There you go again

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #192,891 by lincoln 2/3/05 2:12:30 PM Reply	There you go again since you refuse to see the distinction between intent and the act, and refuse to admit it, you're refusing to leave your wish-fulfillment fantasy viewpoint. My analogy stands even if you're not intelligent enough, or have the balls, to accept it. lincoln "Windows XP has so many holes in its security that any reasonable user will conclude it was designed by the same German officer who created the prison compound in "Hogan's Heroes." - Andy Ihnatko, Chicago Sun-Times [link\|mailto:bconnors@ev1.net\|contact me]
Post #192,899 by pwhysall 2/3/05 2:45:32 PM Reply	The distinction between the intent and the act... ...is the difference between manslaughter and murder. The one tends to incur a sentence of five or so years; the other tends to incur a life sentence. But then, you're a fucking idiot, so you wouldn't be able to make that distinction. Peter [link\|http://www.ubuntulinux.org\|Ubuntu Linux] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #193,253 by lincoln 2/6/05 3:49:25 PM Reply	And you're an arrogant limesucker [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=191498\|I made that distinction perfectly clear here] which you so willfully ignore. BTW - Here it is, almost one week later, and I'm still waiting for you to come up with a better analogy, since you didn't like mine. lincoln "Windows XP has so many holes in its security that any reasonable user will conclude it was designed by the same German officer who created the prison compound in "Hogan's Heroes." - Andy Ihnatko, Chicago Sun-Times [link\|mailto:bconnors@ev1.net\|contact me]
Post #193,256 by pwhysall 2/6/05 3:54:02 PM Reply	Didn't we establish that you're an idiot? Yes, I think we did. See, your act cannot be committed without the intent. Sorry, but if you download something you know to be copyrighted without the consent of the copyright holder, then you intend to violate that copyright. It's intrinsic to the act. Your crappy analogy has no such intrinsic intent component. You may now fuck off. Peter [link\|http://www.ubuntulinux.org\|Ubuntu Linux] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!

SBC fucks me in the ass - (lincoln) - (87) - Jan. 15, 2005, 11:28:44 PM EST

If you can get them, go with Speakeasy. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Jan. 16, 2005, 12:30:49 AM EST

Oh, and make sure SBC uses lube next time, too. -NT - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 16, 2005, 12:31:17 AM EST

I sympathise and not all at once. - (pwhysall) - (82) - Jan. 16, 2005, 03:48:20 AM EST

Not necessarily. - (imric) - (2) - Jan. 16, 2005, 08:48:53 AM EST

Re: Not necessarily. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 16, 2005, 09:59:21 AM EST

*smile* - (imric) - Jan. 16, 2005, 10:33:13 AM EST

Re: "Usenet is so 1996" - (lincoln) - (78) - Jan. 18, 2005, 09:17:52 AM EST

Actually you DO want to violate copyright - (ben_tilly) - (77) - Jan. 21, 2005, 12:36:13 PM EST

I prefer "try before you buy" - (lincoln) - (12) - Jan. 21, 2005, 10:55:44 PM EST

This shouldn't be complex - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 21, 2005, 11:42:44 PM EST

Ah say, ah say, that was a JOKE, son! - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2005, 03:06:15 AM EST

As I said before - (lincoln) - Jan. 24, 2005, 02:40:14 PM EST

bootleg records, 70's/friend 1-5 for selling them -NT - (daemon) - (8) - Jan. 22, 2005, 10:06:30 AM EST

What - if anything - does that mean? -NT - (CRConrad) - (7) - Jan. 23, 2005, 05:01:07 PM EST

I think I know. - (Another Scott) - (6) - Jan. 23, 2005, 05:11:18 PM EST

Pretty good match with my Boxish to English translation. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 23, 2005, 10:42:50 PM EST

"Friend of mine got 1-5 yrs for selling bootlegs in the 70s" - (CRConrad) - (4) - Jan. 24, 2005, 03:43:26 AM EST

