There seems to be a lot of room for interpretation in auditing. Should you do something that one auditor asks, and a later auditor decides that you should be doing it a different way, I have to think that public documentation of doubts about the first way of doing it would create a legal liability.
And that's a fairly safe topic. Discussion of ways in which people aren't doing what they are supposed to be doing (or are doing it but slower than you want) would be much worse.
So your choice is either to, like Skip, talk about how well things are going for you, or to speak in vague generalities. Neither is likely to be useful for people who want help.
Cheers,
Ben