IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Congress studies tax penalizing high fuel efficiency
[link|http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/04/20/MNGA4CBJH81.DTL|http://www.sfgate.co...0/MNGA4CBJH81.DTL]

The federal tax man has an eye on those increasingly popular high- mileage vehicles, gas misers whose drivers love going further between fill-ups and saving on sky-high gas prices.

The idea is simple but technologically daunting -- base gas taxes on miles driven instead of on gallons of fuel bought. And advocates say the reason for such a change is also simple -- although such fuel-efficient vehicles as hot-selling hybrids pay less in gas taxes, they're still out on the nation's roads contributing to congestion and wear and tear on an aging infrastructure.
------
This is so fucked up I am simply without words.



"Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect"   --Mark Twain

"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them."   --Albert Einstein

"This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses."   --George W. Bush
New develop a chip to roll back odometer on new cars
All tribal myths are true, for a given value of "true" Terry Pratchett
[link|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/]

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 48 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Time to build an empty lot on Oregon State University...
New Not a new concept.
It's been around for years, but has a severe logical flaw. Fuel efficient vehicles are generally smaller and lighter, causing less wear on the infrastructure and less traffic conjestion than larger heavier vehicles.

I'm sure this theory is promoted by and somehow financed by the auto industry, who's large heavy fuel guzzling SUVs are obscenely profitable because people stupid enough to buy an SUV are stupid enough to overpay for it. The Ford SUV factory is the most profitable manufacturing facility in the western world according to many reports.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New An old statistic.
Probably from the time cars weighed about 2 tons.

A loaded semi (18 wheeler) causes 7000 times the road wear of a single car. It's obvioulsy not a simple linear function of weight.
Alex

The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell
New It's close to exponential
You should see what damage an overloaded logging truck causes...

Most of it is due to the visco-elastic nature of asphalt. Deform it enough and it comes to a point where it tears instead of rebounding when the load is removed. That kind of deformation is permanent. A car doesn't have the mass to cause that much displacement.
New Which is why per axle fees are stupid also
A lot of places charge trucks based on a fee per axle. Which makes truckers want to overload their trucks to keep their costs down. A ground pressure fee would be a lot better but it's a lot harder to figure then counting axles.

Jay
New Could be a good idea
This could be a good idea if the rate per mile is accuratly adjusted for the amount of wear and tear done by the cars.

What will probably happen is that the rate will be set at some high mininum rate plus a small adjustment based on vehicle size so that people with small cars will be subsidizing the wear and tear of those with big ones.

Jay
     Congress studies tax penalizing high fuel efficiency - (tuberculosis) - (7)
         develop a chip to roll back odometer on new cars -NT - (boxley)
         Time to build an empty lot on Oregon State University... -NT - (hnick)
         Not a new concept. - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
             An old statistic. - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                 It's close to exponential - (scoenye) - (1)
                     Which is why per axle fees are stupid also - (JayMehaffey)
         Could be a good idea - (JayMehaffey)

Any more than we can resent a dog licking its own testicles.
55 ms