IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Don't trust it
Have way too little experience with the issues involved.
So I'll run the program I found during several installs and see if it make sense.
I'll also see if there are any commercial programs that claim to to the same.
I'm not above paying for a utility that does it, written by someone with years of experience in the area.

Here is the issue:

We have a commercial package running as a spooling server.
We develop programs that use it over the course of a month.
It might take WEEKS to test the various programs that use it when it is upgraded.
But we might be forced to upgrade it for a particular problem, which we don't care about for the other programs using it.
This means I need multiple versions of the software running on that server, or I need multiple servers, one for each version.
I might need a DOZENS of versions active at the same time within a couple of years. If 3 people spend 2 months working on a system that requires a particular version of the software, there is NO WAY that particular application will be modified to fit a new version of the spooler. Multiply that by 1/2 dozen teams of people, adding a couple more teams every few months.
Oh, and each server costs about $12,000, plus about $5K for the software license.
New VmWare?
--


And what are we doing when the two most powerful nations on earth -- America and Israel -- stomp on the elementary rights of human beings?

-- letter to the editor from W. Ostermeier, Liechtenstein

New Too slow
VMWare overhead was about 30% when I tested it.
The spooling process is almost 100% CPU.
Typical spool job goes for 1 to 5 minutes.
I run up to 3 at the same time, and I might have hundreds in the queue.

Right now I am running on a dual opteron, but can put another 2 CPUs if I need to.
I am unwilling to sacrifice the CPU unless I REALLY have to.
     Windows installation monitor - (broomberg) - (30)
         Sledgehammer approach - (drewk) - (3)
             You are insane - (broomberg) - (2)
                 No, just paranoid - (drewk) - (1)
                     Agreed. - (pwhysall)
         Hey, MS claims to have one for free! - (broomberg)
         Try this. - (inthane-chan) - (2)
             Err, this is a packager? - (broomberg) - (1)
                 Yep. - (inthane-chan)
         Advanced Registry Trace - (hnick) - (12)
             That sounds easy to write - (ben_tilly) - (11)
                 Here's the problem. - (pwhysall) - (7)
                     Good enough for this case though? - (ben_tilly) - (6)
                         Don't trust it - (broomberg) - (2)
                             VmWare? -NT - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                                 Too slow - (broomberg)
                         Experiment time! - (pwhysall) - (2)
                             What was running while you did that? - (drewk) - (1)
                                 Not much - (pwhysall)
                 Regedit itself can dump into a text file -NT - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                     I just did that, for curiosity's sake. - (pwhysall)
                 Probably is - (hnick)
         can you peel apart the install? - (boxley) - (1)
             Too hackish - (broomberg)
         Maybe contact the company's tech support? - (Another Scott) - (4)
             bwahahahahahaha - (broomberg) - (3)
                 I thought so. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                     Refer back to here - (broomberg) - (1)
                         Oh. Sorry. They've got you, don't they. :-( -NT - (Another Scott)
         Filemon might help some - (FuManChu) - (1)
             Yup, have it running - (broomberg)

Seriously, for someone who shows some signs of intelligence, the consistency with which you misunderstand anything inconvenient to you is quite amazing.
277 ms