... which is why I'm still torn.
I finally bought a new laptop. AMD 64 bit, verra nice. I'm currently running Xandros on it, and it runs acceptably, but it's 32-bit... it currently has no 64-bit-AMD-compiled version.
So I'm looking at Ubuntu (well, Kubuntu, since I'm a lot more comfortable with KDE)... but how logical is it to expect people maintaining those software repositories to compile and keep updated all the releases of the software I'm using which are still beta and in development? (Specifically thinking of Inkscape here, but also nvu).
If I could get past the horrors of a Gentoo install, it wouldn't be an issue -- based on what I *think* I understand (and I may be misunderstanding the process). Portage automates the compilation of source code, so I could take the source of a nightly build of inkscape, run it through portage and *poof*, a 64 bit application... without having to rely on someone else creating a binary package for me.
That is an awfully attractive scenario, assuming it's true. Of course, I don't know that it's attractive *enough* :) -- right now I have a perfectly functional laptop running a 32-bit linux, and I'm not motivated enough to jump through hoops just to say I'm running a 64-bit OS. I seriously doubt that *I* would notice any appreciable difference. I might, but what do I do with it? Draw comics, write, tinker with HTML. That's it.
But, you know, I'm constantly messing with things that work just fine and that I know I should leave alone, just because I'm curious. Why? Because I am a fool, sir. A simple, simple fool...