IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / News Picks Forum / (giggles) Nice change. But back to topic,
Post #20,608
by wharris2
12/7/01 2:24:29 AM
12/7/01 3:37:13 AM
Reply
New (giggles) Nice change. But back to topic,
But anyway, OFF-BASE. No one is making her do this ditty on the base, are they? She needs to obey the laws and customs of the country she's stationed in, dammit, and in the process she needs to damn well pull her head out of her ass.

Now if we want to wax the Saudi government and install a "proper" women-appreciative and women's rights government in Saudi Arabia, that's one thing. But last I heard we weren't quite thinking about that.
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it."
-- Donald Knuth
Collapse Edited by wharris2 Dec. 7, 2001, 03:37:13 AM EST
Spelling police! Spelling police!
But anyway, OFF-BASE. No one is making her do this ditty on the base, are they? She needs to obey the laws and customs of the country she's stationed in, dammit, and in the process she needs to damn well pull her head out of her ass. Now if we want to wax the Saudi government and install a "proper" women-appreciative and women's rights government in Saudi Arabia, that's one thing. But last I heard we weren't quite thinking about that.
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth
Collapse All History
Post #20,625
by nking
Picture of nking
12/7/01 8:19:21 AM
Reply
New When in Rome, do as the Romans do.
If it saves them from being killed or hurt, might as well do it. If not, request a transfer to a different base.
     Does anyone else think... - (bepatient) - (57) - Dec. 7, 2001, 02:50:38 AM EST
         (giggles) Nice change. But back to topic, - (wharris2) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2001, 03:37:13 AM EST
             When in Rome, do as the Romans do. - (nking) - Dec. 7, 2001, 08:19:21 AM EST
         Takes just one test case.. - (Ashton) - (39) - Dec. 7, 2001, 04:04:25 AM EST
             The problem is... - (jb4) - Dec. 7, 2001, 08:49:51 AM EST
             And just how... - (bepatient) - (37) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:37:30 AM EST
                 Dunno if I can put it in teerms simple enough for Econ. - (Ashton) - (36) - Dec. 7, 2001, 06:04:46 PM EST
                     Weird - (bepatient) - Dec. 7, 2001, 07:24:27 PM EST
                     Sure...fine...whatever. - (bepatient) - (34) - Dec. 7, 2001, 07:23:41 PM EST
                         Of course she is. - (Ashton) - (27) - Dec. 7, 2001, 09:28:32 PM EST
                             Presumption - (imric) - (26) - Dec. 7, 2001, 09:45:47 PM EST
                                 comfort? utter BS. - (Ashton) - (25) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:34:05 PM EST
                                     Get this. - (imric) - (24) - Dec. 8, 2001, 12:48:42 AM EST
                                         These are quite 'special' circumstances. - (Ashton) - (23) - Dec. 8, 2001, 06:21:30 AM EST
                                             Insolent? - (imric) - (20) - Dec. 8, 2001, 08:46:48 AM EST
                                                 Ah how EZ it would all be if.. logic alone were enough! - (Ashton) - (14) - Dec. 8, 2001, 07:37:23 PM EST
                                                     Logic alone? - (imric) - (13) - Dec. 10, 2001, 10:26:18 AM EST
                                                         Piffle - (Silverlock) - (12) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:42:49 AM EST
                                                             *chortle* -NT - (imric) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:50:54 AM EST
                                                             Not quite. - (bepatient) - (10) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:58:19 AM EST
                                                                 anti-piffle - (Silverlock) - (9) - Dec. 10, 2001, 12:50:21 PM EST
                                                                     Reinstate it - BeeP (of all people) corroborated it! - (CRConrad) - (8) - Dec. 10, 2001, 05:03:20 PM EST
                                                                         Yup. - (imric) - Dec. 10, 2001, 06:01:58 PM EST
                                                                         not really... - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 10, 2001, 08:59:03 PM EST
                                                                             Seems it only notes that they DO; doesn't say HAVE TO. - (CRConrad) - (5) - Dec. 12, 2001, 07:36:18 AM EST
                                                                                 So you are all in favor... - (bepatient) - (4) - Dec. 12, 2001, 09:32:10 AM EST
                                                                                     Nice two step - (Silverlock) - (2) - Dec. 12, 2001, 10:01:00 AM EST
                                                                                         Upthread - (bepatient) - (1) - Dec. 12, 2001, 10:19:35 AM EST
                                                                                             Yeah. And? - (Silverlock) - Dec. 12, 2001, 10:46:24 AM EST
                                                                                     You're making Marlowe's mistake: Conflating... - (CRConrad) - Dec. 12, 2001, 10:21:23 AM EST
                                                 Hey Maggie! - (Ashton) - (4) - Dec. 8, 2001, 07:41:16 PM EST
                                                     Hey Ash! - (slugbug) - (3) - Dec. 8, 2001, 10:29:20 PM EST
                                                         Thanks. - (Ashton) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2001, 12:57:38 AM EST
                                                             not 100% - (slugbug) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2001, 01:08:21 AM EST
                                                                 Well, then, start a new topic. - (Andrew Grygus) - Dec. 9, 2001, 05:12:30 PM EST
                                             Even easier solution. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Dec. 8, 2001, 08:47:54 PM EST
                                                 "The play's the thing wherein we'll catch the conscience of - (Ashton) - Dec. 9, 2001, 12:40:47 AM EST
                         Third option: - (mhuber) - (3) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:02:59 PM EST
                             That would be the Decent, the Honorable, the American thing - (Ashton) - (2) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:45:11 PM EST
                                 And I suspect - (mhuber) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2001, 02:20:38 PM EST
                                     Thanks, Mike.__ Al punte, as usual. - (Ashton) - Dec. 9, 2001, 03:15:45 PM EST
                         Two thoughts comes to mind.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 8, 2001, 11:00:44 AM EST
                             Third: What (?) do we 'Stand For' _...if anything at all (?) -NT - (Ashton) - Dec. 8, 2001, 07:44:05 PM EST
         [OT]Ad on the page... - (inthane-chan) - Dec. 7, 2001, 11:07:55 AM EST
         Fine point - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Dec. 7, 2001, 12:29:26 PM EST
             In that case - (nking) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2001, 04:22:27 PM EST
                 Yes You Can, Norm - (Ashton) - Dec. 7, 2001, 06:14:15 PM EST
         having met some AF wimmen it may give a renewal of the term - (boxley) - (6) - Dec. 7, 2001, 08:20:02 PM EST
             Maybe glamour + toughness aren't a common mix; and for sure, - (Ashton) - (5) - Dec. 7, 2001, 09:48:43 PM EST
                 Re: Maybe glamour + toughness aren't a common mix; and for s - (wharris2) - (4) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:32:30 PM EST
                     No need for 'Duck' if that were his meaning (?) - (Ashton) - (3) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:50:11 PM EST
                         As the Huron said to his soup, e tu Brule? - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2001, 10:40:44 PM EST
                             Yeah well, I figure in any *real* misogynist situation, - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:21:30 PM EST
                                 define "underdog" :) -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 11, 2001, 09:40:47 PM EST
         Take from the Soapbox - (bepatient) - (3) - Dec. 10, 2001, 12:02:40 PM EST
             More info - (bepatient) - Dec. 10, 2001, 12:07:29 PM EST
             It becomes more apparent that, the State Dept. presumes its - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:51:05 PM EST
                 No...actually... - (bepatient) - Dec. 11, 2001, 10:13:13 AM EST

Same thing we do every night, Pinky... try to take over the WORLD!
166 ms