Errr.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #1,909 by addison 7/16/01 10:41:54 AM Reply	Errr. Did I say it did? I wasn't thinking that was really the problem, unless perhaps just that much pushed it into some sort of a timeout. (But even then, its got to turn around and send it all BACK, right?) (twice, actually, I'd presume, once formatted and once in the text box) Addison
Post #1,915 by admin 7/16/01 11:29:08 AM Reply	Yes, you did. :-) Perhaps its the upstream cap/bandwidth timing out the Zope connection Now, the upstream is capped, but you shouldn't get timeouts from that. I've never seen it take long at all. Regards, -scott anderson
Post #1,923 by addison 7/16/01 1:05:11 PM Reply	Yeah, but by the time you'd replied... I had it established that it was probably Opera's problem. :) Hence my confusion over your reply, there. :) Addison

Testing big-ass post, Opera 5, Solaris. - (addison) - (10) - July 13, 2001, 01:49:11 PM EDT

30 pastes. Successful test to destruction at 40. - (addison) - July 13, 2001, 01:52:45 PM EDT

Further refinements - 32.something. - (addison) - (8) - July 13, 2001, 01:58:03 PM EDT

Trying with Opera 5.11/Win. - (static) - (3) - July 13, 2001, 10:30:10 PM EDT

33 okay. Trying 40. - (static) - (2) - July 13, 2001, 10:32:24 PM EDT

40 okay - file a bug report Addison. :-) -NT - (static) - (1) - July 13, 2001, 10:33:19 PM EDT

80 got the same behavior with Linux Opera. -NT - (addison) - July 14, 2001, 11:10:06 AM EDT

Upstream shouldn't make a difference - (admin) - (3) - July 15, 2001, 09:45:48 PM EDT

Errr. - (addison) - (2) - July 16, 2001, 10:41:54 AM EDT

Yes, you did. :-) - (admin) - (1) - July 16, 2001, 11:29:08 AM EDT

Yeah, but by the time you'd replied... - (addison) - July 16, 2001, 01:05:11 PM EDT

We are gonna party all... night... LONG!
63 ms