Dr. Who, set the standards for time travel

Post #19,966 by orion 12/2/01 1:41:21 PM Reply	Dr. Who, set the standards for time travel It wasn't always the Time Lords who mucked with time, there was the Jaggeroth or whatever that got split into several pieces and the destruction of his ship had energized the primal ooze that life sprang from on Earth. Then there was Adric, who died on a ship that killed the dinosaurs and made mammals the domminate lifeforms on planet Earth. Then there was The Master and that timelady who was turning people into trees but I forget her name. They were evil timelords and would manipulate time to their advantage. Don't forget the White and Black Guardians of time from the "Time Key" segments. What is up with that? Plus somehow Timelords can meet earlier versions of themselves, but suffer from amnesia of the meeting after the meeting is done? Or how about the "Back to the future" movies? You can change time, but it could backfire on you and make things worse or make things better. Not to mention you could meet yourself from a previous time or a future time. There could be more than one of you. *Picking up the pieces of my broken life.*
Post #20,115 by Ashton 12/3/01 4:20:08 PM Reply	All that and more.. Time travel as chimera. The idea of time travel, irresistible to all grades of imagination - surely is about forcing us to recognize: that we are constitutionally unable to grok the concept of the present moment, and are constantly generating imaginations about 'the future' - based upon that thing we call memory = a most selectively 'recalled' version of a small slice of the past. Thus, most of us are never in fact experiencing er.. now at all; just the next look-back at what just occurred (!) and the omnipresent imagining-ahead. Presumably those (few) who purport to have mastered the (experiencing of the 'present moment'?) - via somehow ignoring the mind chatter in both directions - demonstrate that we Can become freed from the tyranny of imagination, and to some purpose: one might even call it timelessness. Why not? (But we suppose that that is not nearly as much fun as.. all the imagination stuff? Hah!) Ashton Time is nature's way of (giving us the illusion that) everything isn't happening at once! Actually...
Post #20,120 by orion 12/3/01 4:27:01 PM Reply	Time Travel To God, being an eternal and supreme being and existing out of time, time has no meaning for him. God can see all timelines and knows the outcome of each event, yet lets the chips fall as they may. God does roll dice, and those dice are called free-will. Time is a hard thing to grasp, it can be unchanging yet changing, it can be set yet flexiable, it can be contradictary at times. When we try to change it we can either make things happen as we think they did, or change things so they happen differently, or error and make things happen just the way they did before. But one thing is true, we are all living within time on this mortal plane, and cannot be removed from it, at least not yet. Is my future already set, or am I just now starting to take steps to change it into something else? Only someone outside of the timeline can see what will happen to me. :) *I am free now, to choose my own destiny.*
Post #20,451 by static 12/6/01 5:47:39 AM Reply	God and Time. One of my favourite analogies about God and Time to imagine Time being like a pencil line drawn down a sheet of paper. God is like the paper. :-) Also, I remember a Dilbert (!) sequence about the meaning of Time. It was a discussion between Ratbert and the garbage man. It was something about time being a filter over reality. It actually almost made sense. Ratbert, of course, sprained his brain... Wade. "All around me are nothing but fakes Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"
Post #20,539 by Ashton 12/6/01 6:49:35 PM Reply	Paper.. and also 'projection screens / filters' are often used similarly - as a means of grokking the significance of the maya, world of appearances in which we, they and zIWE dwell (along with roses, lemurs, nukes and sunsets). (Of course too.. no one ever achieves a grokking to Fullness 'here'! - at least, it is presumed that any few who Do: have Nothing to say about It ;-) For the rest of us, it's just like Mornington \ufffdrescent poetry contests. No? Ashton who shares with the species: not knowing shit. either. ('least I know That)
Post #20,537 by Ashton 12/6/01 6:41:34 PM Reply	There is no limit to what people may impute to 'God'. Your "speaking for Her"; your imagining that you "can guess that some time-concept might mean something also to Her" [!!] is the prime evidence of that near-universal homo-sap defect. It is ALL in your head (as you are oblivious to whatever is not in your head). That limns Your 'Universe' but has nothing at all to do with The Mystery. Nada, zippo, cipher. Pure Imag-ination of that which cannot be 'imaged'. Sorry Norm, but every didactic utterance beginning with, God thinks/wants/ __ blah blah merits the above Universal Certificate of Error. Collect a thousand of those and -- Ashton Error-Listings R'Us Ltd.
Post #20,723 by static 12/7/01 8:23:44 PM Reply	Reality parse error. I would think that refusing to ascribe any view or opinion to a potential omnipotent being would rather prevent them communicating to us. But what do I know? You won't believe in my idea of God. :-) Wade, who does know this is not the right forum for that argument. "All around me are nothing but fakes Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"
Post #20,770 by Ashton 12/8/01 6:02:40 AM Reply	Interesting idea. (One's access to er Reality?) (Great second line here, but you'd have to have seen Laugh-In, for it to work.. ;-) Don't think logic will be of much help here. Some would say: the 'communications are all around us'. (So would I.) Seems to be a matter of perspective. It's the idea of Language, of written words = 'in our words', as if from a similar critter and a similar er mammalian nervous system: that is where the worldwide trouble began. A current embodiment is 'the personal God' <2-way> 'conversation with this entity'. I can see the appeal. But it has consequences for all. People kill people over other people's interpretations of alleged Words direct from God. People invent 'favored tribes' meant to inherit 'promised real estate'! (Lots of junk-DNA in all those Words from on-high, when we get through with imagining.) Rest case on basis: this model hasn't worked, just creates Wars. Like today's. (Particularly annoying when someone avers, "The Entity 'says' thus". Y'know?) Words have some astonishing usefulness; poetry can capture what prose can't. They don't however, tell us anything about the Mystery - except what we want to hear. What reads't thou, Hamlet? words.. words.. Cheers, A. Caution: objects in mirror may be farther away than shown Now as to your sig.. ;-)
Post #20,771 by Ashton 12/8/01 6:07:20 AM Reply	LRPD: Thisisyour brain on bad interior design.Any questions?
Post #20,958 by static 12/10/01 10:11:23 PM Reply	'Twas a heads up only. I just didn't think you should dismiss Norm's (and my) opinion of God's Message quite so readily. That's all. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, Ashton. (-: My sig would take too long to explain unless you've seen "The Wings of Honneamise" a few times. Perhaps in another thread...? It is oddly appropriate, however, though perhaps not quite in the way you think. Wade. "All around me are nothing but fakes Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"
Post #20,977 by Ashton 12/11/01 1:27:45 AM Reply	Nahhh. Prime Directive states clearly, Don't spit in the soup Everyone's got to eat (Some just think the okra's slimy, and like to play with it) :-\ufffd Ashton The Medium is the Massage

Welcome to IWETHEY!