Arghh!!!!!!!!

Post #2,074 by Brandioch 7/17/01 2:04:48 PM Reply	Arghh!!!!!!!! I'm not even going to tell you how many times I've run into this distinction. Why couldn't MS name Outlook or Outlook Express something SUBSTANTIALLY different? Each product has a different feature set. You're Exchange problem isn't an Exchange problem if it's an Outlook problem. Your Outlook problem isn't an Outlook problem if it is an Exchange problem. And some weird ISP's actually run Exchange and require Outlook (Blackberry). Arghh!!!!!! It's hard enough trying to get someone to tell me whether they're running Win95/98/ME/NT/2000. Just my rant for the day.
Post #2,079 by brettj 7/17/01 2:30:37 PM Reply	Re: Arghh!!!!!!!! "Why couldn't MS name Outlook or Outlook Express something SUBSTANTIALLY different?" Because they wanted to confuse people! (and I know you already know that.) Your rant gives you away.
Post #2,083 by Andrew Grygus 7/17/01 3:03:55 PM Reply	Weird ISPs running Exchange. I've got one outfit trying to get me to convince clients to use their Exchange hosting service. Their reasoning is that since exchange is too difficult for the clients to administer, they'll run it instead and the clients can access their Exchange server using Outlook over the Internet. Last call he accidently let slip the cost. Starts at over $900/month. [link\|www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]

Welcome to IWETHEY!