The real test of the new government may be a test for George Bush, also. A large majority -- 80 percent, it says [link|http://politicalwire.com/archives/2005/01/29/polls_show_iraqis_want_us_troops_out.html|here] -- of Iraqis want American troops to go away. But Bush is saying the [link|http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=2X4DD5UX4EQN2CRBAEZSFEY?type=topNews&storyID=7474213|troops must stay], and he refuses even to suggest a timetable for withdrawal.
So what happens if the newly elected government of Iraq orders the troops out of their country?
Not that I expect that will happen. Seems that many of the people who showed up at the polls had no clue what they were voting for (a bit like the US I guess). At least according to [link|http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/31/opinion/31herbert.html?oref=login&hp|this].
Much of the electorate was voting blind. Half or more of those who went to the polls believed they were voting for a president. They weren't. They were electing a transitional national assembly that will have as its primary task the drafting of a constitution. The Washington Post noted that because of the extreme violence that preceded the election "almost none of the 7,700 candidates for the National Assembly campaigned publicly or even announced their names."
As John F. Burns put it in The Times yesterday:
"Half a dozen candidates have been assassinated. As a result, the names of all others have not been made public; they were available in the last days of the campaign on Web sites inaccessible to most Iraqis, few of whom own computers."