Debatable that the rules were followed.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #18,300 by Silverlock 11/14/01 4:21:54 PM Reply	Debatable that the rules were followed. But not worth the effort. We have a legally appointed president who would have been elected and is not the choice of the electorate. I can live with that and hope he is voted out come next election. A much larger hope is that a candidate is offered who is remotely worthy of being elected. How to mangle the truth; Have it reported by any major U.S. media outlet.
Post #18,304 by bepatient 11/14/01 4:40:00 PM Reply	Amen brutha! A much larger hope is that a candidate is offered who is remotely worthy of being elected. On that we agree. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #18,376 by boxley 11/14/01 11:23:07 PM Reply	Ventura or Knowles, but they wont run tshirt front "born to die before I get old" thshirt back "fscked another one didnja?"

Bush would have won anyway - (bluke) - (45) - Nov. 12, 2001, 05:54:44 AM EST

20/20 hindsight. The deed was done in ignorance and fear - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2001, 06:27:31 AM EST

Read further and you will see... - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 12, 2001, 09:27:39 AM EST

You'll notice... - (bepatient) - (33) - Nov. 12, 2001, 10:36:16 AM EST

re: By the standards set. - (Silverlock) - Nov. 12, 2001, 11:35:27 AM EST

You still don't get it, do you? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (30) - Nov. 12, 2001, 03:18:31 PM EST

Sure I do... - (bepatient) - (29) - Nov. 12, 2001, 08:37:47 PM EST

Don't think I'm missing anything. - (mmoffitt) - (28) - Nov. 13, 2001, 09:13:55 AM EST

Mega dittoes, Rush. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2001, 10:43:03 AM EST

Rush? S.O.B. is as far as I go with a joke! -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 13, 2001, 11:04:45 AM EST

Sure you are... - (bepatient) - (25) - Nov. 13, 2001, 12:41:06 PM EST

So only *some* of the votes should have been counted, right? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (24) - Nov. 13, 2001, 02:51:40 PM EST

The ones that the FL SC said to count...correct. - (bepatient) - (23) - Nov. 13, 2001, 03:26:49 PM EST

At last! We see the difference between us. - (mmoffitt) - (22) - Nov. 13, 2001, 03:45:38 PM EST

Wrong... - (bepatient) - (21) - Nov. 13, 2001, 04:42:31 PM EST

So then - if an AG is behaving in a patently biased way - (Ashton) - Nov. 13, 2001, 09:00:57 PM EST

Just wondering - (JayMehaffey) - (11) - Nov. 13, 2001, 09:38:08 PM EST

you mean the demomob stopping military counts? :) - (boxley) - (10) - Nov. 13, 2001, 10:00:48 PM EST

That was the flaw, they (or Gore) didn't stop them. - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Nov. 14, 2001, 09:49:07 AM EST

Regardless. - (bepatient) - (8) - Nov. 14, 2001, 10:28:26 AM EST

You're right - (Silverlock) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2001, 11:40:41 AM EST

In this case... - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:01:04 PM EST

correct outcome? - (Silverlock) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:08:49 PM EST

All reports.. - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:30:29 PM EST

Debatable that the rules were followed. - (Silverlock) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2001, 04:21:54 PM EST

Amen brutha! - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2001, 04:40:00 PM EST

Ventura or Knowles, but they wont run -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2001, 11:23:07 PM EST

In Summary. - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 18, 2001, 08:22:08 PM EST

Nope. I only object to selective enforcement. - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Nov. 14, 2001, 09:50:59 AM EST

yup and the law says overcounted ballots must be thrown out - (boxley) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2001, 12:05:04 PM EST

:-) -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:01:48 PM EST

Of course, the law also states... - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:29:04 PM EST

And the ruling on the field was? -NT - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:39:06 PM EST

(IIRC) The appeals court overturned the law. - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2001, 04:58:25 PM EST

postmarks were required by fl law not by federal at time -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2001, 11:21:57 PM EST

True..but believe it or not... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 15, 2001, 10:50:00 AM EST

Related logic: "I saw Bigfoot once". -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2001, 06:48:45 PM EST

Even though more people voted for Gore. - (Silverlock) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:01:38 PM EST

I don't think that point is ignored. - (bepatient) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:04:16 PM EST

Irrelevant? The twisting of rules denies peoples choice - (Silverlock) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:17:37 PM EST

You should know how to respond... - (bepatient) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:48:36 PM EST

Ah, but it was the precident - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 14, 2001, 03:25:57 PM EST

But who else but the partisans can act in the courts? - (Another Scott) - Nov. 14, 2001, 04:36:24 PM EST

So the USSC cost Bush the election - (mhuber) - (2) - Nov. 16, 2001, 02:16:42 AM EST

Maybe the only obvious 'truth' to emerge yet! -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 16, 2001, 06:04:43 AM EST

Well....yeah, put that way... -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 16, 2001, 07:43:50 AM EST

iwethey.org

CRC error. Reload.
111 ms