IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Err?
\n       blocking locks (S)\n              This  parameter  controls  the  behavior of smbd(8) when given a\n              request by a client to obtain a byte range lock on a  region  of\n              an  open  file, and the request has a time limit associated with\n              it.\n\n              If this parameter is set and the lock range requested cannot  be\n              immediately  satisfied,  samba  will  internally  queue the lock\n              request, and periodically attempt to obtain the lock  until  the\n              timeout period expires.\n\n              If this parameter is set to no, then samba will behave as previ-\n              ous versions of Samba would and will fail the lock request imme-\n              diately if the lock range cannot be obtained.\n\n              Default: blocking locks = yes\n


Why? Seems like it is less likely to trigger a failure if set on, allowing a grace period between lock request and final failure.
New I've seen it produce time-outs.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New I've seen it produce time-outs.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New In that case: Done
New And double posts, too! ;-)
-YendorMike

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
     File locking problem - (broomberg) - (22)
         I would assume that... - (ben_tilly) - (3)
             Grrr... - (broomberg) - (2)
                 I'm guessing, obviously - (ben_tilly)
                 I'm guessing, obviously - (ben_tilly)
         Turn off Opportunistic locking for those files. - (folkert) - (11)
             I was thinking of the same thing - (broomberg)
             Done - (broomberg) - (3)
                 You sure I don't want fake oplocks instead? -NT - (broomberg) - (1)
                     NEVER. - (folkert)
                 Not that I am aware of. Of course... - (folkert)
             And "blocking locks" should be set to off. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
                 Err? - (broomberg) - (4)
                     I've seen it produce time-outs. -NT - (Andrew Grygus)
                     I've seen it produce time-outs. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                         In that case: Done -NT - (broomberg)
                         And double posts, too! ;-) -NT - (Yendor)
         If the various suggestions don't help - (jbrabeck) - (4)
             I hate timing dependant problems! - (broomberg) - (1)
                 First time I saw it was in COBOL class - (jbrabeck)
             Done. And I added another move - (broomberg) - (1)
                 Lemme know if it worked. -NT - (jbrabeck)
         Happens when you delete a file and it's opened elsewhere - (ChrisR)

Where did you want to go yesterday?
97 ms