They're also quite clear that if you do something the RFC says you SHOULD NOT do, then you might well run into nasty problems, and that the SHOULD NOT is used with the best of intentions to prevent this happening to you.
Google Web Accelerator is a Bad Thing
- (ben_tilly)
- (13)
- May 6, 2005, 05:19:57 PM EDT
Thanks, good to know.
- (admin)
- May 6, 2005, 05:41:48 PM EDT
Nice to see someone understands HTTP
- (ubernostrum)
- (10)
- May 6, 2005, 07:08:19 PM EDT
Maybe, but it will mess up our user metrics
- (tuberculosis)
- (1)
- May 6, 2005, 08:21:54 PM EDT
I doubt this will be a problem for long.
- (ubernostrum)
- May 6, 2005, 08:57:12 PM EDT
I beg to disagree
- (ben_tilly)
- (7)
- May 6, 2005, 10:41:54 PM EDT
It's a SHOULD NOT
- (ubernostrum)
- (6)
- May 7, 2005, 12:23:34 AM EDT
Coming from them it would be hypocrisy
- (ben_tilly)
- (5)
- May 7, 2005, 12:32:44 AM EDT
Two things:
- (ubernostrum)
- (4)
- May 7, 2005, 06:05:14 AM EDT
Colour me unconvinced
- (ben_tilly)
- (3)
- May 7, 2005, 09:58:29 AM EDT
Just to be clear
- (ubernostrum)
- (2)
- May 7, 2005, 12:44:33 PM EDT
RFCs are clear on SHOULD vs. MUST
- (dws)
- (1)
- May 7, 2005, 05:18:27 PM EDT
Yes they are.
- (ubernostrum)
- May 8, 2005, 01:21:35 PM EDT
Shouldn't be a problem from our apps...
- (ChrisR)
- May 7, 2005, 02:56:22 AM EDT