Yes it is
A lovely example is Wal-mart's higher profit margins because they don't provide health care. Who does provide the health care? Oh, the rest of us in higher fees.
MS has been banging the drum here in WA about wanting to expand but they insist that in order to do so they'll need some new highways so their serfs can get to work more quickly. Who will pay for the highways? Us working stiffs. Who benefits? MS execs mostly (they get to keep their fashionable lakeside addresses), then their employees.
The higher incomes actually do consume disproportionate resources and ought to pay for it.
