20 is nothing

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #189,318 by SpiceWare 1/7/05 1:55:09 PM Reply	20 is nothing "closest 3 within 20 miles". (Or reorganize it about that limit) Who's going to drive more than that just to get to a dealer? distince is relative. When I lived in Corpus Christi, it was "forever" to drive anywere that was over 15 miles away. Now that I live in a large city, I think nothing about driving someplace that's 40 miles away(Fry's Electronics comes to mind). I'd say just list the closest 3 or 5, regardless of how far they actually are. Darrell Spice, Jr. [link\|http://www.spiceware.org/cgi-bin/spa.pl?album=./Artistic%20Overpass\|Artistic Overpass]\n[link\|http://www.spiceware.org/\|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore
Post #189,319 by ben_tilly 1/7/05 2:03:40 PM Reply	I may be biased I work for a company where people do a lot of searching. It has critical for us to find ways to optimize them. If your volume is low and performance needs are not critical, then sure. Go with the obvious dumb approach. But if you need to optimize later... Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #189,320 by SpiceWare 1/7/05 2:11:57 PM Reply	no disagreement about the code just the limit of < 20 miles. Darrell Spice, Jr. [link\|http://www.spiceware.org/cgi-bin/spa.pl?album=./Artistic%20Overpass\|Artistic Overpass]\n[link\|http://www.spiceware.org/\|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore

Any obvious pitfalls in using this? - (broomberg) - (18) - Jan. 5, 2005, 10:26:27 PM EST

expensive aint it? - (daemon) - (3) - Jan. 5, 2005, 10:47:50 PM EST

Huh? - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 5, 2005, 11:06:38 PM EST

isnt that what mapquest and grep comes in? -NT - (daemon) - Jan. 5, 2005, 11:23:59 PM EST

Well, I see the L pseudo scripting language is catching on. -NT - (ChrisR) - Jan. 5, 2005, 11:18:44 PM EST

Possible distance quirk. - (static) - (5) - Jan. 5, 2005, 11:22:00 PM EST

Yep, thought of that - (broomberg) - (4) - Jan. 6, 2005, 12:05:42 AM EST

Consider natural barriers like rivers too... - (Another Scott) - (3) - Jan. 6, 2005, 12:24:33 AM EST

As the bird flies - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 6, 2005, 12:30:16 AM EST

You do something clever with the number of results. - (static) - (1) - Jan. 6, 2005, 07:37:35 PM EST

Too confusing - (broomberg) - Jan. 6, 2005, 08:30:10 PM EST

Well the code is crap... - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Jan. 6, 2005, 11:17:53 PM EST

Not much code there to be THAT bad. - (broomberg) - (6) - Jan. 6, 2005, 11:32:56 PM EST

It doesn't take much to be bad - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Jan. 7, 2005, 01:53:56 PM EST

Nice. It's things like this that make zIWeThey a great read. -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 7, 2005, 01:51:21 PM EST

20 is nothing - (SpiceWare) - (2) - Jan. 7, 2005, 01:55:09 PM EST

I may be biased - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 7, 2005, 02:03:40 PM EST

no disagreement about the code - (SpiceWare) - Jan. 7, 2005, 02:11:57 PM EST

Thanks -NT - (broomberg) - Jan. 7, 2005, 07:21:29 PM EST

iwethey.org

Fear the rubberwear.
80 ms