IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Of course they do.
Let's go back to my original [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=192253|comment]:

I agree, the tie-in isn't very strong except from my perception of the similar societal attitudes (e.g. strong women, or women having power over men, is unheard of in Islam). The woman in Nepal was punished by her society because she didn't live up to an inflexible, male-imposed, ideal of what a woman's role is, just as in Islamic countries women are often regarded as unclean temptresses by other inflexible, male-imposed ideals.

The brush was a little broad, but only a little IMO. There are exceptions, and I know of no society in the world where women and men are fully equal in political, economic and social power. But some muslim nations are especially egregious, e.g. [link|http://news.amnesty.org/index/ENGMDE230152004|Amnesty International]'s report on Saudi Arabia:

Saudi Arabia is gearing up for the country's first nationwide municipal elections early next year, but half of the population will not be taking part. Women have been excluded. This is contrary to the country's election law, which does not explicitly ban women from taking part.

The exclusion also undermines recent positive developments in the country, such as the much publicised "National Dialogue", which included a focus on women's rights and their ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The ratification in October 2000 was done without reservation about Article 7 on political participation.

[...]

Saudi Arabia's electoral law is clear about women's participation. The law uses the word "citizen" -- in Arabic, this refers to both men and women in indicating those eligible to vote. Despite this, Interior Minister Prince Nayef bin Abdel Aziz announced last month that women would not be allowed to take part in the elections, saying "I don't think that women's participation is possible."

The Head of the Election Committee, Prince Mut'ab bin Abdul Aziz, said, "I expect women to participate in elections in future stages, after conducting studies to assess whether it is useful or not." Amnesty International opposes Saudi Arabia's plans to ban women from participation in the forthcoming elections and believes that the right to universal suffrage is a fundamental right that must not be delayed.

[...]

In Saudi Arabia, not only are women being blocked from participating in politics, they are not permitted to move freely without the company of an immediate male relative (Mahram), even to seek urgent medical attention.

A simple activity like walking down the street is prohibited for women who are not allowed to walk in public without the company of a Mahram. Breaching these codes gives rise to suspicion of prostitution and may result in arrest, brutality, and torture by police, particularly the religious police (Mutawa'een), who patrol the streets monitoring, among other things, women's conduct or dress or behaviour.

Further gender-based restrictions on the freedom of movement include the prohibition on women driving cars. Fourteen years ago, 47 women took part in an unprecedented protest against what was then customary law. They drove a convoy of cars in Riyadh and were immediately arrested and detained for hours. They were released only after their male relatives signed undertakings that the women would not violate the ban again.

Those among them who had jobs in the public sector were dismissed from their jobs by a royal decree. A fatwa (religious ruling) was issued by the senior council of Ulama (Clerics) stating that women were not allowed to drive. This was followed by a government statement supporting the fatwa and warning of punishment for women who do not respect it. Opposition to the ban is growing once again as the economy opens up and more women find work.

The country's Labour Minister announced in May 2004 that women may carry out business activities without the need for a wakil (representative). Although the impact of this decision is still unclear, AI welcomes all steps that seek to reduce restrictions against women's right to work and lessen discrimination against women.

Women in Saudi Arabia continue to challenge many severe forms of discrimination in the fields of personal status, employment, participation in public life, the subordination of women to men, and restrictions on their freedom of movement.

[...]


Emphasis added. Independent women are suspected of being prostitutes.

That's about all I can say about this. I'll bow out now.

Cheers,
Scott.
New slavery is still legal in saudi, backward fsckers anyway
I love her dearly, far beyond any creature I've ever known, and I can prove it, for never once in almost seventy years of married life have I taken her by the throat. Mind you, it's been a near thing once or twice.
George Macdonald Frasier
Clearwater highschool marching band [link|http://www.chstornadoband.org/|http://www.chstornadoband.org/]
     Using sex to get answers. - (mmoffitt) - (25)
         Getting it easy - (JayMehaffey) - (2)
             You left out the sign. -NT - (inthane-chan)
             hey you want to wear red wings ya gotta like bloody mary -NT - (daemon)
         I'm a muslim terrorist and I demand to punished - (tuberculosis) - (9)
             So you'd be willing to give up the 72 virgins in heaven... - (ChrisR) - (8)
                 Sounds like a good enough deal. - (Andrew Grygus)
                 you ever met a virgin who was a good lay? -NT - (daemon) - (6)
                     Yes. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3)
                         The first time? - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                             Yes and yes. :D -NT - (inthane-chan)
                         The first time? - (tuberculosis)
                     No - (broomberg) - (1)
                         send her over on the 4th time then :-) -NT - (daemon)
         Murican troops need no special training in inducing guilt - (Ashton) - (11)
             As opposed to Hindu nations like Nepal? - (Another Scott) - (10)
                 Okay..l don't understand your reference... - (Simon_Jester) - (8)
                     good points - (daemon)
                     I brought it up because... - (Another Scott) - (6)
                         Ever heard of Benazir Bhutto? Powerful muslim women exist. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                             Also the prophet's daughter kicked serious ass as well -NT - (daemon)
                             Good counterpoint. But... - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                 family connections dont count here? Bush Kennedy -NT - (daemon) - (2)
                                     Of course they do. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                         slavery is still legal in saudi, backward fsckers anyway -NT - (daemon)
                 Re: As opposed to Hindu nations like Nepal? - (Ashton)

I have seen them...
67 ms