IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Can't make your example work
First thing I noticed is it seems to be short one parenthesis, and has an extra closing brace. I've tried various combinations to fix it and can't get it working.

If I put a closing paren after function (test_element) I get a warning it's expecting a { at that point. Nothing else even looks right.

[link|http://dkime.com/js_iterator.php|Here's] my sample code. If anyone can figure this out several of us here will be very grateful.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New I think you're missing the 'anonymous' part.
\n1  function test_this() {\n2      for_each(document.js_test_form.elements,\n3               function (test_element) { alert (test_element.name); }\n4               )\n5  }


Notice how line 3 is both a complete function definition, and an argument being passed to the test_this function, inline.


The Sig:
"Despite the seemingly endless necessity for doing
so, it's actually not possible to reverse-engineer intended invariants
from staring at thousands of lines of code (not in C, and not in
Python code either)."

Tim Peters on python-dev
New Got it, example works now, woot
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
     Interesting iterating in JavaScript trick - (ben_tilly) - (19)
         Ooooo. I like... -NT - (FuManChu)
         Very elegant. -NT - (static) - (17)
             I must be missing something - (drewk) - (16)
                 Very likely. - (static) - (4)
                     Define "streams or generators" - (drewk) - (3)
                         They are names of concepts, at least one analog you know - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                             Giggle - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                 Yes. And you're hoping that the promises are kept. :-) -NT - (ben_tilly)
                 There are several benefits - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                     Much better - (drewk) - (5)
                         Anonymous functions and closures - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                             Looks like it's treating 'i' as a reference - (drewk) - (3)
                                 I said "invocation of the function" for a reason - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                     You're right about not getting it without using it - (drewk) - (1)
                                         I'm sure that you AREN'T using closures - (ben_tilly)
                     Can't make your example work - (drewk) - (2)
                         I think you're missing the 'anonymous' part. - (FuManChu) - (1)
                             Got it, example works now, woot -NT - (drewk)
                     I like this one better - (tuberculosis)

Got LRPD?
273 ms