IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I have no problem with faith based charity
that is open and provides services with no strings attached.

I'm not a big fan of the Hare Krishnas but the HK temple in Detroit (with some help from Henry Ford Jr) feeds an awful lot of people without telling them that their souls are in mortal danger all the time.

Its the ones that set up the big buffet and require you to be baptised before being given a plate that I object to. Hard vs Soft sell I suppose. But if you're going to put those kinds of conditions on things, then don't expect to work with the government.

Evangelicals are their own worst enemy here. They could change their approach and end the objections. But they're apparently too filled with "holy spirit" or something to develop actual compassion and respect for alternative beliefs.

If your thing is so good, do good works and people will seek to be like you. Stay a preachy fear mongering asshole and you will be shunned and impeded.

What a fucking surprise.



"Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect"   --Mark Twain

"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them."   --Albert Einstein

"This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses."   --George W. Bush
New I do....
not with faith-based charities...

but I do have a problem with Tax Dollars going to faith-based charities.

Look the government can cut a check - or not. I don't see any reason for Tax Dollars going to faith-based charities. If the government wants to help out some bloke, fine, run a program and help some bloke. Do NOT take my Tax Dollars and give it to someone who claims they are going to help some bloke.

(I'm not biased in this, btw. I don't believe in the US Government giving Tax Dollars to the American Red Cross or the United Way either.)
New so you are against privitization of government?
salvation army gets a lot more bang for the buck than the state welfare office.
thanx,
bill
All tribal myths are true, for a given value of "true" Terry Pratchett
[link|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/]

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 48 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Maybe so..
but the Sally Anne is not accountable to the public. The government is (well... it's supposed to be.) If they are using tax dollars, there should be some accountability.
New thats what audits are for.
All tribal myths are true, for a given value of "true" Terry Pratchett
[link|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/]

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 48 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New I thought they were to get rid of thetans.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New So does the United Way and Red Cross....
yet I still don't see any reason for my TAX DOLLARS to go to them.

Besides, you and I both know that charities and privization are two different things. (The key elements being those Audits and Measurements that you just mentioned below.)
     Pat Robertson:Democratic judges greater threat than Al Qaeda - (tuberculosis) - (42)
         Democratic judicial appointments? - (warmachine) - (38)
             I'm sure that Republican judges who are not . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (37)
                 I assume there's no need to 'Run!'? - (warmachine) - (2)
                     he's running for president :-) -NT - (boxley)
                     He tried - (JayMehaffey)
                 And it is the underlying sentiment.. - (bepatient) - (33)
                     The terrible part - (JayMehaffey) - (23)
                         How do you know? - (bepatient) - (21)
                             I have no problem with faith based charity - (tuberculosis) - (6)
                                 I do.... - (Simon_Jester) - (5)
                                     so you are against privitization of government? - (boxley) - (4)
                                         Maybe so.. - (hnick) - (2)
                                             thats what audits are for. -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                 I thought they were to get rid of thetans. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                         So does the United Way and Red Cross.... - (Simon_Jester)
                             Not most, all - (JayMehaffey) - (13)
                                 Same for tsunami relief. - (Andrew Grygus) - (12)
                                     Oooh. Threats. - (imric) - (11)
                                         Skip, you're an exception - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                                             Are you sure? - (imric) - (9)
                                                 Look at your link more closely - (ben_tilly) - (7)
                                                     Extremes - (imric) - (6)
                                                         What portion of the country is devout? - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                                                             I'll accept that. - (imric)
                                                             If you assume the polls had a representative sample... -NT - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                                                 Polling is fairly accurate - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                                                     Is it "religious" or "church going christian"? - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                                                                         IIRC, both of those flipped - (ben_tilly)
                                                 agreed the repo in my house isnt an ardent church goer - (boxley)
                         What he said. - (jb4)
                     OK, so there are some moderate Christians . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                         Re: "crosses instead of swastikas" - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                             Not actually, despite the German name. - (Andrew Grygus)
                     Tolerance is supposed to be a 2 way street - (hnick) - (1)
                         Re: Tolerance is supposed to be a 2 way street - (bepatient)
                     Uhh, Bill? Put a cork in it. - (jb4) - (3)
                         Uh, no. - (bepatient) - (2)
                             Didn't you see "Independence Day"? - (jb4) - (1)
                                 Oh yeah... - (bepatient)
         s/biggest threat to America/most representative of Americans - (mmoffitt)
         Robertson's in a class by himself. - (Another Scott)
         Since he's wrong... - (andread)

Back in my day, if we needed directions we had to slaughter a goat and wiggle the intestines!
186 ms