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses."   --George W. Bush
Collapse Edited by tuberculosis Aug. 21, 2007, 06:06:22 AM EDT
I agree
Windows is popular and look what a cesspool that is.

I have a couple concerns right off the bat.

Registers - PPC has a boatload of registers. x86 as I understand it (not particularly well) doesn't seem to have enough and pays for it.

Endianism - I don't want to deal with swapping bytes around going in and out of sockets. I've got a boatload of old code that assumes that the machine and the wire match and I have no interest in fucking around with byteswapping.

Altivec - there's an awful lot of audio code that relies on this stuff. What will be the equivalent? How long will we have to fondle ourselves waiting for efficient ports of pro-apps (audio, video, etc)?




"Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect"   --Mark Twain

"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them."   --Albert Einstein

"This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses."   --George W. Bush
     Intel Apples? - (andread) - (29)
         doubtful - (SpiceWare) - (1)
             I agree - (folkert)
         Cnet says announcement expected Monday 6/6/2005. - (Another Scott) - (20)
             Re: "write Intel software". - (a6l6e6x) - (13)
                 Good and bad - (admin)
                 Apple aren't a software company, though. - (pwhysall) - (6)
                     Yeah, we wouldn't want it to become popular or something. -NT - (folkert) - (5)
                         Selling desktop OSes for PCs is not a business model... - (pwhysall) - (3)
                             Then... umm - (folkert) - (2)
                                 Antitrust, I expect. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                 Where else would MS get ideas for new features? - (tuberculosis)
                         I agree - (tuberculosis)
                 True, but let me elaborate. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                     Apple running Intel on their new tablet computer - (Meerkat)
                     Andrew Orlowski on the Osborne Effect. - (Another Scott)
                     The Osborne Effect didn't kill Osborne Computer. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         Reading that reminds me of IMSAI. - (static)
             NY Times has the story now, with more details. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                 Why do they write for it now? - (altmann) - (4)
                     Various reasons. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                         Galaxy not the same thing - (altmann) - (2)
                             One more thing - (altmann) - (1)
                                 Thanks. - (Another Scott)
         Intel PowerPC CPUs? - (altmann) - (3)
             Entirely more feasible than the alternatives. imho -NT - (pwhysall)
             makes more sense than Mac on x86 - (cforde) - (1)
                 There is a good reason. - (folkert)
         Interesting theory on why Apple is switching - (bluke)
         It's true. They're switching to x86 (new thread) - (altmann)

Goo goo goo joob!
134 ms