Boggled.

And maybe there is... [edit:] [link|http://pirates.vassar.edu/faq.php|A pretty good E@H BOINC FAQ]. [/edit]

I think the benchmarks are per-processor. I think the turnaround time is the total time needed per work unit - from start to awarding of credit. Since a work unit is divided up between 4 computers, if you're speedy but there's an ARM watch out there working on your work unit, then your turnaround time is going to suffer. (There's a maximum response time, so it won't wait forever.)

Compare the CPU time results and I think you'll see that you've got a pretty speedy box. :-)

The upload and download rate seems to vary widely between boxes too. I don't know how that affects things.

Also, when I started using DeepThought on the G5 it stopped the Boinc client. I lost a few work units (they never completed) and the turnaround time went to ~ 3 days. It took a few days to recover. The turnaround time seems to be heavily weighted toward recent results.

It may also be that you're using a pokey Linux client. I don't know if the OS X and Linux clients are substantially different. :-(

That's what I think is going on anyway.

Cheers,
Scott.

I am using a MAC or linux box, and can't see the screensaver. Where is it?

The Einstein@Home Application is ready to display the graphics, however there is still some work left on the boinc client to make it visible. If you're curious and not afraid of a command line, try the method described in [link|http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/forum_thread.php?id=468|this thread], an experimental client or a third party tool

Here's the instructions from the thread. They're hard to read so I colorized them(Turner would be proud)
blue = user input
green = comments
black = system response

telnet localhost 31416 --I entered this
Trying 127.0.0.1... --
Connected to localhost. -- System responded with this (3 lines)
Escape character is '^]'. --
<result_show_graphics> --I entered this.
<success> --System responded. Graphics appeared
^] --control right bracket to get telnet prompt
telnet> quit --enter quit to end telnet session
Connection closed.

Going to have to check this out tonight.

Darrell Spice, Jr. [link|http://spiceware.org/gallery/ArtisticOverpass|Artistic Overpass]\n[link|http://www.spiceware.org/|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore

Post #197,890 by pwhysall 3/10/05 7:41:41 AM Reply	Boggled. We had this discussion earlier, I'm sure. Your dual 2.5 GHz G5: Measured floating point speed\t1109.22 million ops/sec Measured integer speed\t3535.79 million ops/sec My 3 GHz P4: Measured floating point speed\t1535.6 million ops/sec Measured integer speed\t4419.27 million ops/sec I'm showing you dust, right now, right? Only not. Me: Average turnaround time\t2.63 days You: Average turnaround time\t0.66 days /me weeps. Peter [link\|http://www.ubuntulinux.org\|Ubuntu Linux] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #197,898 by admin 3/10/05 8:04:29 AM Reply	Re: Boggled. My AMD 2500 has an average of 1.44 days. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #197,956 by Steven A S 3/10/05 4:18:24 PM Reply	My AMD 3000+ is showing a turn around of 0.64 days. I had Peter till he threw 2 more computers into the mix. ~~~)-Steven---- "I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country..." General George S. Patton
Post #197,899 by Another Scott 3/10/05 8:19:52 AM 3/10/05 9:57:37 PM Reply	There should be a FAQ that explains this stuff. And maybe there is... [edit:] [link\|http://pirates.vassar.edu/faq.php\|A pretty good E@H BOINC FAQ]. [/edit] I think the benchmarks are per-processor. I think the turnaround time is the total time needed per work unit - from start to awarding of credit. Since a work unit is divided up between 4 computers, if you're speedy but there's an ARM watch out there working on your work unit, then your turnaround time is going to suffer. (There's a maximum response time, so it won't wait forever.) Compare the CPU time results and I think you'll see that you've got a pretty speedy box. :-) The upload and download rate seems to vary widely between boxes too. I don't know how that affects things. Also, when I started using DeepThought on the G5 it stopped the Boinc client. I lost a few work units (they never completed) and the turnaround time went to ~ 3 days. It took a few days to recover. The turnaround time seems to be heavily weighted toward recent results. It may also be that you're using a pokey Linux client. I don't know if the OS X and Linux clients are substantially different. :-( That's what I think is going on anyway. Cheers, Scott. Edited by Another Scott March 10, 2005, 09:57:37 PM EST Expand All History
Post #197,983 by pwhysall 3/11/05 12:58:26 AM Reply	As opposed to a LEG watch? titter Peter [link\|http://www.ubuntulinux.org\|Ubuntu Linux] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #197,991 by Another Scott 3/11/05 2:28:10 AM Reply	:-)
Post #197,992 by CRConrad 3/11/05 2:33:15 AM Reply	"Titter"? YM "Groan", I take it... or even "Guh-RRoannn!".
Post #197,994 by pwhysall 3/11/05 2:53:41 AM Reply	No. I said "titter" and I meant "titter". Peter [link\|http://www.ubuntulinux.org\|Ubuntu Linux] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #198,032 by SpiceWare 3/11/05 9:46:46 AM Reply	Graphics already work on the Mac & Linux !?!?! I am using a MAC or linux box, and can't see the screensaver. Where is it? The Einstein@Home Application is ready to display the graphics, however there is still some work left on the boinc client to make it visible. If you're curious and not afraid of a command line, try the method described in [link\|http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/forum_thread.php?id=468\|this thread], an experimental client or a third party tool Here's the instructions from the thread. They're hard to read so I colorized them(Turner would be proud) blue = user input green = comments black = system response telnet localhost 31416 --I entered this Trying 127.0.0.1... -- Connected to localhost. -- System responded with this (3 lines) Escape character is '^]'. -- <result_show_graphics> --I entered this. <success> --System responded. Graphics appeared ^] --control right bracket to get telnet prompt telnet> quit --enter quit to end telnet session Connection closed. Going to have to check this out tonight. Darrell Spice, Jr. [link\|http://spiceware.org/gallery/ArtisticOverpass\|Artistic Overpass]\n[link\|http://www.spiceware.org/\|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore
Post #198,046 by drewk 3/11/05 12:02:14 PM Reply	It works The thread you linked had reference to some other options. Never found those, but play with the mousewheel to zoom, and drag with the mouse to rotate. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #198,060 by folkert 3/11/05 1:31:04 PM Reply	It's all XML based command, shown below. Blancmange -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [link\|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230\|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Military Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link\|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp\|source]
Post #198,062 by folkert 3/11/05 1:33:05 PM Reply	DO NOT CLICK ON ABOVE LINK. SCOTT!!!!!! (new thread) Created as new thread #198061 titled [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=198061\|DO NOT CLICK ON ABOVE LINK. SCOTT!!!!!!] -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [link\|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230\|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Military Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link\|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp\|source]
Post #198,076 by SpiceWare 3/11/05 3:07:12 PM Reply	Pi anyone? telnet localhost 31416 Darrell Spice, Jr. [link\|http://spiceware.org/gallery/ArtisticOverpass\|Artistic Overpass]\n[link\|http://www.spiceware.org/\|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore

Welcome to IWETHEY!