Kind of like reverse polish notation - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 24, 2005, 06:53:01 AM EST

Dunno about "stacked"... - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 24, 2005, 07:01:17 AM EST

:-) -NT - (daemon) - Jan. 24, 2005, 07:38:13 AM EST

Ya shouldn't a went and said that... - (jb4) - Jan. 25, 2005, 01:53:48 PM EST

www.allmusic.com - (pwhysall) - (63) - Jan. 22, 2005, 03:08:25 AM EST

Maybe a list of your favorites would help too. - (Another Scott) - (62) - Jan. 22, 2005, 09:51:04 AM EST

At least YOU understand - (lincoln) - (61) - Jan. 24, 2005, 02:38:11 PM EST

We all UNDERSTAND; you just don't want to ADMIT Ben is right -NT - (CRConrad) - (60) - Jan. 24, 2005, 05:01:08 PM EST

YOU UNDERSTAND NOTHING - (lincoln) - (59) - Jan. 25, 2005, 09:49:22 AM EST

Well, the analogy is a bit over the top... - (ChrisR) - Jan. 25, 2005, 09:57:11 AM EST

Right? No, wrong, as usual. ('Cause you're not only cheap... - (CRConrad) - Jan. 25, 2005, 10:29:57 AM EST

Full points for creativity - (ben_tilly) - (24) - Jan. 25, 2005, 10:39:15 AM EST

A query on the premise. - (static) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2005, 08:54:09 PM EST

Not bloody likely. Willing to bet 95%+ copyright violations. -NT - (n3jja) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2005, 09:57:09 PM EST

Not everything there violates copyright - (lincoln) - (3) - Jan. 30, 2005, 10:11:59 PM EST

Did I say everything? Learn to fucking read. - (n3jja) - (2) - Jan. 30, 2005, 11:00:26 PM EST

I never said they NEED alt.binaries - (lincoln) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2005, 01:54:31 PM EST

You really do need a Glass Navel, don't you? - (n3jja) - Feb. 3, 2005, 09:50:39 PM EST

You "suppose" a lot - (lincoln) - (3) - Jan. 30, 2005, 10:07:19 PM EST

Silly question for you - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Jan. 30, 2005, 11:49:06 PM EST

Are you for fucking real??? - (lincoln) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2005, 02:06:06 PM EST

More so than you, apparently. -NT - (n3jja) - Feb. 3, 2005, 09:54:01 PM EST

tell me Ben_Tilly - (lincoln) - (13) - Jan. 30, 2005, 10:21:37 PM EST

I find myself in a difficult position - (broomberg) - (7) - Jan. 30, 2005, 10:36:02 PM EST

I'm arguning "A" and they're arguing "B" - (lincoln) - Jan. 30, 2005, 10:57:16 PM EST

Hey, this is Flame Quarantine. - (Another Scott) - Jan. 30, 2005, 11:13:42 PM EST

You'll note that this is not a court - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Jan. 31, 2005, 12:11:26 AM EST

And he already knows the answer to that. - (n3jja) - (3) - Jan. 31, 2005, 12:33:48 AM EST

Neither will Ben_Tilly - (lincoln) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2005, 02:08:31 PM EST

I'm thinking of three words.... Pot... Kettle.....Black.... -NT - (n3jja) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2005, 09:54:54 PM EST

meself, Two vessels and a color; Pot, Kettle, Day-Glo Orange -NT - (folkert) - Feb. 3, 2005, 10:10:09 PM EST

Of course I have - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Jan. 31, 2005, 12:07:06 AM EST

There you go again - (lincoln) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2005, 02:12:30 PM EST

The distinction between the intent and the act... - (pwhysall) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2005, 02:45:32 PM EST

And you're an arrogant limesucker - (lincoln) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2005, 03:49:25 PM EST

