They must be providing a router, then.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #189,050 by pwhysall 1/4/05 7:47:29 PM Reply	They must be providing a router, then. Or are the other two doing it for a larf? Peter [link\|http://www.ubuntulinux.org\|Ubuntu Linux] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #189,051 by inthane-chan 1/4/05 7:48:48 PM Reply	Considering QWest offers an "upscale" offering... ...that uses the same equipment, but no PPPoE, ("Always on internet!") it appears to be some kind of market segmentation thing. "Here at Ortillery Command we have at our disposal hundred megawatt laser beams, mach 20 titanium rods and guided thermonuclear bombs. Some people say we think that we're God. We're not God. We just borrowed his 'SMITE' button for our fire control system."
Post #189,067 by Steve Lowe 1/4/05 10:58:10 PM Reply	Qwest line with local ISP No PPPoE here. Qwest provided modem/router, which I have configured just as a bridge. My inlaws have Qwest/MSN with the same modem/router..but it uses PPPoE. I do my routing and firewalling with a linux box (IPCop) as I have a /29 network from my ISP. -- Steve

PPPoE - (inthane-chan) - (12) - Jan. 4, 2005, 12:35:02 PM EST

Most hardware routers/firewalls have PPPoE built in - (admin) - Jan. 4, 2005, 12:49:15 PM EST

How about trying - (folkert) - Jan. 4, 2005, 04:18:45 PM EST

what your dslam likes to hear - (daemon) - Jan. 4, 2005, 06:33:58 PM EST

Price of going over copper that was never designed for > 8Kb -NT - (pwhysall) - (5) - Jan. 4, 2005, 06:41:10 PM EST

Price, my ass. - (inthane-chan) - (3) - Jan. 4, 2005, 07:10:23 PM EST

They must be providing a router, then. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2005, 07:47:29 PM EST

Considering QWest offers an "upscale" offering... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2005, 07:48:48 PM EST

Qwest line with local ISP - (Steve Lowe) - Jan. 4, 2005, 10:58:10 PM EST

No. - (imric) - Jan. 4, 2005, 09:44:44 PM EST

It is for login processing and accounting - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2005, 07:50:57 PM EST

Like I said... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2005, 09:29:54 PM EST

No you didn't. - (broomberg) - Jan. 4, 2005, 10:08:39 PM EST

Yeah, would be nice if "despair" wasn't such an appropriate word choice.
65 ms