2400x600

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #207,095 by Steven A S 5/12/05 11:12:32 AM Reply	2400x600 looks pretty damn good, and no streaking like you can get from inkjets (just leave the magnifying glass at home.) But I haven't seen any glossy paper marked specifically for laserjets, most if not all have been marked for inkjets. ~~~)-Steven---- "I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country..." General George S. Patton
Post #207,100 by pwhysall 5/12/05 11:55:22 AM Reply	Re: 2400x600 [link\|http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06c/A10-12771-215517-322563-322563-81855-81857-81858.html\|http://h10010.www1.h...-81857-81858.html] First link I picked up from a google search for "glossy laser paper" Peter [link\|http://www.ubuntulinux.org\|Ubuntu Linux] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #207,135 by folkert 5/12/05 2:52:59 PM Reply	Seriously here... Get Astrobrite 95 Glossy paper preferably 48# (glossy is much more dense and therefore heavier) That is an ultra white paper. The main thing is the heat resistance. If you get "printing press" rated glossy stock, it is heat resistant. There fore should work just fine for a laser. Now using Printing Press glossy stock, the inkjet ink pools into runs and bubbles. Looks horrendous. Inkjet Photo paper absorbs the ink, and has little imperfections in it. When the water based inks touch... those imperfections float-together like a ClearCoat on a car. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [image\|http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg\|\|\|\|]

Colour printer recommendation, please. - (static) - (25) - May 4, 2005, 09:59:29 PM EDT

My Epson Stylus R200 is pretty good - (drewk) - May 4, 2005, 10:11:38 PM EDT

I went with an Epson RX600 Photo Stylus - (folkert) - (1) - May 4, 2005, 10:44:04 PM EDT

Okay, that's good. - (static) - May 5, 2005, 01:51:36 AM EDT

Canon, no specific model. - (pwhysall) - (10) - May 5, 2005, 01:56:42 AM EDT

Epson Photo Stylus RXseries has 6 cartridges. - (folkert) - (8) - May 5, 2005, 09:56:30 AM EDT

No such thing as "reasonable" in inkjet-land - (pwhysall) - (3) - May 5, 2005, 10:35:30 AM EDT

If you want to print... - (folkert) - (2) - May 5, 2005, 03:12:48 PM EDT

Actually.... - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 5, 2005, 04:50:14 PM EDT

I see, same could be said ... - (folkert) - May 5, 2005, 06:35:48 PM EDT

Canon is easier to refill, but check DPReview, Photo-i - (tonytib) - (3) - May 5, 2005, 12:34:00 PM EDT

I have no problem with the "3rd Party" new tanks - (folkert) - (1) - May 5, 2005, 03:05:57 PM EDT

Seconded ... replacement cartridges in my Epson worked fine -NT - (drewk) - May 5, 2005, 03:07:23 PM EDT

Epson has had problems with non-Epson ink. - (static) - May 5, 2005, 09:22:18 PM EDT

This is true. - (static) - May 5, 2005, 09:28:18 PM EDT

My wife's Cannon i9100 is nice, but, ... - (mmoffitt) - May 5, 2005, 10:34:55 AM EDT

On Color laser printers - (Steven A S) - (9) - May 10, 2005, 02:04:19 PM EDT

Regular Glossy Stock. - (folkert) - (7) - May 10, 2005, 02:05:15 PM EDT

Have you used it yourself? - (Steven A S) - (6) - May 11, 2005, 10:16:31 AM EDT

I have used it... - (folkert) - May 11, 2005, 11:33:41 PM EDT

Some works, some doesn't. - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - May 12, 2005, 10:17:32 AM EDT

There's a difference between.. - (bepatient) - (3) - May 12, 2005, 10:26:27 AM EDT

2400x600 - (Steven A S) - (2) - May 12, 2005, 11:12:32 AM EDT

Re: 2400x600 - (pwhysall) - May 12, 2005, 11:55:22 AM EDT

Seriously here... - (folkert) - May 12, 2005, 02:52:59 PM EDT

We bought an Epson RX630. - (static) - May 10, 2005, 08:35:58 PM EDT

Laugh self to death.
92 ms