IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: That really says it all
I call bullshit on everything else you said concerning it getting something right.

Why? It does.
Again and again you state about the horrible pieces, and the reasons you would never go back to dealing with it.

Yes, because things are never all perfect or all crap.
Yet you also state a particular piece simply works, and it is the fault of the people who installed it, the way it was installed, etc.

Yes. And?

Whatever. Show me an alternative to Exchange that has a client that isn't Groupwise. I worked with an Exchange setup for 5 years that worked as advertised. It was a horrible thing to manage, and if it broke it was hell on earth to fix, but when it was up and running, it was working. Properly.
You adminned something for years, you got to know its ins and outs. It was your baby. Of course it worked, you spent blood sweat and tears on it.

Not really; We followed the instructions; when installed properly, it works. *surprise*

And it was hardly my "baby". Remember, for most people, work is just that; work. I wouldn't do Exchange if I wasn't paid for it.

I would never want to do that, or any other sysadmin task again. It's a crappy job with little to no reward, it earns the derision and ire of your colleagues, and there's no end product to show for it. My current role is only about a hundred times more rewarding than that, if only a little more lucrative.
Which means, there was a time in your life that it was worth it to suffer, and as far as you are concerned, anyone who has a mis-behaving calendar simply hasn't suffered enough.

And that's just nonsense, Barry. I connect to an Exchange server every day, at work; dozens of meetings a day are scheduled with it; it doesn't foul up. That doesn't make it perfect, and I've been at pains in this thread to point that out. However, the rotten, stinking, awful, horrible truth is that there is no real alternative in that space to Exchange. Well, there is; it's Groupwise, which is just as horrible but in different ways. Both are lock-in closed-source payware EVUL.
Which in turn tells me you fell into a bit of Stockholm Syndrome with this particular package.

No, it means I don't have the "OMFG MICRO$HAFT SUXXORS" attitude that some people seem to have.

Exchange is a dreadful thing; it uses a variant of the MS-SQL engine to store the mail and as a result ends up (as at 5.5) implementing a subset of AD to do the security, it's horrible to manage (one edits a string registry key to add a disclaimer to outgoing mail. In RTF. Not fun), it's slow, it's fragile, it's non-standards-compliant, it's a resource hog.

All that, and it works, too.

[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Fragile
Ok, the world of applications is not black and white,
there are levels of issues / problems / amounts of crap
that we are willing to put up with.

Don't bother tossing out the "evul payware" red herring,
I don't mind paying for software. I've got recurring
licensing cost for things like Oracle, Syncsort,
various MF<->Linux integration utilities,etc, and I
consider them well worth it.

There is no way that an individual who has experienced
no problems with a individual application can dismiss other
people experiencing problems. Just because your specific
implementation worked does not means others will.


And anyway, my anecdotal evidence > your anecdotal evidence
cuz I spent five and a bit years looking after this crap and
getting to know it rather better than I'd have hoped.

is just as meaningless. You weren't in OUR installations,
seing OUR domain and ADS setup, dealing with OUR networks,
our delegation schemes, our mailbags (what a horrible concept),
our network issues, our (insert the next variable that MS
Exchange seems to trip over), etc, etc, etc.

You have a specific LACK of experience, and then you state that
because YOU didn't experience it, other CAN'T experience it.

That's just plain stupid. Sorry. It is. It certainly isn't

If your point is that Exchange is the best that is out
there, at least for the business realities of the moment,
I won't argue. It probably is, for now. That's life.

But don't discount the pain involved in dealing with it.
There is a tipping point, it may or may not be reached,
we may or may not go to an alternative some day.

But you defending the indefensable, ie: it is fragile,
deal with it, makes you nothing more than an MS apologist.

When you you wave off real problems, saying YOU never saw
them therefor they don't happen, makes you someone to
not to trust, someone with an agenda, someone who lives in
the land of marketing, not reality.

I hope I know you better than that, and that you really don't
think that way, at least not usually.

But maybe I don't, and you do.
New We're talking past each other here.
Box went from "our Exchange setup misbehaves" to "group calendaring in Office sux".

THAT is what I was objecting to.

The anti-MS zealotry is no better than the MS apologia (or the Linux apologia and pro-MS zealotry, come to that; the toast is buttered on both sides).

[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Oy you!
our $shitta stinks and here $childprocShitta is why. Fair statement, and no I have not looked for alternatives as I have no impact on that side of the house.
I love her dearly, far beyond any creature I've ever known, and I can prove it, for never once in almost seventy years of married life have I taken her by the throat. Mind you, it's been a near thing once or twice.
George Macdonald Frasier
Clearwater highschool marching band [link|http://www.chstornadoband.org/|http://www.chstornadoband.org/]
     Why does Windows still SUCK? - (folkert) - (28)
         It's the apps, stupid. - (pwhysall) - (27)
             Who's talking about free? - (admin) - (1)
                 Because it's inadequate. - (pwhysall)
             group calendering sux in office as well - (daemon) - (13)
                 Rubbish, Box. - (pwhysall) - (12)
                     nice try but not the case, $MS themselves cant figger it out -NT - (daemon)
                     Too little info to make a judgement - (broomberg)
                     Not where I work - (bluke) - (9)
                         Shrug - (pwhysall) - (8)
                             I hear a business opportunity calling you. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                 Never, ever again :-) - (pwhysall) - (5)
                                     That really says it all - (broomberg) - (4)
                                         Re: That really says it all - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                             Fragile - (broomberg) - (2)
                                                 We're talking past each other here. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                     Oy you! - (daemon)
                             Peter, that's BS and you should know it - (ben_tilly)
             When was the last time you really saw... - (folkert) - (5)
                 He wasn't talking about the Groupwise *back*-end... -NT - (admin) - (1)
                     Is that your subtle way of saying... - (ben_tilly)
                 A real installation of Groupwise? - (ubernostrum) - (2)
                     What version? - (folkert) - (1)
                         GroupWise Version 6.5.1 - (ubernostrum)
             Drop-in replacements for Exchange Server . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4)
                 Interesting omission. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     Yes, that is. -NT - (folkert)
                 Novell's new entry: Hula - (admin)
                 Here's the key point from that - (drewk)

My name's Friday. I carry a badge.
55 ms