One other other thing to consider

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #194,173 by drewk 2/11/05 12:21:45 PM Reply	One other other thing to consider The kernel is not the OS. [cue holy war] The OS is actually GNU, and if you are running what most people casually call Linux you are running the GNU operating system with a Linux kernel. What [link\|http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html#why\|should] be called "GNU/Linux". If you want to be pedantic, that is. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #194,174 by mmoffitt 2/11/05 12:23:12 PM Reply	Re: What should [*] be called "GNU/Linux". Oh, God. Man the barricades. bcnu, Mikem Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer. God Bless America.
Post #194,198 by folkert 2/11/05 1:45:17 PM Reply	Nobody around here, that I know of... Is Pedantic. There are only those of us that; Condone Implicit Stupidity. :) -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [link\|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230\|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Miltary Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link\|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp\|source]
Post #194,267 by drewk 2/11/05 5:55:03 PM Reply	I know you did that on purpose, but ... That's implicitly condoning stupidity. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #194,348 by folkert 2/12/05 11:08:39 AM Reply	Oh... so you DID bite! Bahahaha. You are SO predictable. Thanks for the laugh. I needed that this morn. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [link\|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230\|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Miltary Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link\|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp\|source]
Post #194,370 by drewk 2/12/05 2:33:21 PM Reply	Predictability is comforting For instance: I predict you will get the bottomless fries at Red Robin, then spend the entire first night and half the next day at Beep's playing console games in the basement. Just remember to come up long enough to announce to the world that there's no way you're going in the pool, then plop yourself down like Bhudda in the shade and make them try. I predict I will nod off in the car/van and you will thinks it's absolutely hysterical to tap the brakes and watch me lurch upright. I predict Scott will load up Zope and at least three people will huddle around reading LRPD cannon for an hour ... until they realize there's a damn party going on outside. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]

newbie kernel question - (tinahdee) - (19) - Feb. 11, 2005, 08:12:16 AM EST

It's always "Linux"... - (pwhysall) - Feb. 11, 2005, 08:16:20 AM EST

Basically what peter said. - (folkert) - (8) - Feb. 11, 2005, 08:31:19 AM EST

Re: Basically what peter said. - (tinahdee) - (7) - Feb. 13, 2005, 07:19:36 PM EST

Is this you? - (broomberg) - (1) - Feb. 13, 2005, 08:04:35 PM EST

Re: Is this you? - (tinahdee) - Feb. 13, 2005, 08:34:56 PM EST

Waitaminnit ... actual research? - (drewk) - Feb. 13, 2005, 08:45:04 PM EST

Well you know where to go for background - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Feb. 14, 2005, 12:06:13 AM EST

Pick a different name - (broomberg) - (2) - Feb. 14, 2005, 09:15:05 AM EST

I didn't guess... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Feb. 14, 2005, 04:53:10 PM EST

I still play the game... - (gdaustin) - Feb. 18, 2005, 10:20:52 PM EST

No exact point - (JayMehaffey) - Feb. 11, 2005, 09:36:55 AM EST

One other thing to consider - (Steven A S) - Feb. 11, 2005, 12:03:00 PM EST

One other other thing to consider - (drewk) - (5) - Feb. 11, 2005, 12:21:45 PM EST

Re: What should [*] be called "GNU/Linux". - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 11, 2005, 12:23:12 PM EST

Nobody around here, that *I* know of... - (folkert) - (3) - Feb. 11, 2005, 01:45:17 PM EST

I know you did that on purpose, but ... - (drewk) - (2) - Feb. 11, 2005, 05:55:03 PM EST

Oh... so you *DID* bite! - (folkert) - (1) - Feb. 12, 2005, 11:08:39 AM EST

Predictability is comforting - (drewk) - Feb. 12, 2005, 02:33:21 PM EST

If you write a kernel without using any linux code at all - (daemon) - Feb. 11, 2005, 10:56:03 PM EST

iwethey.org

Red Rover, Red Rover, Bob Lazar's comin' over.
50 ms