Didn't we establish that you're an idiot? - (pwhysall) - Feb. 6, 2005, 03:54:02 PM EST

Worst. Analogy. Ever. -NT - (pwhysall) - (31) - Jan. 25, 2005, 11:50:08 AM EST

I thought car analogies took that prize. -NT - (Another Scott) - (29) - Jan. 25, 2005, 11:52:06 AM EST

They did. Linc just took that shark and jumped it with this. -NT - (pwhysall) - (28) - Jan. 25, 2005, 11:58:25 AM EST

Oh, ok. Congrats Lincoln! >:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 25, 2005, 12:27:02 PM EST

Go use BitTorrent you encephalous lout! -NT - (lincoln) - (26) - Jan. 30, 2005, 10:09:20 PM EST

I do :-) - (pwhysall) - (25) - Jan. 31, 2005, 12:32:53 AM EST

Nice URL name - (lincoln) - (24) - Feb. 3, 2005, 02:13:45 PM EST

Read the site, shithead. - (pwhysall) - (23) - Feb. 3, 2005, 02:43:43 PM EST

So according to you - (lincoln) - (22) - Feb. 6, 2005, 03:57:03 PM EST

Deja vu! - (pwhysall) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2005, 04:03:44 PM EST

READ ME IN MY POSTS! -NT - (folkert) - Feb. 6, 2005, 05:37:23 PM EST

Yawn. - (Another Scott) - (19) - Feb. 6, 2005, 04:26:11 PM EST

I'm sorry... - (admin) - (18) - Feb. 6, 2005, 05:01:18 PM EST

Yeah. I know. - (Another Scott) - (17) - Feb. 6, 2005, 05:21:25 PM EST

go Ouaga yourself :-) -NT - (daemon) - Feb. 6, 2005, 05:40:34 PM EST

They are? - (ben_tilly) - (15) - Feb. 6, 2005, 07:40:57 PM EST

Deja vu? #192151. I don't think the coal fire was intended.. -NT - (Another Scott) - (14) - Feb. 6, 2005, 07:57:26 PM EST

The worst fires aren't intended... -NT - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Feb. 6, 2005, 08:00:52 PM EST

Yes, but if the arsonists return to the scene over and over - (Another Scott) - (12) - Feb. 6, 2005, 09:57:49 PM EST

But who is Bill Murray? (And what lesson?) -NT - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Feb. 7, 2005, 12:56:58 AM EST

Eh? 27kB - (Another Scott) - (9) - Feb. 7, 2005, 07:38:40 AM EST

I meant in this flame war -NT - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Feb. 7, 2005, 11:36:48 AM EST

The flaming participants. -NT - (Another Scott) - (7) - Feb. 7, 2005, 11:38:13 AM EST

Which *one* of us? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Feb. 7, 2005, 11:40:05 AM EST

Could fit several, perhaps. Why do you ask? -NT - (Another Scott) - (5) - Feb. 7, 2005, 11:41:08 AM EST

Very simply... - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Feb. 7, 2005, 11:48:58 AM EST

Dunno. I'm a little dense sometimes. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2005, 11:53:00 AM EST

You might be pretty (?)___decidedly not demure___:-\ufffd -NT - (Ashton) - Feb. 8, 2005, 01:41:08 AM EST

If we're choosing sides in Groundhog Day ... - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 7, 2005, 11:56:53 AM EST

No. marlowe can be Ned though. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 7, 2005, 01:38:17 PM EST

well either side isnt bored with it yet :-) -NT - (daemon) - Feb. 7, 2005, 09:20:40 PM EST

Then create one yourself - (lincoln) - Jan. 30, 2005, 10:58:33 PM EST

get customer service on the line - (daemon) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2005, 10:56:20 PM EST

Good advice! -NT - (imric) - Jan. 18, 2005, 06:45:37 AM EST

iwethey.org

G'day, mate, throw another Mozart on the harpsichord!
87 ms