I think that one means...

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #188,299

by pwhysall

12/27/04 2:17:51 PM

I think that one means...

..."Go and get a proper database!"

GD&R

Post #188,303

by acagle

12/27/04 2:25:41 PM

Re: I think that one means...

The problem is, I have historically neglected to pay much attention to proper error handling.

Post #188,307

by inthane-chan

12/27/04 2:42:20 PM

From the 10 Commandments of C Programming:

#6: If a function be advertised to return an error code in the event of difficulties, thou shalt check for that code, yea, even though the checks triple the size of thy code and produce aches in thy typing fingers, for if thou thinkest ``it cannot happen to me'', the gods shall surely punish thee for thy arrogance.

And yes, it applies to VB as well. :)

"Here at Ortillery Command we have at our disposal hundred megawatt laser beams, mach 20 titanium rods and guided thermonuclear bombs. Some people say we think that we're God. We're not God. We just borrowed his 'SMITE' button for our fire control system."

Post #188,313

by acagle

12/27/04 4:08:09 PM

So.

How does one go about making a global error handler?

Post #188,320

by JayMehaffey

12/27/04 4:37:03 PM

In VB?

On Error Resume Next was the most popular method I saw. I wouldn't recomend it myself.

Jay

Post #188,332

by acagle

12/27/04 5:30:43 PM

Re: In VB?

Yes.

Post #188,347

by ben_tilly

12/27/04 6:29:15 PM

You can use On Error GoTo

Or at least you could way back in the day.

I don't know whether Microsoft has now added some form of exception handling to the language. If they did, then use that instead. (Unless it is really, really broken.)

Cheers,
Ben

I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)

Post #188,501

by Steven A S

12/29/04 3:37:21 PM

That's still the way

It's the way Microsoft still does it with the auto code in Office 2003

Private Sub Button_Click
On Error Goto err_Button_Click
   code
   ...
exit_Button_Click:
   Exit Sub
err_Button_Click:
   Msgbox Err.Description
   Resume exit_Button_Click
End Sub

after the err_whatever: tag, you can set up code to compare the Err.Code and handle whatever errors you expect.

~~~)-Steven----

"I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country.
He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country..."

General George S. Patton

Post #188,350

by JayMehaffey

12/27/04 7:33:54 PM

That was a joke

That was a joke, not a programming idea. On Error Resume Next tells VB to simply continue with the next step when there is an error. This causes all sorts of havok when there is a real problem.

But if you want a really global error trap, then either put the entire program inside a try/catch block or a global On Error statement at the start.

There isn't much you can do in VB if you catch errors at that level though. All you can do is present some formatted error information and quit.

Jay

Post #188,373

by static

12/28/04 5:30:48 AM

For certain techniques, it works.

Specifically, the practice of manually checking ErrCode after steps that could catastrophically fail. It's a bit lazy, though for some types of code, the risk of an uncaught error is suitably low.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed

Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

Post #188,567

by mmoffitt

12/30/04 12:26:38 PM

Opinions vary on "Global" error checking in VB.

But in general, it is thought to be a bad idea. I'm in that camp.

bcnu,
Mikem

Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
(Just trying to be accepted in the New America)

Access: Runtime error 91. - (acagle) - (22) - Dec. 27, 2004, 02:04:44 PM EST

I think that one means... - (pwhysall) - (10) - Dec. 27, 2004, 02:17:51 PM EST

Re: I think that one means... - (acagle) - (9) - Dec. 27, 2004, 02:25:41 PM EST

From the 10 Commandments of C Programming: - (inthane-chan) - (8) - Dec. 27, 2004, 02:42:20 PM EST

So. - (acagle) - (7) - Dec. 27, 2004, 04:08:09 PM EST

In VB? - (JayMehaffey) - (5) - Dec. 27, 2004, 04:37:03 PM EST

Re: In VB? - (acagle) - (4) - Dec. 27, 2004, 05:30:43 PM EST

You can use On Error GoTo - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Dec. 27, 2004, 06:29:15 PM EST

That's still the way - (Steven A S) - Dec. 29, 2004, 03:37:21 PM EST

That was a joke - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Dec. 27, 2004, 07:33:54 PM EST

For certain techniques, it works. - (static) - Dec. 28, 2004, 05:30:48 AM EST

Opinions vary on "Global" error checking in VB. - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 30, 2004, 12:26:38 PM EST

That's the technical term "set" - (FuManChu) - (4) - Dec. 27, 2004, 11:24:31 PM EST

Re: That's the technical term "set" - (acagle) - (3) - Dec. 28, 2004, 05:28:42 PM EST

Yes, unfortunately. - (FuManChu) - Dec. 29, 2004, 02:26:17 AM EST

Putting it in every procedure is good practice for VB. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Dec. 29, 2004, 09:38:14 AM EST

Dangitall. - (acagle) - Dec. 29, 2004, 12:23:59 PM EST

Update: (+edit) - (acagle) - (5) - Dec. 29, 2004, 12:57:53 PM EST

You're probably all over this, but... - (Steven A S) - (1) - Dec. 29, 2004, 03:27:59 PM EST

Re: You're probably all over this, but... - (acagle) - Dec. 29, 2004, 03:47:06 PM EST

Where is the declaration exactly? And a few more q's. - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 30, 2004, 12:40:15 PM EST

Did you get this fixed? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 3, 2005, 08:33:37 PM EST

Re: Did you get this fixed? - (acagle) - Jan. 24, 2005, 05:36:50 PM EST

iwethey.org

My brain hurts thinking about how you know all of that.
65 ms