Ridiculous...laughable... (sorry...me speelt it wrong)

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #20,411 by bepatient 12/5/01 8:26:18 PM 12/5/01 10:15:54 PM Reply	Ridiculous...laughable... (sorry...me speelt it wrong) ...and incomparable. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient] Edited by bepatient Dec. 5, 2001, 10:15:54 PM EST Rediculous...laughable... ...and incomparable. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} BePatient Collapse All History
Post #20,428 by Another Scott 12/5/01 10:02:16 PM 12/5/01 11:20:12 PM Reply	Many thanks. A shiny gold star with crossed oak clusters for you! :-) Cheers, Scott. Edited by Another Scott Dec. 5, 2001, 11:20:12 PM EST Expand All History
Post #20,466 by Simon_Jester 12/6/01 9:55:28 AM Reply	It's incomparable? It's imcomparable to relate the Enron failure with the WhiteWater failure?
Post #20,471 by bepatient 12/6/01 10:31:22 AM Reply	To implicate direct involvement You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #20,473 by Simon_Jester 12/6/01 11:03:09 AM Reply	Didn't Cheney have those energy policy meetings... and wasn't he a major stockholder of Enron? And wasn't there a refusal to investigate California pricing at the time? In fact, wasn't there a refusal to even admit who attended the meetings? And this isn't direct involvement?
Post #20,477 by bepatient 12/6/01 11:23:37 AM Reply	And.. ...wasn't he forced to divest all interests well prior to all of those events? And isn't it nonsensical to ignore the largest player in the energy business when formulating an enery policy? And when has owning stock in a company implicated the stockholder in its management...unless that stock was part of an ownership plan of the management...which was not the case with Cheney. I owned stock in @Home...I sold it before the collapse...am I guilty for their poor management and crappy contracting policies? Y'all are reaching. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #20,480 by Silverlock 12/6/01 11:51:49 AM Reply	And you are burying your head in the sand. Stop reflexivly defending them, open your eyes and see. There may be no collusion, but there may also be plenty. I don't see a lot of evidence either way (except for the fact that they are politicians and thus should be presumed guilty until proven innocent). When I visit the aquarium, the same thought keeps running through my mind; Leemmmooonnn, Buuttteerrr, MMMmmmmmm good!
Post #20,495 by bepatient 12/6/01 2:17:34 PM Reply	What...keep playing the... ...bullshit game thats been going on for the past 10 years? No fscking thank you. If there's no evidence...don't write articles like there is or should be...and don't waste my time trying to act like there is. Either charge somebody...or go away with this crap. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

Incest and Corruption, Texas Style - (altmann) - (37) - Dec. 5, 2001, 04:57:47 PM EST

Don't worry...we'll bail them out. - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 5, 2001, 05:19:33 PM EST

Left out a couple of words, didn't you? - (jb4) - Dec. 6, 2001, 08:42:46 AM EST

Another Enron post... - (bepatient) - (17) - Dec. 6, 2001, 02:38:28 PM EST

What it would take - (Ashton) - (8) - Dec. 5, 2001, 06:07:09 PM EST

Ridiculous...laughable... (sorry...me speelt it wrong) - (bepatient) - (7) - Dec. 5, 2001, 10:15:54 PM EST

Many thanks. - (Another Scott) - Dec. 5, 2001, 11:20:12 PM EST

It's incomparable? - (Simon_Jester) - (5) - Dec. 6, 2001, 09:55:28 AM EST

To implicate direct involvement -NT - (bepatient) - (4) - Dec. 6, 2001, 10:31:22 AM EST

Didn't Cheney have those energy policy meetings... - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - Dec. 6, 2001, 11:03:09 AM EST

And.. - (bepatient) - (2) - Dec. 6, 2001, 11:23:37 AM EST

And you are burying your head in the sand. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2001, 11:51:49 AM EST

What...keep playing the... - (bepatient) - Dec. 6, 2001, 02:17:34 PM EST

Is that what you meant? - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2001, 02:35:22 PM EST

Nope... - (bepatient) - Dec. 6, 2001, 02:37:10 PM EST

the ties from enron board members working at - (boxley) - (5) - Dec. 6, 2001, 06:52:05 PM EST

Damn... - (bepatient) - (4) - Dec. 6, 2001, 06:54:37 PM EST

do you know how much omar was paid to NOT hand - (boxley) - (3) - Dec. 6, 2001, 07:00:35 PM EST

Wow Box...these are good ones... - (bepatient) - (2) - Dec. 6, 2001, 07:06:06 PM EST

2 arkansas state troopers swear to it all :) zing! -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2001, 07:12:52 PM EST

Rim shot ;-) -NT - (bepatient) - Dec. 6, 2001, 07:46:33 PM EST

Eh? - (wharris2) - (8) - Dec. 5, 2001, 10:44:15 PM EST

Eh? Eh? - (jb4) - (2) - Dec. 6, 2001, 08:45:58 AM EST

Oh yeah... - (bepatient) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2001, 10:34:23 AM EST

So... - (jb4) - Dec. 6, 2001, 02:21:47 PM EST

Actually, check Enron's records... - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Dec. 6, 2001, 11:09:01 AM EST

If so, it's more than insider trading... - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - Dec. 6, 2001, 12:20:33 PM EST

Selling the stock... - (bepatient) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2001, 02:24:32 PM EST

Hope that audit firm takes a big hit - (wharris2) - Dec. 6, 2001, 07:52:06 PM EST

Auditors - (Decco Dave) - Dec. 6, 2001, 07:08:34 PM EST

Fat fscking chance... - (jb4) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2001, 08:37:24 AM EST

Guilty as charged. -NT - (Ric Locke) - Dec. 6, 2001, 09:45:08 PM EST

Blaming Clinton and Gore for Enron - (marlowe) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2001, 09:38:07 AM EST

::bitter chuckle:: - (Ric Locke) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2001, 08:06:10 PM EST

It's people like you - (Ashton) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2001, 04:29:40 AM EST

::sheepish:: - (Ric Locke) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:14:21 PM EST

With you on enough of that.. - (Ashton) - Dec. 11, 2001, 02:03:46 AM EST

Arther Anderson weasels out... - (Simon_Jester) - Dec. 13, 2001, 07:10:31 AM EST

iwethey.org

I know members of the legislature who would disagree with you under oath.
69 ms