I'm guessing, obviously

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #200,447

by ben_tilly

3/25/05 1:22:51 AM

I'm guessing, obviously

But my guess is that Samba makes what Windows think are locks act like what Windows thinks locks should act like. So it doesn't really matter what is actually happening on on the Linux side - just how it looks to Windows.

Cheers,
Ben

I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)

File locking problem - (broomberg) - (22) - March 24, 2005, 06:39:39 PM EST

I would assume that... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 24, 2005, 07:15:13 PM EST

Grrr... - (broomberg) - (2) - March 24, 2005, 07:58:29 PM EST

I'm guessing, obviously - (ben_tilly) - March 25, 2005, 01:22:46 AM EST

I'm guessing, obviously - (ben_tilly) - March 25, 2005, 01:22:51 AM EST

Turn off Opportunistic locking for those files. - (folkert) - (11) - March 24, 2005, 07:55:10 PM EST

I was thinking of the same thing - (broomberg) - March 24, 2005, 08:00:05 PM EST

Done - (broomberg) - (3) - March 24, 2005, 08:07:37 PM EST

You sure I don't want fake oplocks instead? -NT - (broomberg) - (1) - March 24, 2005, 08:08:57 PM EST

NEVER. - (folkert) - March 25, 2005, 11:31:09 AM EST

Not that I am aware of. Of course... - (folkert) - March 25, 2005, 11:33:02 AM EST

And "blocking locks" should be set to off. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - March 24, 2005, 08:42:16 PM EST

Err? - (broomberg) - (4) - March 24, 2005, 09:06:07 PM EST

I've seen it produce time-outs. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - March 24, 2005, 09:08:21 PM EST

I've seen it produce time-outs. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - March 24, 2005, 09:08:33 PM EST

In that case: Done -NT - (broomberg) - March 24, 2005, 09:12:33 PM EST

And double posts, too! ;-) -NT - (Yendor) - March 24, 2005, 10:44:22 PM EST

If the various suggestions don't help - (jbrabeck) - (4) - March 24, 2005, 08:23:29 PM EST

I hate timing dependant problems! - (broomberg) - (1) - March 24, 2005, 09:02:48 PM EST

First time I saw it was in COBOL class - (jbrabeck) - March 24, 2005, 10:08:29 PM EST

Done. And I added another move - (broomberg) - (1) - March 24, 2005, 09:10:31 PM EST

Lemme know if it worked. -NT - (jbrabeck) - March 24, 2005, 10:04:37 PM EST

Happens when you delete a file and it's opened elsewhere - (ChrisR) - March 25, 2005, 02:56:48 PM EST

iwethey.org

How much more correcter could this phrase get? None more correcter.
46 ms